PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

France · Question · Question écrite

31484

Question 31484 — health professions

openFrance· National Assembly· FR

Introduced

Last action

Status

posée

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

Summary

Ms. Monica Michel-Brassart draws the attention of the Minister of Solidarity and Health to the situation of practitioners with diplomas outside the European Union (Padhue) working in hospitals. These women and men doctors, surgeons and even gynecologists-obstetricians from abroad were partly trained in France. Compensating for the lack of staff at the hospital, particularly in under-dense areas, their commitment during the health crisis coronavirus was as exemplary as that of their French peers despite a much more precarious professional status and a lower salary than a student at the start of their internship. Added to this is a particularly long and complex exercise authorization procedure (PAE). Article 70 of Law No. 2019-774 on the transformation of the health system was to modernize the status of the Padhue, a decree implementing this article being published in June 2020. This decree, however, showed its limits since it does not concern the terms of organization of PAE and does not mention the regularization of foreign doctors. Also, she questions him on the deadline for publication of the additional decrees necessary for the application of this point of the law on the transformation of the health system and more broadly on the measures that the Government intends to take to grant Pay the gratitude that the Nation owes them.

Machine translation from French. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.