Question 3264 — energy and fuels

Summary

Mr. Maxime Laisney draws the attention of the Minister of the Armed Forces to the project to subcontract access controls to the Cadarache Atomic Energy Commission (CEA) site. The deputy was alerted by the social and economic committee (CSE) of the CEA Cadarache site about the project to replace CEA employees of local safety training (FLS), historical guarantors of the protection of installations and employees, with employees subcontractors. The MP is particularly concerned about a loss of reaction capacity in the event of a threat, but also of dissuasion, due to the disarmament of subcontractor employees, who are less trained and less equipped, in a site hosting activities linked to nuclear defense. He is also concerned about the social attack on a protective status of employees which contributes to maintaining the protection of interests, nuclear safety and the security of workers, citizens and property. Furthermore, the choice to replace trained agents with disarmed subcontractor employees is in total inconsistency with the high level of requirements demanded by the regulations for the protection and control of nuclear materials, installation and transport (PCMNIT) and by the Nuclear Safety and Radiation Protection Authority (ASNR, formerly the Nuclear Safety Authority). To this Added to this is the massive rejection of the subcontracting project by the site's employees. Precisely, 80% of FLS staff are against the subcontracting project according to a petition led by the CSE of the CEA of Cadarache. For all these reasons, the MP firmly supports the request of the CSE of the CEA of Cadarache to cease the project of subcontracting access controls on the site of the Atomic Energy Commission (CEA) of Cadarache. He also says his opposition to the same project envisaged on the Marcoule site. Furthermore, he addresses the following questions to the Minister in order to provide as much transparency as possible on the subject. Firstly, can he indicate the motivations for this project? If this project is motivated by an employment ceiling imposed by the supervisory ministry in parallel with an increase in missions for FLS personnel, does he think that this project is worth taking? such safety risks on a nuclear site, vis-à-vis workers and citizens? Finally, to the extent that the CEA Marcoule site is also considering outsourcing its access controls, can he specify the scale of the project and whether it is intended to extend to more CEA sites? He wants answers about this.

Machine translation from French. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.