Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

1,201 records in EU in 2024

All countriesEuropean Union · 19,773France · 7,181Ireland · 5,714United Kingdom · 1,357Netherlands · 778Germany · 298Austria · 222United States · 141Belgium · 1Estonia · 1Search this topic

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0245_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 20 March 2024.#Braunschweiger Versorgungs AG & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark BF energy – Earlier national word mark BS Energy – Earlier EU trade mark and national figurative marks BS ENERGY – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-245/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 March 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0334_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 20 March 2024.#Isabel Nehera and Others v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative and word marks nehera, NEHERA and NEHERA PRAGUE – Absolute ground for invalidity – No bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Cases T-334/23 to T-337/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 March 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0743decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 20 March 2024.#Nikita Dmitrievich Mazepin v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Change of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Concept of ‘association’ – Error of assessment.#Case T-743/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 March 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0213_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 20 March 2024.#European Federation of Financial Analysts'Societies (EFFAS) v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark CEFA Certified European Financial Analyst – Earlier EU word mark CFA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Coexistence of the marks.#Case T-213/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 March 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0115decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 20 March 2024 (Extracts).#Belshyna AAT v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken because of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Lists of persons, entities and bodies to whom the freezing of funds and economic resources applies – Registering and maintaining the applicant’s name on the lists – Support for Lukashenko’s regime – Financial support – State-owned business – Repression of civil society – Error of assessment.#Case T-115/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 March 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0743_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 20 March 2024.#Nikita Dmitrievich Mazepin v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Change of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Concept of ‘association’ – Error of assessment.#Case T-743/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 March 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0334decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 20 March 2024.#Isabel Nehera and Others v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative and word marks nehera, NEHERA and NEHERA PRAGUE – Absolute ground for invalidity – No bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Cases T-334/23 to T-337/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 March 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0115_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 20 March 2024 (Extracts).#Belshyna AAT v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken because of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Lists of persons, entities and bodies to whom the freezing of funds and economic resources applies – Registering and maintaining the applicant’s name on the lists – Support for Lukashenko’s regime – Financial support – State-owned business – Repression of civil society – Error of assessment.#Case T-115/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 March 2024

Report· CCCELEX 62022CC0535decided

Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta delivered on 14 March 2024.#Aeris Invest Sàrl v European Commission and Single Resolution Board (SRB).#Appeal – Economic and monetary policy – Banking Union – Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms – Resolution procedure applicable where an entity is failing or is likely to fail – Adoption of a resolution scheme in respect of Banco Popular Español SA – Article 18(1) – Conditions for the adoption of a resolution scheme – Obligations of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) – Duty of care – Obligation to state reasons – Article 88 – Obligation of confidentiality – Article 14 – Resolution objectives – Sale of business of the entity concerned – Conditions of sale under which an offer may be accepted – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 17 – Shareholders’ right to property – Validity of Regulation No 806/2014.#Case C-535/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 March 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0516decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 14 March 2024.#European Commission v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Default procedure – Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community – Article 127(1) – Transition period – Jurisdiction of the Court of Justice – Judgment of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom – Enforcement of an arbitral award granting the payment of compensation – Decision of the European Commission declaring that that payment constitutes State aid which is incompatible with the internal market – Article 4(3) TEU – Sincere cooperation – Obligation to stay proceedings – First paragraph of Article 351 TFEU – International agreement between Member States and third countries concluded before the date of their accession to the European Union – Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States (ICSID Convention) – Application of EU law – Article 267 TFEU – National court or tribunal adjudicating at last instance – Obligation to make a reference to the Court for a preliminary ruling – Article 108(3) TFEU – Suspension of implementation of the aid.#Case C-516/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 March 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0516_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 14 March 2024.#European Commission v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Default procedure – Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community – Article 127(1) – Transition period – Jurisdiction of the Court of Justice – Judgment of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom – Enforcement of an arbitral award granting the payment of compensation – Decision of the European Commission declaring that that payment constitutes State aid which is incompatible with the internal market – Article 4(3) TEU – Sincere cooperation – Obligation to stay proceedings – First paragraph of Article 351 TFEU – International agreement between Member States and third countries concluded before the date of their accession to the European Union – Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States (ICSID Convention) – Application of EU law – Article 267 TFEU – National court or tribunal adjudicating at last instance – Obligation to make a reference to the Court for a preliminary ruling – Article 108(3) TFEU – Suspension of implementation of the aid.#Case C-516/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 March 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0291_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 14 March 2024.#Debregeas et associés Pharma (D & A Pharma) v European Commission and European Medicines Agency.#Appeal – Medicinal products for human use – Application for marketing authorisation – Independence of experts consulted by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to good administration – Requirement of objective impartiality – Criteria for verifying the absence of conflict of interest – EMA’s policy on competing interests – Activities as principal investigator, consultant or strategic adviser for the pharmaceutical industry – Rival products – Re-examination procedure – Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 – Articles 56, 62 and 63 – EMA Guidelines – Consultation of a scientific advisory group (SAG) or an ad hoc expert group.#Case C-291/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 March 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0291decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 14 March 2024.#Debregeas et associés Pharma (D & A Pharma) v European Commission and European Medicines Agency.#Appeal – Medicinal products for human use – Application for marketing authorisation – Independence of experts consulted by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to good administration – Requirement of objective impartiality – Criteria for verifying the absence of conflict of interest – EMA’s policy on competing interests – Activities as a principal researcher, consultant or strategic adviser for the pharmaceutical industry – Rival products – Re-examination procedure – Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 – Article 56, Article 62, Article 63 – EMA Guidelines – Consultation of a scientific advisory group (SAG) or an ad hoc expert group.#Case C-291/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 March 2024

