PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

France · Question · Question écrite

4103

Question 4103 — animals

answeredFrance· National Assembly· FR

Introduced

18 February 2025

Last action

Status

répondue

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

22 April 2025

Summary

Mrs. Fatiha Keloua Hachi draws the attention of the Minister of Culture to the exploitation of wild animals in the context of shows organized within fixed zoological establishments. The law of November 30, 2021 aimed at combating animal abuse and strengthening the bond between man and animal provides, in article 46, that from 2028, will be “prohibited, in itinerant establishments, the detention, transport and shows including non-domestic animal species”. Furthermore, zoological parks have the mission of participating in conservation actions for animal species, as clearly stated in chapter 6 of the decree of March 25, 2004. This text defines the general operating rules and requirements applicable to fixed and permanent zoological establishments presenting live specimens of fauna to the public. local or foreign. However, shows involving wild animals remain authorized in fixed establishments (including zoological parks), in contradiction with the objectives of animal welfare and the conservation of threatened species. Through coercive training methods, wild animals, which are particularly present in this type of spectacle, are widely exploited. Also, she would like to know what measures it is considering to remedy this situation and ensure better protection of wild animals in fixed zoological establishments.

Machine translation from French. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.