Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Defence

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

166 records in EU in 2021

All countriesUnited States · 41,749Ireland · 23,760United Kingdom · 15,991Germany · 5,712France · 4,098Netherlands · 3,840Austria · 3,566European Union · 2,430Belgium · 5Search this topic

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0719decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 March 2021.#FMC Corporation v European Commission.#Plant-protection products – Active substance flupyrsulfuron-methyl – Non-renewal of inclusion in the Annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 – Assessment procedure – Proposed classification of an active substance – Precautionary principle – Rights of defence – Legal certainty – Manifest error of assessment – Proportionality – Principle of non-discrimination – Principle of sound administration – Legitimate expectations.#Case T-719/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 March 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0258_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 February 2021.#Oleksandr Viktorovych Klymenko v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken having regard to the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of the persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Obligation of the Council of the European Union to verify that that decision was taken in accordance with the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-258/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 February 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0258decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 February 2021.#Oleksandr Viktorovych Klymenko v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken having regard to the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of the persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Obligation of the Council of the European Union to verify that that decision was taken in accordance with the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-258/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 February 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0017decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 3 February 2021.#Giulia Moi v European Parliament.#Institutional law – European Parliament – Psychological harassment – Decisions of the President of the Parliament finding that two accredited parliamentary assistants suffered harassment and imposing on a Member of Parliament the penalty of forfeiture of entitlement to the daily subsistence allowance for a period of 12 days – Rules 11 and 166 of the Rules of Procedure of the Parliament – Internal appeal – Decision of the Bureau of the Parliament confirming the penalty – Rule 167 of the Rules of Procedure of the Parliament – Action for annulment – Time limit for bringing an action – Admissibility – Rights of the defence – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-17/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 February 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0017_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 3 February 2021.#Giulia Moi v European Parliament.#Institutional law – European Parliament – Psychological harassment – Decisions of the President of the Parliament finding that two accredited parliamentary assistants suffered harassment and imposing on a Member of Parliament the penalty of forfeiture of entitlement to the daily subsistence allowance for a period of 12 days – Rules 11 and 166 of the Rules of Procedure of the Parliament – Internal appeal – Decision of the Bureau of the Parliament confirming the penalty – Rule 167 of the Rules of Procedure of the Parliament – Action for annulment – Time limit for bringing an action – Admissibility – Rights of the defence – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-17/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 February 2021

Report· CCCELEX 62019CC0742decided

Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 28 January 2021.#B. K. v Republika Slovenija (Ministrstvo za obrambo).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of the safety and health of workers – Organisation of working time – Members of the armed forces – Applicability of EU law – Article 4(2) TEU – Directive 2003/88/EC – Scope – Article 1(3) – Directive 89/391/EEC – Article 2(2) – Military activities – Concept of ‘working time’ – Stand-by period – Dispute concerning the remuneration of a worker.#Case C-742/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 January 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0009_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 27 January 2021.#ClientEarth v European Investment Bank.#Environment – Financing of a biomass power generation plant in Galicia – Resolution of the Board of Directors of the EIB approving the financing – Access to justice in environmental matters – Articles 9 and 10 of the Aarhus Convention – Articles 10 to 12 of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Request for an internal review – Refusal of the request as inadmissible – Action for annulment – Admissibility of a ground of defence – Obligation to state reasons – Concept of an act adopted under environmental law – Concept of an act having a legally binding and external effect.#Case T-9/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 January 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0009decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 27 January 2021.#ClientEarth v European Investment Bank.#Environment – Financing of a biomass power generation plant in Galicia – Resolution of the Board of Directors of the EIB approving the financing – Access to justice in environmental matters – Articles 9 and 10 of the Aarhus Convention – Articles 10 to 12 of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Request for an internal review – Refusal of the request as inadmissible – Action for annulment – Admissibility of a ground of defence – Obligation to state reasons – Concept of an act adopted under environmental law – Concept of an act having a legally binding and external effect.#Case T-9/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 January 2021

Report· XGCELEX 52021XG0118(02)open

The following information is brought to the attention of ABDOLLAHI Hamed, AL NASSER, Abdelkarim Hussein Mohamed, AL-YACOUB, Ibrahim Salih Mohammed, ARBABSIAR Manssor, IZZ-AL-DIN, Hasan, MOHAMMED, Khalid Shaikh, SHAHLAI Abdul Reza, SHAKURI Ali Gholam, ‘Hizballah Military Wing’, ‘EJÉRCITO DE LIBERACIÓN NACIONAL’ (‘National Liberation Army’), POPULAR FRONT FOR THE LIBERATION OF PALESTINE (PFLP), POPULAR FRONT FOR THE LIBERATION OF PALESTINE-GENERAL COMMAND and ‘SENDERO LUMINOSO’ – ‘SL’ (‘Shining Path’), persons and groups included on the list of persons, groups and entities subject to Articles 2, 3 and 4 of Council Common Position 2001/931/CFSP on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism and to Council Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism (see Annexes to Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/1132 and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1128) 2021/C 18/03

European Union · Council of the European Union · 18 January 2021

PreviousPage 4 of 4