Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

601 records in EU in 2022

All countriesEuropean Union · 19,773Ireland · 5,714United Kingdom · 1,357Netherlands · 778France · 494Germany · 293Austria · 142United States · 141Belgium · 1Search this topic

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0009decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 September 2022.#Olimp Laboratories sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union trade mark – Application for the European Union word mark VITA-MIN MULTIPLE SPORT – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Lack of distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-9/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 September 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0699decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 September 2022.#Peace United Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark MY BOYFRIEND IS OUT OF TOWN – Declaration of revocation – Absence of genuine use of the mark – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Proof of genuine use – Abuse of rights.#Case T-699/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 September 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0156_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 September 2022.#Völkl GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark Marker Völkl – Earlier EU word mark VÖLKL – Relative ground for invalidity – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity between the goods – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-156/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 September 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0699_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 September 2022.#Peace United Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark MY BOYFRIEND IS OUT OF TOWN – Declaration of revocation – Absence of genuine use of the mark – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Proof of genuine use – Abuse of rights.#Case T-699/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 September 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0217_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 September 2022.#SB v European Union Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice.#Civil service – Contract staff – Staff of eu-LISA – Dismissal decision at the end of the probationary period – Obligation to state reasons – Normal probationary conditions – Right to be heard – Procedural irregularities – Duty of care – Manifest error of assessment – Principle of sound administration.#Case T-217/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 September 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0156decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 September 2022.#Völkl GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark Marker Völkl – Earlier EU word mark VÖLKL – Relative ground for invalidity – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity between the goods – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-156/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 September 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0730_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 September 2022.#Sławomir Łosowski v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark KOMBI – Earlier EU word mark kombii – Relative ground for invalidity – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the signs – Similarity of the goods and services – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Reliance on an individual right to use the name ‘kombi’ under national law.#Case T-730/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 September 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0470decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 September 2022.#DD v European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights.#Civil service – Temporary staff – Disciplinary regime – Removal from post – Opening of an administrative investigation – Initiation of disciplinary proceedings – Requirement for impartiality – Error of law – Manifest error of assessment – Articles 11, 12 and 21 of the Staff Regulations – Duty of loyalty – Legal certainty – Freedom of expression – Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Principle of sound administration – Duty of care – Presumption of innocence – Right to be heard – Reasonable period of time – Proportionality of the sanction.#Case T-470/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 September 2022

Record· TOCELEX 62022TO0075decided

Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 September 2022.#Yevgeniy Viktorovich Prigozhin v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken against serious human rights violations and abuses – Grounds of the decisions mentioning the applicant’s name as the financier of the Wagner Group – Assessments made in the grounds of the decisions – Acts not open to appeal – Inadmissibility.#Case T-75/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 September 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0730decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 September 2022.#Sławomir Łosowski v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark KOMBI – Earlier EU word mark kombii – Relative ground for invalidity – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the signs – Similarity of the goods and services – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Reliance on an individual right to use the name ‘kombi’ under national law.#Case T-730/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 September 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0155decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 September 2022.#Völkl GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark Völkl – Earlier EU word mark Völkl – Earlier EU word mark VÖLKL – Relative ground for invalidity – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity between the goods – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-155/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 September 2022

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0095_SUMdecided

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 September 2022.#Proceedings brought by Delgaz Grid SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Article 82 TFEU – Right to information in criminal proceedings – Right of a person to be informed of the charges brought against him or her – Directive 2012/13/EU – Article 6(1) – Scope – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Effective judicial protection – Challenge to the excessive length of criminal proceedings – National legislation allowing such a challenge to be made only by persons with the status of suspect or accused person – Article 267 TFEU – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Clear lack of jurisdiction.#Case C-95/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 September 2022

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0095decided

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 September 2022.#Proceedings brought by Delgaz Grid SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Judecătoria Târgu Mureş.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Article 82 TFEU – Right to information in criminal proceedings – Right of a person to be informed of the charges brought against him or her – Directive 2012/13/EU – Article 6(1) – Scope – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Effective judicial protection – Challenge to the excessive length of criminal proceedings – National legislation allowing such a challenge to be made only by persons with the status of suspect or accused person – Article 267 TFEU – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Clear lack of jurisdiction.#Case C-95/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 September 2022

Record· COCELEX 62021CO0113_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 September 2022.#Maen Haikal v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken against the Syrian Arab Republic – Measures directed against leading businesspersons operating in Syria – Lists of persons subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Proof that the inclusion of the appellant’s name on those lists is well founded – Appeal manifestly inadmissible or manifestly unfounded.#Case C-113/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 September 2022

Record· COCELEX 62021CO0113decided

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 September 2022.#Maen Haikal v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken against the Syrian Arab Republic – Measures directed against leading businesspersons operating in Syria – Lists of persons subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Proof that the inclusion of the appellant’s name on those lists is well founded – Appeal manifestly inadmissible or manifestly unfounded.#Case C-113/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 September 2022

Proposal· PCCELEX 52022PC0439open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the International Maritime Organization during the 106th session of the Maritime Safety Committee and the 79th session of the Marine Environment Protection Committee on the adoption of amendments to the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS), the International Code on the Enhanced Programme of Inspections during Surveys of Bulk Carriers and Oil Tankers, 2011 (2011 ESP Code) and to the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (‘MARPOL’) Annex VI

European Union · European Commission · 6 September 2022

Proposal· PCCELEX 52022PC0403open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the Joint Committee established by the Framework Agreement on Partnership and Cooperation between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Mongolia, of the other part, in connection with the envisaged adoption of a decision concerning the establishment of a Development Cooperation Working Group

European Union · European Commission · 22 August 2022

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0004_SUMdecided

Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 17 August 2022.#St. Jude Medical Coordination Center (SJM Coordination Center) v Magnetrol International NV and European Commission.#Appeal – Intervention – State aid – Aid scheme implemented by the Kingdom of Belgium – Application to intervene submitted after the expiry of the six-week time limit provided for in Article 143(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court – Admissibility – Articles 40 and 45 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-4/22 P(I).

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 August 2022

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0004decided

Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 17 August 2022.#St. Jude Medical Coordination Center (SJM Coordination Center) v Magnetrol International NV and European Commission.#Appeal – Intervention – State aid – Aid scheme implemented by the Kingdom of Belgium – Application to intervene submitted after the expiry of the six-week time limit provided for in Article 143(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court – Admissibility – Articles 40 and 45 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-4/22 P(I).

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 August 2022

PreviousPage 12 of 13Next