Records
6 records where Lénaïck Adam is listed as a sponsor, author, or other actor. Search with topics and years
Question· Question écrite40256open
France · National Assembly
Mr. Lénaïck Adam alerts the Minister Delegate to the Minister of National Education, Youth and Sports, responsible for sports, to the problems encountered by Guyanese athletes coming to compete in France, taking into account the strict health protocol put in place for Guyanese people. He was recently contacted by the Guyana Football League regarding a request for an exceptional trip to the United States. of America as part of an international football competition, the Gold Cup 2021. Indeed, this type of travel was not considered a compelling reason by the prefecture of Guyana. After referral to the Ministry of Sports, the prefecture of Guyana ruled in favor of athletes from Guyana, deciding to authorize travel within the framework of sports competitions, henceforth considering that this was a compelling reason. By Elsewhere, he was then alerted by the U17 fencing team from Guyana which was ordered to quarantine, ranging from 7 to 10 days depending on the athletes' vaccination schedule, once it arrived in France as part of its trip to the French championship. This situation is not tenable for sports organizations in Guyana. Indeed, the quarantine imposed on athletes before their competition not only involves remarkable organization for athletes who, often, have a salaried job, but above all the advance of staggering costs by their sports organization. However, the state of health emergency, still in force in Guyana, requires a strict protocol during each training of athletes, especially since their gatherings take place only behind closed doors in order to limit interactions with potential carriers of the virus. Furthermore, the Guyana is a French territory. In this sense, there should not be so many restrictions on the arrival of athletes in France. This greatly prevents the smooth running of their competition, despite the presentation of their negative RT-PCR test carried out less than 48 hours before the flight as well as a negative antigen test after the flight. So, he asks her if she will reconsider this protocol seriously, in which case it would deprive her of unfair way for all of Guyana to represent sports nationally and internationally.
Question· Question écrite39090open
France · National Assembly
Mr. Lénaïck Adam alerts the Minister of Higher Education, Research and Innovation to the discriminatory nature of the system to combat dropout, isolation and precariousness of students. As part of this system, the Government has launched the recruitment of 20,000 student tutors. However, applications from foreign students, particularly those in an irregular situation, are automatically rejected. This sidelined, if it falls within the framework of the legislation which governs the salaried employment of foreigners in France, is inconsistent to the extent that these students were authorized to enroll in university training. It is hardly understandable to allow these students to register at the University and then hinder their integration into university life. Especially since this measure, in addition to facilitating the insertion social security of these students, would allow them to meet their needs, especially in these times of health crisis when their expenses remain unchanged: rent, food, transport, among others. If the MP welcomes the one-euro meal system put in place by the Government and open to all students, he deplores the inadequacy of the latter to combat student precariousness, particularly that of students. foreigners. Still too many foreign students are forced to engage in informal employment, or worse still, illicit activities (drug trafficking, prostitution) to meet their needs. Thus, he asks him to seriously study the extension of the “student tutoring” system to all students, subject to their academic results and social criteria. It would therefore be appropriate to work together with the prefectural services to better process the residence permit application files of these students in order to facilitate their integration into civic life.
Question· Question écrite37393answered
France · National Assembly
Mr. Lénaïck Adam alerts the Minister of the Armed Forces about the investigation carried out by Mediapart regarding the fifty soldiers of the French army involved in neo-Nazi acts. This investigation revealed a video taken in 2018 by a soldier of the foreign legion of the 3rd REI of Kourou in which children uttered and mimed neo-Nazi gestures. This video deeply shocked the Guyanese population. In Guyana, civilians and soldiers cohabit together, even more than in France, with regard to the missions specific to this territory which are added to the common law missions of the army: security of the Guiana Space Center and the fight against illegal gold panning. These unacceptable and unsustainable behaviors go against the values and missions of the army in Guyana and in the country more generally. In view of these elements, the MP therefore wishes to have concrete elements of response. On the one hand, he wants to know if the author of this video has been identified, sanctioned and if so, by what means. On the other hand, he wants to know the means put in place by the army to eradicate this behavior.
Question· Question écrite40574answered
France · National Assembly · 7 March 2021
Mr. Lénaïck Adam draws the attention of the Minister of Transformation and the Public Service to the inconsistencies suffered by overseas civil servants, beneficiaries of enhanced leave, from their administrations. Firstly, the MP would like to draw the attention of the Minister to the case of civil servants whose rights were opened before the date of entry into force of Decree No. 2020-851 relating to reform of the bonus leave system on July 2, 2020. In fact, in accordance with the circular of January 16, 1978, it is possible to postpone one's right to bonus leave. Consequently, certain civil servants who benefited from this right of deferral are refused by their administration the possibility of benefiting from the regime, then in force when they carried out their deferral, namely 65 days of consecutive leave every 36 month. The MP would like to know what regulations apply to them. Clarification of this point for these agents would be desirable. To this end, the MP also proposes the development of a guide by the appropriate ministerial services for other administrations in order to fill this gap. Secondly, he also underlines that it would be appropriate to update, in the light of the aforementioned decree, the circular of 16 August 1978 concerning the application of Decree No. 78-309 of March 20, 1978 relating, for overseas departments, to the payment of travel expenses for enhanced leave granted to magistrates and civil servants of the State. In fact, transport costs are no longer reimbursed but covered since the reform. Thirdly, the MP wishes to question the Minister regarding the 31 consecutive days of leave annual payments that must be taken by the beneficiary civil servant in accordance with article 6 of decree of March 20, 1978 no. 78-399. He wonders whether these 31 consecutive days are counted by counting weekends and public holidays as well as a few days of annual leave that the agent must take out of his 25 regulatory days. Finally, the MP wishes to draw the minister's attention to the fact that several administrations have paid their agent, since the entry into force of the decree of July 2, 2020, the “cost of living” allowance, not during the stay but at the end of it. So he asks her to clarify this.
