PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

France · Question · Question écrite

34120

Question 34120 — social and solidarity economy

openFrance· National Assembly· FR

Introduced

Last action

Status

posée

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

Summary

Ms. Frédérique Tuffnell draws the attention of the Minister of Ecological Transition to the discrepancy between the provisional decree implementing law no. 2020-105 of February 10, 2020 and the content of the debates in the chamber during the vote on the aforementioned law, relating to the fight against waste and the circular economy (LGEC). During the examination of the text, in 2019, parliamentarians recorded the creation of a system entitled “fund for reuse solidarity” whose purpose is to allocate the necessary means for the development of associations of a social nature working for the employment of the most precarious, the reduction of waste, environmental education and access to responsible consumption. The law aimed at the multiplication of structures, the creation of more than 70,000 local jobs, allowing citizen commitment to the environment and solidarity to find places physical in order to act concretely. Certain guarantees had been introduced in the National Assembly. First of all, that funds be directed only towards the social and solidarity economy (ESS), to promote leverage in this sector. Then that funding is not awarded on calls for projects but on criteria of accessibility and work objectives to be achieved. However, according to the formula of the draft implementing decree accompanying the LGEC law, it is proposed to reserve only 50% of this funding for the ESS and to make the remaining 50% accessible to the commercial sphere outside the ESS. This opening to the traditional competitive sector, contrary to the wishes of the legislator, could undermine the functioning of associations which operate in particularly difficult conditions today. She asks him if the draft decree will be revised in order to to take into account the spirit of the law passed by Parliament.

Machine translation from French. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.