PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

France · Question · Question écrite

39732

Question 39732 — liberal professions

openFrance· National Assembly· FR

Introduced

Last action

Status

posée

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

Summary

Mr. Daniel Labaronne draws the attention of the Minister of Labor, Employment and Integration to the refusal to renew the professional title “Shiatsu Specialist” by France Compétences (FC). This body, which replaces the National Professional Certification Commission, has in fact judged that criterion No. 1, namely the adequacy between the targeted jobs and the labor market, was not met. If shiatsu practitioners are few to make a complete living from the exercise of this activity, the fact remains that the adequacy of the profession to the market is measured by the large number of sessions given and the multiple interventions which take place in hospitals, in nursing homes, in associations aimed at supporting vulnerable people, such as people suffering from Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, or even spectrum disorders autistic. This example raises questions more generally about the new criteria retained by France Compétences, and about the support it provides to different professions in their process of recognizing professional qualifications. He would therefore like to have more details on the motivations for this decision in this case, and would like more generally to know the means and criteria on which France Relaunch relies. to guarantee the adequacy of professional certifications with economic and social needs.

Machine translation from French. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.