Records
5 records where Frédéric-Pierre Vos is listed as a sponsor, author, or other actor. Search with topics and years
Question· Question écrite17000open
France · National Assembly · 14 July 2026
Mr. Frédéric-Pierre Vos alerts the Minister of Health, Families, Autonomy and Disabled People to the difficulties encountered by childminders in the event of non-payment of their salary by their employer parents. In the constituency of the MP in Oise, they carry out an essential mission of welcoming young children; some childminders are faced with unpaid debts which can reach several thousands of euros. Despite the progress of Pajemploi+, the guarantee remains limited to two months of unpaid debts, which leaves many professionals without a solution when the debt is greater or when the employer is insolvent. This situation is all the more incomprehensible given that parents can receive public aid intended to finance childcare, in particular the free choice of childcare supplement, without that these sums can necessarily be mobilized to pay the salaries owed. Even after a favorable court decision, childminders may find themselves effectively unable to recover their remuneration. This is why he asks what measures the Government intends to take to really secure the payment of the salaries of childminders, in particular by extending the guarantee Pajemploi+, the creation of a national salary guarantee fund and the establishment of a mechanism preventing the payment of public aid when the parent employer does not pay the professional concerned or a garnishment of wages.
Question· Question écrite11785answered
France · National Assembly · 16 December 2025
Mr. Frédéric-Pierre Vos draws the attention of the Minister for Europe and Foreign Affairs to the alarming situation of Mr. Tayeb Benabderrahmane, a French citizen victim of arbitrary detention, torture, judicial falsification and sentenced to death in absentia in Qatar following a secret trial. On 27 November 2025, in her response to written question E-004112/2025, the High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs officially recognized the seriousness of this matter. She confirmed that the European Union fully shared the conclusions of Opinion No. 28/2025 of the United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention (GTDA), which established that Mr. Benabderrahmane was arbitrarily detained, tortured and deprived of his right to a fair trial. The Union also indicated that it regularly urges Qatar to implement these recommendations. Yet, despite these unequivocal conclusions and the expiration of the six-month deadline set by the GTDA for the implementation of its recommendations, no tangible measures have been taken by Qatar to annul the death sentence, compensate the victim or prosecute those responsible. Even more worrying, no visible action has been taken by the French authorities to ensure the diplomatic protection of this French national, despite repeated alerts from the press, several parliamentarians and independent organizations since 2020. This silence painfully contrasts with the humanist values that France proclaims on the international scene, particularly in its fight for the universal abolition of the death penalty. France, which recently paid tribute to Robert Badinter by carrying his memory to the Pantheon, cannot be content with celebrating the words of righteous without prolonging their work. As the President of the Republic recalled: “The dead listen to us”. If he hears us, Robert Badinter would not fail to question France's loyalty to the ideal he defended: that of a State for which human dignity is never negotiated. Leaving a French citizen exposed to an arbitrary execution, pronounced following a secret and illegal trial, would constitute a moral fault and major policy. Such a renunciation would seriously weaken France's international credibility on the eve of the 9th World Congress against the death penalty, which Paris will host from June 30 to July 3, 2026. It would be incomprehensible for France to chair such an event in the name of human rights while remaining silent on the fate of one of its citizens, recognized as tortured by the United Nations. Furthermore, ongoing negotiations between the European Union and Qatar for a strategic partnership agreement constitute an essential diplomatic lever. The official position of the Union now makes compliance with the GTDA recommendations a test of credibility of the future EU-Qatar partnership. He asks him how France justifies not having taken any public position or taken any visible action in the affair of Mr. Benabderrahmane, while the European Union has adopted a clear and demanding official position; why France did not request, like the European Union, the immediate implementation of opinion no. 28/2025 of the GTDA, when the six-month deadline set by the UN has expired; whether France will support, as part of the EU-Qatar strategic partnership negotiations, an explicit condition linking any progress in the partnership to compliance with the GTDA recommendations in the case of Mr. Benabderrahmane; finally, how France can defend the universal cause of the abolition of the death penalty - in particular by hosting the 9th World Congress against the death penalty - while remaining silent on a French citizen tortured and sentenced to death abroad.