Question· Question écrite36852open
France · National Assembly · 2 February 2021
Mr. Lénaïck Adam questions the Minister of National Education, Youth and Sports on several points relating to the application of the health protocol in primary education in Guyana. Firstly, students in elementary schools in Guyana are not required to wear a mask, unlike other students in the national territory. Another inconsistency is the non-application in Guyana of the measure according to which is systemically expelled all students from a nursery class as soon as one of them tests positive for covid-19. Then, there is no plan for a systematic closure of elementary classes in which a student tests positive for a variant. The MP wishes to raise the concerns of teachers in Guyana and educational staff as a whole regarding their health security and that of their surroundings. Also, should we add that Guyana borders Brazil, a country where a variant just as virulent as covid-19 and its other variants is actively circulating? Several cases of variants have, as such, already been detected in Guyana. Therefore, he asks him why the national health protocol is not applied in Guyana. He would like to know what reasons justify this difference in treatment.
Question· Question écrite30225open
France · National Assembly · 5 September 2020
Mr. Lénaïck Adam questions the Minister for Europe and Foreign Affairs on the closure of the Franco-Brazilian border in a health crisis situation. On March 19, 2020, the prefect of Guyana announced the closure of the borders with Suriname and Brazil. If the border with Suriname is effectively closed and monitored over 540 kilometers of river, that of Brazil is still not. Indeed, if the passages by the river are closely monitored, the bridge linking the communes of Saint-Georges de l'Oyapock to Oiapoque is open three days a week, in both directions, thus allowing people from Brazil to enter Guyana. Moreover, article 11 of the prefectural decree of June 2, 2020 specifies that, except in the case of exceptions set restrictively by regulatory act, the opening of the Saint-Georges land border crossing point would be Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays from 10 a.m. to 12 p.m. This is surprising for a so-called “closed” border area. To this astonishment which raises questions, the prefect responds that the people returning to Guyana are of French or Brazilian nationality in a legal situation. There is reason to question whether there is a real difference between the previous situation, before the decision to close the border is taken and the current situation. Was it not exclusively people in a regular situation who were already crossing the bridge before the period of health crisis? It is also surprising that so many people, sometimes more than ten at each visit, fall under the exceptions provided for by the provisions of the prefectural decree. There are also, according to information from the MP, Brazilian patients, suffering from chronic infections, residing in Oiapoque, who continue to cross the bridge to go to consultations at the health center. These patients then return to Brazil without there being the slightest control over their comings and goings when they are on the French territory of Saint-Georges de l'Oyapock. All people crossing the border, and presenting symptoms, have, since May 22, 2020, and only since that date, subjected to screening tests. These people had until now been invited to stay in the city's college, roughly converted into a reception center while awaiting the results. This solution, however, presented a significant potential danger since people, ultimately negative, were authorized to continue their route towards Cayenne or Kourou, or even France, even though they had been in contact with people recognized as positive. Since May 29, 2020, and only since this date, all people, symptomatic or not, have been tested, which has led to the strengthening of the medical system on deck. This point is also subject to questions because, it should be remembered, the border was closed on March 19, 2020. These more restrictive measures were taken after asymptomatic people having crossed the border to go to Guyana were finally recognized as positive. All these people are sent to the college, and are physically separated depending on whether or not they present symptoms. This management, which is intended to be medicalized, does not however put an end to cohabitation, just like the previous protocol, between people ultimately recognized as positive and those recognized as negative, authorized to continue their journey in Guyana or towards France. It is also curious to note that the tests are now presented as a guarantee of health security upon entry into Guyanese territory, for people coming, it should be remembered, from a state where the virus is circulating and the cause of six deaths, according to the official count in the border town of Oiapoque as of June 2, 2020. The director general of the ARS of Guyana declared recently that systematic screening of passengers coming from France was not a solution given the significant risk of false negatives. Unlike the arrangements made with Suriname, the border with Brazil is not closed, since people and goods continue to cross it on Mondays, Tuesdays and Fridays. Customs has even had to postpone freight passage times in order to streamline traffic on the bridge. The measures put in place do not appear, according to the MP, likely to slow down, but on the contrary to encourage the spread of the virus throughout the rest of Guyanese territory. Several clusters, now active in Kourou and on the island of Cayenne, are directly linked to this uncontrolled border post. The Brazilian community in Guyana is therefore strongly affected, even in the west, in Mana and Saint-Laurent du Maroni. THE Residents of the west are therefore particularly worried because the previous clusters, including the first in Guyana, had all been brought under control and the situation seems to be becoming difficult to control again. Finally, the other paradox is to ask the inhabitants of Saint-Georges to confine themselves even though the authorities leave the border open as specified above. The population does not understand. By these observations, the idea is not not to stigmatize but to highlight facts which will harm the Guyanese population as a whole by accelerating the circulation of the virus. Based on this observation, he asks what measures the Government intends to take to truly control the border and more firmly regulate the spread of the virus by infected people; urgency commands because the now active clusters raise fears of a large epidemic magnitude in Guyana.