Question 38669 — housing

Summary

Mr. Buon Tan questions the Minister Delegate to the Minister for Ecological Transition, responsible for housing, on the objectives set by the “SRU” law in terms of construction of social housing, and more particularly on one of the main weaknesses of the current legislative framework: the absence of a distribution key within large cities such as Paris, as well as its corollary, the saturation of social housing in peripheral districts compared to central districts. The city of Paris is in fact characterized by a particularly heterogeneous distribution of social housing: while the 13th arrondissement and the 19th have 39.5% and 42.1% respectively, others such as the 7th and 8th have only 2.1% and 3.4%. However, to the extent that Paris has still not achieved the objective of having 25% social housing, this dynamic is increasing: the districts most concerned are often those in which there is still available land, they are the ones who continue to support the effort to build new housing. This problem also occurs within the neighborhoods of the districts most concerned, which are also unequally involved in the construction effort, or even within buildings, where the policy current allocation prevents any social diversity. However, these strong distortions result in significant social and geographic inequalities as well as a concentration of poverty that we cannot accept. This also results in a worrying phenomenon of ghettoization, with the territories concerned often combining great precariousness, lack of diversity, desertion from schools and growing insecurity. Include in law the The principle of a fair distribution of social housing between districts, or even within the neighborhoods that make them up, seems to be the best way to build true social diversity and reduce the strong inequalities currently observed. It is also important that, before undertaking new construction in the districts most concerned, the construction effort is focused primarily on those with the lowest rates of social housing. Likewise, protecting a percentage of intermediate housing in neighborhoods with a high concentration of very low-income beneficiaries would make it possible to guarantee greater social diversity there, and thus to combat the phenomena of ghettoization mentioned above. Also, he asks what measures the Government intends to take, particularly during the examination parliamentarian of the so-called “4D” bill, in order to ensure equitable distribution of social housing construction in Paris.

Machine translation from French. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.