Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

1,301 records in EU in 2024

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0746decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 February 2024.#BIW Invest AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Word mark COMPTON – Absolute grounds for invalidity – Lack of descriptiveness – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-746/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 February 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0098decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 28 February 2024.#Atomico Investment Holdings Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark atomic fund – Earlier EU word mark ATOMICO – Lack of evidence of the reputation of the earlier mark – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Remittal of the case to the Opposition Division.#Case T-98/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 February 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0184decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 28 February 2024.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark BERTRAND PUMA La griffe boulangère – Earlier EU figurative mark PUMA – Relative ground for refusal – No damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Link between the marks at issue.#Case T-184/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 February 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0747decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 February 2024.#BIW Invest AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Figurative mark Compton – Absolute grounds for invalidity – Lack of descriptiveness – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-747/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 February 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0279decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 28 February 2024.#Sumol + Compal Marcas SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark smål – Earlier EU figurative mark and earlier national word mark SUMOL – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Identity of the goods – Enhanced distinctiveness of the earlier marks through use – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-279/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 February 2024

Record· TOCELEX 62023TO0102(04)decided

Order of the President of the General Court of 27 February 2024.#SBK Art OOO v Council of the European Union.#Interim measures – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds and economic resources – Application for interim measures – No urgency.#Case T-102/23 R.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 February 2024

Record· TOCELEX 62023TO0102(04)_INFdecided

Order of the President of the General Court of 27 February 2024.#SBK Art OOO v Council of the European Union.#Interim measures – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds and economic resources – Application for interim measures – No urgency.#Case T-102/23 R.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 February 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0382_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 February 2024.#European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) v The KaiKai Company Jaeger Wichmann GbR.#Appeal – Intellectual property – Community designs – Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) – Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights – Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property – Article 4 – Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Article 41 – Application for registration of a Community design – Right of priority – Priority claim based on an international application filed under the PCT – Time period – Interpretation consistent with Article 4 of that convention – Limits.#Case C-382/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 February 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0382decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 February 2024.#European Union Intellectual Property Office v The KaiKai Company Jaeger Wichmann GbR.#Appeal – Intellectual property – Community designs – Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) – Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights – Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property – Article 4 – Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Article 41 – Application for registration of a Community design – Right of priority – Priority claim based on an international application filed under the PCT – Time period – Interpretation consistent with Article 4 of that convention – Limits.#Case C-382/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 February 2024

Decision· DCELEX 32024D0784in force

Council Decision (EU) 2024/784 of 26 February 2024 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe on proposals for modifications to UN regulation Nos 10, 13, 37, 45, 46, 48, 53, 54, 55, 79, 106, 107, 128, 130, 140, 148, 149, 150, 158 and 167, and on a proposal for a new UN regulation on driver control assistance system (DCAS)

European Union · EUR-Lex · 26 February 2024

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0707_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 23 February 2024.#Breville Pty Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-707/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 February 2024

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0707decided

Order of the Court of 23 February 2024.#Breville Pty Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-707/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 February 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0054_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 February 2024.#Romania v European Commission.#Appeal – Law governing the institutions – European Citizens’ Initiative – Regulation (EU) No 211/2011 – Registration of a proposed citizens’ initiative – Article 4(2)(b) – Proposed citizens’ initiative not falling manifestly outside the framework of the European Commission’s powers to submit a proposal for a legal act of the European Union for the purpose of implementing the Treaties – Burden of proof – Power of the Commission to proceed with partial registration.#Case C-54/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 February 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0491_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 February 2024.#WA v Direcţia pentru Evidenţa Persoanelor şi Administrarea Bazelor de Date din Ministerul Afacerilor Interne.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Citizenship of the Union – Article 21(1) TFEU – Right to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States – Article 45 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Directive 2004/38/EC – Article 4 – Issuance of an identity card – Requirement of domicile in the Member State issuing the document – Refusal by the authorities of that Member State to issue an identity card to one of its nationals domiciled in another Member State – Equal treatment – Restrictions – Justification.#Case C-491/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 February 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0054decided

