Question 27790 — employment and activity

Summary

Mr. Patrick Loiseau draws the attention of the Minister of Labor to the threshold effect that the payment of the activity bonus can generate. Paid to employees and civil servants under certain conditions, in particular that of receiving modest income from professional activity, it replaces the old active solidarity income and the employment bonus. He believes that this aid constitutes a good initiative to enable a additional income for the most modest, which also explains its great success with regard to the millions of beneficiary households to date. Its allocation on a monthly basis constitutes one of the conditions of its success with many households, as it allows a real additional income. However, for certain employers, the monthly payment of such a bonus may result in a lack of flexibility with regard to the need to adapt to fluctuations in activity. Even if its amount is already subject to adaptations such as a quarterly declaration with a view to a possible revaluation, or even reimbursements requested in the event of overpayments, this does not always appear fully adapted in certain sectors of activity. This is why he asks what measures the ministry can put in place in order to be able to develop or adjust, for example via a deposit or regularization for the year, this activity bonus, with the aim of avoiding this threshold effect sometimes encountered in certain companies.

Machine translation from French. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.