Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

901 records in EU in 2019

All countriesEuropean Union · 19,773France · 7,181Ireland · 5,714United Kingdom · 1,357Netherlands · 778Germany · 304Austria · 222United States · 141Belgium · 1Estonia · 1Search this topic

Records

Report· CCCELEX 62017CC0663decided

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 11 April 2019.#European Central Bank (ECB) and Others v Trasta Komercbanka and Others.#Appeal — Admissibility — Representation of a party before the Court — Power of attorney given to the lawyer — Power of attorney withdrawn by the liquidator of the appellant company — Further steps in the proceedings by the decision-making body of the appellant company — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Right to an effective remedy — Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 — Prudential supervision of credit institutions — Decision to withdraw a credit institution’s authorisation — Action for annulment before the General Court of the European Union — Admissibility — Whether the shareholders of the company whose authorisation has been withdrawn are directly concerned.#Joined Cases C-663/17 P, C-665/17 P and C-669/17 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 April 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0655decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 11 April 2019.#Industria de Diseño Textil, SA (Inditex) v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark ZARA TANZANIA ADVENTURES — Earlier EU word marks ZARA — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Unfair advantage taken of the distinctive character or the repute of the earlier trade marks — Detriment to the distinctive character or the repute of the earlier trade marks.#Case T-655/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 April 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0477decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 11 April 2019.#Užstato sistemos administratorius VšĮ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for an EU figurative mark representing a bottle and an arrow — Earlier EU figurative mark representing a can, a bottle and an arrow — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-477/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 April 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62017CC0482decided

Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston delivered on 11 April 2019.#Czech Republic v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment — Approximation of laws — Directive (EU) 2017/853 — Control of the acquisition and possession of weapons — Validity — Legal basis — Article 114 TFEU — Amendment of an existing directive — Principle of proportionality — Absence of impact assessment — Interference with the right to property — Proportionality of the measures adopted — Measures creating barriers in the internal market — Principle of legal certainty — Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations — Measures obliging Member States to adopt legislation with retroactive effect — Principle of non-discrimination — Derogation for the Swiss Confederation — Discrimination affecting Member States of the European Union or Member States of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) other than that State.#Case C-482/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 April 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0224decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 April 2019.#Adapta Color, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark Bio proof ADAPTA — Declaration of invalidity by the Board of Appeal — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — No distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Infringement of the right to be heard — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001) — Evidence submitted for the first time before the Court.#Case T-224/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 April 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0225decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 April 2019.#Adapta Color, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark Bio proof ADAPTA — Declaration of partial invalidity by the Board of Appeal — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — No distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Infringement of the right to be heard — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001) — Evidence submitted for the first time before the Court.#Case T-225/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 April 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0226decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 April 2019.#Adapta Color, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark Rustproof system ADAPTA — Partial declaration of invalidity by the Board of Appeal — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — No distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Infringement of the right to be heard — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001) — Evidence submitted for the first time before the Court.#Case T-226/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 April 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0223decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 April 2019.#Adapta Color, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark ADAPTA POWDER COATINGS — Declaration of invalidity by the Board of Appeal — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — No distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Infringement of the right to be heard — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001) — Evidence submitted for the first time before the Court.#Case T-223/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 April 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62016TJ0643_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 10 April 2019.#Gamaa Islamya Égypte v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism – Freezing of funds – Whether an authority of a third State can be classified as a competent authority within the meaning of Common Position 2001/931/CFSP – Factual basis of the decisions to freeze funds – Obligation to state reasons – Authentication of Council acts.#Case T-643/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 April 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62016TJ0643decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 10 April 2019.#Gamaa Islamya Égypte v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism – Freezing of funds – Whether an authority of a third State can be classified as a competent authority within the meaning of Common Position 2001/931/CFSP – Factual basis of the decisions to freeze funds – Obligation to state reasons – Authentication of Council acts.#Case T-643/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 April 2019

Decision· DCELEX 32019D0573in force

Council Decision (EU) 2019/573 of 8 April 2019 on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union and its Member States, of the Third Additional Protocol to the Economic Partnership, Political Coordination and Cooperation Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the United Mexican States, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union

European Union · EUR-Lex · 8 April 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62016TJ0910_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 April 2019.#Kurt Hesse and Wedl & Hofmann GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU figurative mark TESTA ROSSA — Partial revocation — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Proof of use — Outward use of the contested mark — Equal treatment.#Cases T-910/16 and T-911/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 April 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0005_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 April 2019 (Extracts).#Ammar Sharif v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Syria — Freezing of funds — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Manifest error of assessment — Right to property — Proportionality — Damage to reputation.#Case T-5/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 April 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0804decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 April 2019.#Stada Arzneimittel AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Application for an EU figurative mark representing two facing arches — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-804/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 April 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0779decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 April 2019.#United Wineries, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark VIÑA ALARDE — Earlier national word mark ‘ALARDE’ — Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Identity of the goods — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-779/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 April 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0373decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 April 2019.#ABB AB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark FLEXLOADER — Absolute grounds for refusal — Lack of descriptive character — Distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Neologism — Insufficiently direct and specific connection with certain goods covered by the mark applied for.#Case T-373/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 April 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62016TJ0910decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 April 2019.#Kurt Hesse and Wedl & Hofmann GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU figurative mark TESTA ROSSA — Partial revocation — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Proof of use — Outward use of the contested mark — Equal treatment.#Cases T-910/16 and T-911/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 April 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0005decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 April 2019 (Extracts).#Ammar Sharif v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Syria — Freezing of funds — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Manifest error of assessment — Right to property — Proportionality — Damage to reputation.#Case T-5/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 April 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0373_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 April 2019.#ABB AB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark FLEXLOADER — Absolute grounds for refusal — Lack of descriptive character — Distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Neologism — Insufficiently direct and specific connection with certain goods covered by the mark applied for.#Case T-373/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 April 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0617_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 April 2019.#Powszechny Zakład Ubezpieczeń na Życie S.A. v Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Competition — Article 82 EC — Abuse of a dominant position — Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Article 3(1) — Application of national competition law — Decision of a national competition authority to impose one fine on the basis of national law and another on the basis of EU law — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 50 — Principle of ne bis in idem — Whether applicable.#Case C-617/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 April 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0617decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 April 2019.#Powszechny Zakład Ubezpieczeń na Życie S.A. v Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Competition — Article 82 EC — Abuse of a dominant position — Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Article 3(1) — Application of national competition law — Decision of a national competition authority to impose one fine on the basis of national law and another on the basis of EU law — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 50 — Principle of ne bis in idem — Whether applicable.#Case C-617/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 April 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62017CC0654decided

Opinion of Advocate General Tanchev delivered on 3 April 2019.#Bayerische Motoren Werke AG and Freistaat Sachsen v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Regional investment aid – Aid for a large investment project – Aid partly incompatible with the internal market – Article 107(3) TFEU – Whether the aid is necessary – Article 108(3) TFEU – Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 – Aid exceeding the individual notification threshold – Notification – Scope of the block exemption – Cross-appeal – Whether an intervention before the General Court of the European Union may proceed – Admissibility.#Case C-654/17 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 April 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0468decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 April 2019.#NSC Holding GmbH & Cie. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark CONDOR SERVICE, NSC — Earlier EU word mark IBERCONDOR — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Relevant public — Similarity of the services — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-468/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 April 2019

PreviousPage 18 of 19Next