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 February 2024.#Romania v European Commission.#Appeal – Law governing the institutions – European Citizens’ Initiative – Regulation (EU) No 211/2011 – Registration of a proposed citizens’ initiative – Article 4(2)(b) – Proposed citizens’ initiative not falling manifestly outside the framework of the European Commission’s powers to submit a proposal for a legal act of the European Union for the purpose of implementing the Treaties – Burden of proof – Power of the Commission to proceed with partial registration.#Case C-54/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 February 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0491decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 February 2024.#WA v Direcţia pentru Evidenţa Persoanelor şi Administrarea Bazelor de Date din Ministerul Afacerilor Interne.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Citizenship of the Union – Article 21(1) TFEU – Right to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States – Article 45 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Directive 2004/38/EC – Article 4 – Issuance of an identity card – Requirement of domicile in the Member State issuing the document – Refusal by the authorities of that Member State to issue an identity card to one of its nationals domiciled in another Member State – Equal treatment – Restrictions – Justification.#Case C-491/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 February 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0180_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 21 February 2024.#L'Oréal v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark BI blue pigment – Earlier EU figurative mark Bi.cell – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-180/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 February 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0175_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 21 February 2024.#Hong Kong NetEase Interactive Entertainment Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark LifeAfter – Earlier EU word mark life – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-175/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 February 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0082_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 21 February 2024.#Nextrend GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing toilet units (part of – ) – Earlier Community design – Grounds for invalidity – Individual character – Different overall impression – Degree of freedom of the designer – Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-82/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 February 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0765_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 February 2024.#Azalee Cosmetics v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark LA CRÈME LIBRE – Earlier EU word mark LIBRE – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-765/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 February 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0767_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 21 February 2024.#Hoffmann GmbH Qualitätswerkzeuge v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark Holex – Earlier EU figurative mark MOLDEX – Relative ground for refusal – Proof of genuine use – No likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the goods – Similarity of the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-767/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 February 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0117_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 February 2024.#Grodno Azot AAT and Khimvolokno Plant v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Belarus – Freezing of funds – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Concept of ‘support for the regime’ – State-owned enterprise – Error of assessment.#Case T-117/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 February 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0175decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 21 February 2024.#Hong Kong NetEase Interactive Entertainment Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark LifeAfter – Earlier EU word mark life – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-175/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 February 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0082decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 21 February 2024.#Nextrend GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing toilet units (part of – ) – Earlier Community design – Grounds for invalidity – Individual character – Different overall impression – Degree of freedom of the designer – Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-82/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 February 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0117decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 February 2024.#Grodno Azot AAT and Khimvolokno Plant v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Belarus – Freezing of funds – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Concept of ‘support for the regime’ – State-owned enterprise – Error of assessment.#Case T-117/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 February 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0767decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 21 February 2024.#Hoffmann GmbH Qualitätswerkzeuge v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark Holex – Earlier EU figurative mark MOLDEX – Relative ground for refusal – Proof of genuine use – No likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the goods – Similarity of the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-767/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 February 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0715_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 20 February 2024.#K.L. v X sp. z o.o.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 1999/70/EC – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clause 4 – Principle of non-discrimination – Difference in treatment in the event of dismissal – Termination of a fixed-term employment contract – No obligation to state the reasons for termination – Judicial review – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-715/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 February 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0715decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 20 February 2024.#K.L. v X sp. z o.o.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Krakowa - Nowej Huty w Krakowie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 1999/70/EC – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clause 4 – Principle of non-discrimination – Difference in treatment in the event of dismissal – Termination of a fixed-term employment contract – No obligation to state the reasons for termination – Judicial review – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-715/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 February 2024

Proposal· PCCELEX 52024PC0074open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the International Maritime Organization during the 81st session of the Marine Environment Protection Committee and the 108th session of the Maritime Safety Committee on the adoption of amendments to the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL), the Ballast Water Management Convention, the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS), the International Code of Safety for Ships Using Gases or other Low-flashpoint Fuels (IGF Code), the International Code of the Enhanced Programme of Inspections during Surveys of Bulk Carriers and Oil Tankers, 2011 (2011 ESP Code), the International Life-Saving Appliance (LSA) Code, the International Code for Fire Safety Systems (FSS Code) and the Seafarers' Training, Certification and Watchkeeping (STCW) Code.

European Union · European Commission · 20 February 2024

PreviousPage 26 of 27Next