PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

France · Question · Question écrite

42722

Question 42722 — health professions

openFrance· National Assembly· FR

Introduced

Last action

Status

posée

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

Summary

Ms. Isabelle Santiago alerts the Minister of Solidarity and Health about the sidelining of childcare nurses in carrying out early postnatal interviews. During the study of the 2022 social security financing bill, amendment number 2306 was proposed by the Government which aimed to establish an early postnatal interview. This measure was welcomed in the sense of greater prevention, particularly of postpartum depression and with the aim of better support. However, this amendment which provided that this interview could be carried out by a doctor, a midwife or a childcare nurse was withdrawn in order to present another which this time did not mention childcare nurses. This decision raises many questions about its motivation and its consequences. In fact, nurses Childcare workers are trained in parenting support, identifying depression in adults as well as the specificities of the child's psycho-emotional development. They are already involved in this field and during the period concerned by the early post-natal interview in PMI services. In the medical sector, this decision also raised questions, with midwives having notably stressed the importance of working in multidisciplinarity and complementarity. The reality on the ground is there and the successful implementation of early postnatal care depends on this decision. It is the conditions of support for young parents but also for newborns that come into play. She would therefore like to know the reasons for this sudden sidelining of childcare nurses and to know when he intends to clarify this situation and the integrate into this system, for example in the continuation of the legislative process of the text and as quickly as possible in the interest of parents and newborns.

Machine translation from French. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.