Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

701 records in EU in 2023

All countriesEuropean Union · 19,773Ireland · 5,714United Kingdom · 1,357Netherlands · 778France · 494Germany · 293Austria · 142United States · 141Belgium · 1Search this topic

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0244_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 26 July 2023.#Viktor Pavlovych Pshonka v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-244/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 July 2023

Record· TOCELEX 62023TO0286decided

Order of the President of the General Court of 26 July 2023.#OT v Council of the European Union.#Interim relief – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of Russia’s actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Application for interim measures – No urgency.#Case T-286/23 R.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 July 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0638decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 July 2023.#Apart sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark representing the outline of a bear – Partial revocation – Genuine use of the trade mark – Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Proof of genuine use.#Case T-638/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 July 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0067decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 26 July 2023.#Guma Holdings LTD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Figurative mark XTRADE – Relative ground for invalidity – Article 8(4) and Article 53(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) and Article 60(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-67/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 July 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0439decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 July 2023.#Rada Perfumery SRL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark RADA PERFUMES – Earlier EU figurative marks PRADA – Earlier EU figurative mark PRADA MILANO DAL 1913 – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-439/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 July 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0663decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 26 July 2023.#Mood Media Netherlands BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark RADIO MOOD In-store Radio, made easy – Earlier EU figurative mark MOOD:MIX – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-663/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 July 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0243decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 26 July 2023.#Artem Viktorovych Pshonka v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-243/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 July 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0244decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 26 July 2023.#Viktor Pavlovych Pshonka v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-244/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 July 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0745decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 26 July 2023.#Rotkäppchen-Mumm Sektkellereien GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark Passo Lungo – Earlier national word mark Doppio Passo – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-745/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 July 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0244decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 26 July 2023.#Luossavaara-Kiirunavaara AB v European Commission.#Environment – Directive 2003/87/EC – System for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading – Transitional free allocation of greenhouse gas emission allowances – Installations producing a product which is not covered by a product benchmark – No direct substitutability between the products – Rejection of data relating to the free allocation of allowances concerning those installations – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest errors of assessment – Equal treatment – Duty of diligence – International obligations and commitments of the European Union – Plea of illegality.#Case T-244/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 July 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0315decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 26 July 2023.#Yayla Türk Lebensmittelvertrieb GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark Sütat – Absolute ground for invalidity – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Right to be heard.#Case T-315/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 July 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0664decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 26 July 2023.#Mood Media Netherlands BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark VIDEO MOOD Digital Signage, made easy – Earlier EU figurative mark MOOD:MIX – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-664/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 July 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0776decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) of 26 July 2023.#Robert Stockdale v Council of the European Union and Others.#Action for annulment and compensation – International contracted staff with the European Union Special Representative in Bosnia and Herzegovina – Common foreign and security policy – Termination of the employment contract following the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union – Jurisdiction of the EU Courts – Contractual nature of the dispute – Absence of arbitration clause and jurisdiction clause – Articles 263, 268, 272 and 274 TFEU – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Admissibility – Identification of the defendants – Concept of ‘body, office or agency of the Union’ – Partial lack of competence and inadmissibility.#Case T-776/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 July 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0562_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 July 2023.#Worldwide Brands, Inc. Zweigniederlassung Deutschland and Guangdong Camel Apparel Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark CAMEL CROWN – International registration of the earlier figurative mark camel active – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Joined Cases T-562/21 and T-590/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 July 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0664_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 26 July 2023.#Mood Media Netherlands BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark VIDEO MOOD Digital Signage, made easy – Earlier EU figurative mark MOOD:MIX – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-664/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 July 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0244_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 26 July 2023.#Luossavaara-Kiirunavaara AB v European Commission.#Environment – Directive 2003/87/EC – System for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading – Transitional free allocation of greenhouse gas emission allowances – Installations producing a product which is not covered by a product benchmark – No direct substitutability between the products – Rejection of data relating to the free allocation of allowances concerning those installations – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest errors of assessment – Equal treatment – Duty of diligence – International obligations and commitments of the European Union – Plea of illegality.