Question 2570 — pensions: general

Summary

Mrs Martine Wonner questions the Minister of Solidarity and Health on the consequences of article L. 325-1 of the social security code which established a right of option to the local scheme for retirees residing in another State of the European Union. These policyholders now have the choice of whether or not to fall under the local regime. However, this same article L. 325-1 sets out the complementary and obligatory nature of the local health insurance scheme. of Alsace Moselle. This basic principle is therefore called into question, even though the benefit of adding the right of option does not emerge from the decision of the European Commission and is not justified. In addition, the right of option gives rise to a risk of litigation between old-age pensioners residing in France with an obligation to affiliate, and therefore to contribute, to the RLAM and those residing in another Member State of the European Union. benefiting from the right of option. Sensitive to the local regime having been herself a medical advisor to the CNAMTS, she therefore proposed an amendment which removes the right of option wrongly established by the social security financing law for 2017 for new retirees residing in another State of the European Union. She would therefore like to know his position on this subject.

Machine translation from French. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.