Report· DCCELEX 52024DC0119open

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL on the delegation of power to adopt delegated acts conferred on the Commission pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/287 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 February 2019 implementing bilateral safeguard clauses and other mechanisms allowing for the temporary withdrawal of preferences in certain trade agreements concluded between the European Union and third countries

European Union · European Commission · 14 March 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0682_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 13 March 2024.#ClientEarth AISBL and Päivi Leino-Sandberg v Council of the European Union.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Opinion of the Council’s legal service regarding a proposal by the Commission concerning an amendment of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 and regarding advice issued by the Aarhus Committee – Partial refusal to grant access – Exception relating to the protection of legal advice – Legal opinions that are particularly sensitive in nature or have a particularly wide scope going beyond the context of the legislative process in question – Exception relating to the protection of the decision-making process – Exception relating to the protection of the public interest regarding international relations – Overriding public interest.#Joined Cases T-682/21 and T-683/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 March 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0117decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 13 March 2024.#Kantstraße Paris Bar GmBH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark Bar Paris – Earlier EU figurative mark Paris Bar – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-117/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 March 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0117_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 13 March 2024.#Kantstraße Paris Bar GmBH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark Bar Paris – Earlier EU figurative mark Paris Bar – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-117/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 March 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0682decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 13 March 2024.#ClientEarth AISBL and Päivi Leino-Sandberg v Council of the European Union.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Opinion of the Council’s legal service regarding a proposal by the Commission concerning an amendment of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 and regarding advice issued by the Aarhus Committee – Partial refusal to grant access – Exception relating to the protection of legal advice – Legal opinions that are particularly sensitive in nature or have a particularly wide scope going beyond the context of the legislative process in question – Exception relating to the protection of the decision-making process – Exception relating to the protection of the public interest regarding international relations – Overriding public interest.#Joined Cases T-682/21 and T-683/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 March 2024

Decision· DCELEX 32024D0995in force

Council Decision (EU, Euratom) 2024/995 of 12 March 2024 authorising the opening of negotiations with the Swiss Confederation on institutional provisions in agreements between the European Union and the Swiss Confederation related to the internal market, on an agreement on the Swiss Confederation’s participation in Union programmes and on an agreement that forms the basis for the Swiss Confederation’s permanent contribution to the Union’s cohesion

European Union · EUR-Lex · 12 March 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0479_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 March 2024.#OC v European Commission.#Appeal – Actions for damages – Non-contractual liability of the European Union – Alleged unlawful conduct of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) – Press release from OLAF – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies – Regulation (UE) 2018/1725 – Article 3, point 1 – Concepts of ‘personal data’ and of ‘identifiable natural person’ – Investigations conducted by OLAF – Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 – Presumption of innocence – Right to good administration.#Case C-479/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 March 2024

Report· CCCELEX 62022CC0652decided

Opinion of Advocate General Collins delivered on 7 March 2024.#Kolin Inşaat Turizm Sanayi ve Ticaret AȘ v Državna komisija za kontrolu postupaka javne nabave.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Visoki upravni sud.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement in the European Union – Directive 2014/25/EU – Article 43 – Economic operators of a third country which has not concluded an international agreement with the European Union which guarantees access to public procurement in a reciprocal and equal manner – No right on the part of those economic operators to ‘no less favourable’ treatment – Participation of such an economic operator in a public procurement procedure – Inapplicability of Directive 2014/25 – Inadmissibility in the context of an action brought by that economic operator seeking a request for a preliminary ruling concerning the interpretation of provisions of that directive.#Case C-652/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 March 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0479decided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 March 2024.#OC v European Commission.#Appeal – Actions for damages – Non-contractual liability of the European Union – Alleged unlawful conduct of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) – Press release from OLAF – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies – Regulation (UE) 2018/1725 – Article 3, point 1 – Concepts of ‘personal data’ and of ‘identifiable natural person’ – Investigations conducted by OLAF – Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 – Presumption of innocence – Right to good administration.#Case C-479/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 March 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0259_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 6 March 2024.#AAT Mostovdrev v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Belarus – Prohibitions on the import, purchase and transport of products as well as on the provision of services in the sector for wood products originating from Belarus – Obligation to state reasons – Equal treatment – Misuse of powers – Proportionality – Right to property – Freedom to conduct a business.#Case T-259/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 March 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0652_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 March 2024.#Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU trade mark consisting in a shade of orange – Absolute ground for invalidity – Graphic representation that is sufficiently clear and precise – Article 4 and Article 7(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 4 and Article 7(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(1)(b) and (3) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-652/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 March 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0301_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 March 2024.#Vía Atlántica Adegas e Viñedos, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark VIA ATLÁNTICA – Earlier EU figurative mark ATLÂNTICO – Relative grounds for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-301/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 March 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0059_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 6 March 2024.#DEC Technologies BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark DEC FLEXIBLE TECHNOLOGIES and EU figurative mark representing a square with curves – Absolute ground for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Cases T-59/23 and T-68/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 March 2024

PreviousPage 24 of 25Next