#Case T-244/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 July 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0638_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 July 2023.#Apart sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark representing the outline of a bear – Partial revocation – Genuine use of the trade mark – Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Proof of genuine use.#Case T-638/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 July 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0663_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 26 July 2023.#Mood Media Netherlands BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark RADIO MOOD In-store Radio, made easy – Earlier EU figurative mark MOOD:MIX – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-663/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 July 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0562decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 July 2023.#Worldwide Brands, Inc. Zweigniederlassung Deutschland and Guangdong Camel Apparel Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark CAMEL CROWN – International registration of the earlier figurative mark camel active – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Joined Cases T-562/21 and T-590/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 July 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0439_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 July 2023.#Rada Perfumery SRL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark RADA PERFUMES – Earlier EU figurative marks PRADA – Earlier EU figurative mark PRADA MILANO DAL 1913 – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-439/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 July 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0107_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 July 2023.#Criminal proceedings against C.I. and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of the financial interests of the European Union – Article 325(1) TFEU – PFI Convention – Article 2(1) – Obligation to counter fraud affecting the financial interests of the European Union by taking effective deterrent measures – Obligation to provide for criminal penalties – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Serious VAT fraud – Limitation period for criminal liability – Judgment of a constitutional court invalidating a national provision governing the grounds for interrupting that period – Systemic risk of impunity – Protection of fundamental rights – Article 49(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principle that offences and penalties must be defined by law – Requirements of foreseeability and precision of criminal law – Principle of the retroactive application of the more lenient criminal law (lex mitior) – Principle of legal certainty – National standard of protection of fundamental rights – Duty on the courts of a Member State to disapply judgments of the constitutional court and/or the supreme court of that Member State in the event that they are incompatible with EU law – Disciplinary liability of judges in the event of non-compliance with those judgments – Principle of the primacy of EU law.#Case C-107/23 PPU.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 July 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0107decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 July 2023.#Criminal proceedings against C.I. and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Braşov.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of the financial interests of the European Union – Article 325(1) TFEU – PFI Convention – Article 2(1) – Obligation to counter fraud affecting the financial interests of the European Union by taking effective deterrent measures – Obligation to provide for criminal penalties – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Serious VAT fraud – Limitation period for criminal liability – Judgment of a constitutional court invalidating a national provision governing the grounds for interrupting that period – Systemic risk of impunity – Protection of fundamental rights – Article 49(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principle that offences and penalties must be defined by law – Requirements of foreseeability and precision of criminal law – Principle of the retroactive application of the more lenient criminal law (lex mitior) – Principle of legal certainty – National standard of protection of fundamental rights – Duty on the courts of a Member State to disapply judgments of the constitutional court and/or the supreme court of that Member State in the event that they are incompatible with EU law – Disciplinary liability of judges in the event of non-compliance with those judgments – Principle of the primacy of EU law.#Case C-107/23 PPU.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 July 2023

Record· TOCELEX 62022TO0743(02)_INFdecided

Order of the President of the General Court of 19 July 2023.#Nikita Dmitrievich Mazepin v Council of the European Union.#Interim relief – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of Russian actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Application for interim measures – Prima facie case – Urgency – Weighing up of interests.#Case T-743/22 RII.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 July 2023

Record· TOCELEX 62022TO0743(02)decided

Order of the President of the General Court of 19 July 2023.#Nikita Dmitrievich Mazepin v Council of the European Union.#Interim relief – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of Russian actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Application for interim measures – Prima facie case – Urgency – Weighing up of interests.#Case T-743/22 RII.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 July 2023

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0094_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 17 July 2023.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-94/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 July 2023

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0270_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 17 July 2023.#Topcart GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-270/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 July 2023

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0280_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 17 July 2023.#Canai Technology Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-280/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 July 2023

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0145_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 17 July 2023.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-145/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 July 2023

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0280decided

Order of the Court of 17 July 2023.#Canai Technology Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-280/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 July 2023

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0145decided

Order of the Court of 17 July 2023.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-145/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 July 2023

PreviousPage 14 of 15Next