France · Question · Question écrite
9361
Question 9361 — family benefits
Introduced
12 August 2025
Last action
—
Status
répondue
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
7 July 2026
Summary
Ms. Élisabeth de Maistre draws the attention of the Minister of Labor, Health, Solidarity and Families to the consequences of the recent reform of the childcare supplement (CMG) for families. Presented as more equitable, the reform implemented by decrees n° 2025-514 and 2025-515 establishes a new method of calculating the aid paid, based on a complex formula, difficult to read for users and leading in evidence of a significant reduction in support for many households. A representative example shows that, for a dual-earner couple with two children and a reference tax income of 102,000 euros per year, the amount of monthly aid drops from around 203 euros to 90 euros, i.e. an annual loss of nearly 1,356 euros. This additional cost weighs heavily on households that are already largely tax contributors, without however belong to the wealthiest categories. This reform thus creates a brutal and unfair threshold effect for some French families who work, often extended hours, and use childminders to carry out their professional activity. It therefore wishes to know whether it intends to carry out a re-evaluation of this system in order to correct its regressive effects on households engaged in economic life. of the country. She questions him in particular about the possibility of re-establishing a fairer aid floor for these families, or of introducing real progressiveness in the calculation of the CMG.
Machine translation from French. The official text remains authoritative.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
No documents linked.
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/dyn/17/questions/QANR5L17QE9361
- Open data entity: https://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/dyn/opendata/QANR5L17QE9361