Question· Question écrite9647answered
France · National Assembly · 9 September 2025
Mr. Frédéric-Pierre Vos draws the attention of the Minister for Europe and Foreign Affairs to the dramatic situation of Mr. Tayeb Benabderrahmane, a French citizen, sentenced to death in absentia in Qatar in May 2023, following a secret and manifestly unfair trial. In its opinion No. 28/2025, adopted on April 8, 2025, the United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention (GTDA) concluded that Mr. Benabderrahmane was arbitrarily detained (category I), deprived of liberty due to the exercise of his freedom of expression and opinion (category II), victim of serious violations of the right to a fair trial, accompanied by acts of torture and inhuman treatment (category III). The UN ordered Qatar, within six months, to open an independent investigation, prosecute those responsible, fully compensate Mr. Benabderrahmane and take any necessary reparation measures. These violations constitute serious breaches of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Convention against Torture, the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations of 1963 as well as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. It also appears that this death sentence constitutes a retaliatory measure directly linked to the complaints filed by Mr. Benabderrahmane, after having suffered in Qatar acts of kidnapping, torture and arbitrary detention for 307 days. Despite the numerous alerts sent since March 2020, relayed by the press and by several parliamentarians, the Ministry of Europe and Foreign Affairs has provided neither effective consular assistance nor diplomatic protection, allowing a situation to worsen which today exposes a French national to the death penalty, abolished in the country since more than forty years. Given the seriousness of the conclusions rendered by the UN and France's primary obligation to protect its citizens, he asks: what concrete measures has the Government taken to ensure the protection of Mr. Benabderrahmane and his family; what diplomatic steps are being taken or envisaged so that Qatar implements the UN recommendations without delay, particularly in terms of compensation, prosecution of those responsible and security guarantees; how it intends to guarantee, in the future, that France will act with the same firmness and effectiveness for any citizen who is the victim of serious violations of their fundamental rights abroad, including when the case presents a high political or diplomatic sensitivity.
Question· Question écrite6732open
France · National Assembly · 20 May 2025
Mr. Frédéric-Pierre Vos draws the attention of the Minister of Ecological Transition, Biodiversity, Forests, Sea and Fisheries to the legal limitation of the power of electrically assisted bicycles (VAE) to a level insufficient for normal use on certain types of journey. Electric-assisted bicycles have their maximum speed limited to 25 kilometers per hour and the power of their motor to 250 watts (Road Code, art. R. 311-1, 6.11). This last limit does not allow the crossing of more or less steep hills, which prevents normal use by certain users on their journey. However, these devices are precisely designed to replace thermal modes of transport in daily journeys as much as possible, including for people who do not have the physical strength necessary to use a conventional bicycle. That assume at a minimum that they work on the hills. If the speed limit is amply justified by safety requirements, the power limit seems less relevant from this point of view. On the contrary, greater power would make the journey safer if we consider the risk of falling inherent in an involuntary stop on a slope. The power of electric scooters, although lighter, is also limited to 550 watts for a maximum speed of also 25 kilometers per hour. He asks him if the Government intends to provide a solution to this problem, in line with the stated desire to promote what is commonly called “soft mobility”, for example by increasing the maximum power of VAEs.
Question· Question écrite2397answered
France · National Assembly · 26 November 2024
Mr. Frédéric-Pierre Vos questions the Minister of Partnership with Territories and Decentralization on the consistency of the regulations applicable to hedge trimming along rural roads. The provisions relating to hedge trimming seem to contradict each other. Indeed, article D. 161-24 of the rural and maritime fishing code, applicable specifically to hedges on rural roads, provides in particular that the latter must be “conducted directly above the limit of rural roads” and freed from any branches or roots so as to safeguard the safety and convenience of passage. However, the provisions concerning the conditionality of aid under the common agricultural policy, in particular article D. 614-52 of the same code, provide for a ban on trimming hedges from March 16 to August 15, the bird nesting period. However, they do not specify not if this ban applies only to agricultural areas eligible for aid from the common agricultural policy (CAP) or to hedges in general. Thus, uncertainty remains as to whether the obligation to trim hedges along rural roads is also valid between March 16 and August 15. Among the economic consequences, we can cite the disruption of the schedules of pruning companies in roads, who can no longer carry out this work for a certain period, or even cancel projects, with consequences for employment. In addition, the period considered is that when vegetation grows and advances the fastest, so that the absence of pruning can lead to the total obstruction of a path, harming the safety of those who use it. He asks him how these provisions should be interpreted and whether the Government intends to resolve differences of understanding by including the solution in the texts.