Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

1,401 records in EU in 2023

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0094_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 March 2023.#Kalev Mutondo v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Change of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures.#Case T-94/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 March 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0091_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 March 2023.#Éric Ruhorimbere v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures.#Case T-91/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 March 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0759_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 8 March 2023.#Société des produits Nestlé SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark A 2 – Earlier international registration – Figurative mark THE a2 MILK COMPANY THE a2 MILK COMPANY – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-759/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 March 2023

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0605decided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 8 March 2023.#Hijos de Moisés Rodríguez González, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-605/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 March 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0212_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 8 March 2023.#Violetta Prigozhina v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the list – Family of a person responsible for actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, or stability or security in Ukraine – Concept of ‘association’ – Error of assessment.#Case T-212/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 March 2023

Proposal· PCCELEX 52023PC0107open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the Cooperation Council established by the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Iraq, of the other part, in connection with the envisaged adoption of a decision concerning the establishment of a Sub-Committee on Development Cooperation

European Union · European Commission · 3 March 2023

Decision· DCELEX 32023D0496in force

Council Decision (EU) 2023/496 of 2 March 2023 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe on proposals for modifications to UN regulations Nos 13-H, 30, 48, 51, 53, 67, 78, 105, 110, 116, 117, 121, 125, 131, 138, 140, 148, 149, 150, 152, 157 and 164, and on a proposal for an amendment to the consolidated resolution R.E.5

European Union · EUR-Lex · 2 March 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0477_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 2 March 2023.#IH v MÁV-START Vasúti Személyszállító Zrt.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Protection of the safety and health of workers – Organisation of working time – Article 31(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Directive 2003/88/EC – Articles 3 and 5 – Daily rest and weekly rest – National legislation providing for a minimum weekly rest period of 42 hours – Obligation to grant daily rest – Rules for granting.#Case C-477/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 March 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0268_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 2 March 2023.#Norra Stockholm Bygg AB v Per Nycander AB.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 6(3) and (4) – Lawfulness of processing – Production of a document containing personal data in civil court proceedings – Article 23(1)(f) and (j) – Protection of judicial independence and judicial proceedings – Enforcement of civil law claims – Requirements to be complied with – Having regard to the interests of the data subjects – Balancing of the opposing interests involved – Article 5 – Minimisation of personal data – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 7 – Right to respect for private life – Article 8 – Right to protection of personal data – Article 47 – Right to effective judicial protection – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-268/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 March 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0268decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 2 March 2023.#Norra Stockholm Bygg AB v Per Nycander AB.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta domstolen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 6(3) and (4) – Lawfulness of processing – Production of a document containing personal data in civil court proceedings – Article 23(1)(f) and (j) – Protection of judicial independence and judicial proceedings – Enforcement of civil law claims – Requirements to be complied with – Having regard to the interests of the data subjects – Balancing of the opposing interests involved – Article 5 – Minimisation of personal data – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 7 – Right to respect for private life – Article 8 – Right to protection of personal data – Article 47 – Right to effective judicial protection – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-268/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 March 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0477decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 2 March 2023.#IH v MÁV-START Vasúti Személyszállító Zrt.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Miskolci Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Protection of the safety and health of workers – Organisation of working time – Article 31(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Directive 2003/88/EC – Articles 3 and 5 – Daily rest and weekly rest – National legislation providing for a minimum weekly rest period of 42 hours – Obligation to grant daily rest – Rules for granting.#Case C-477/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 March 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0102decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 March 2023.#Transgourmet Ibérica, SAU v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark Gourmet – Earlier national word mark GOURMET – Relative ground for invalidity – Distinctive character of earlier mark – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Form differing in elements which alter the distinctive character.#Case T-102/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 March 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0217decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 1 March 2023.#Lifestyle Equities CV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark GREENWICH POLO CLUB GPC 2002 – Earlier EU figurative mark BEVERLY HILLS POLO CLUB – Relative ground for invalidity – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity of the goods – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-217/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 March 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0295decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 1 March 2023.#Crush Series Publishing s.r.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark The Crush Series – Earlier EU figurative mark CRUSH – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-295/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 March 2023

Record· TOCELEX 62022TO0743_INFdecided

Order of the President of the General Court of 1 March 2023.#Nikita Dmitrievich Mazepin v Council of the European Union.#Interim relief – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of Russian actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Application for interim measures – Prima facie case – Urgency – Weighing up of interests.#Case T-743/22 R.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 March 2023

Record· TOCELEX 62022TO0743decided

Order of the President of the General Court of 1 March 2023.#Nikita Dmitrievich Mazepin v Council of the European Union.#Interim relief – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of Russian actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Application for interim measures – Prima facie case – Urgency – Weighing up of interests.#Case T-743/22 R.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 March 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0038decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 1 March 2023.#Romedor Pharma SRL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – European Union figurative mark CERVIRON perfect care – Earlier unregistered national trade mark CERVIRON – Relative ground for invalidity – Article 8(4) and Article 60(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-38/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 March 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0025decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 March 2023.#Canai Technology Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark HE&ME – Earlier Benelux word mark ME – Relative ground for refusal – Similarity of the signs – Weak distinctive character of the earlier mark – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-25/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 March 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0552decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 1 March 2023.#Worldwide Brands, Inc. Zweigniederlassung Deutschland v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark CAMEL – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Genuine use of the mark – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001 – No assessment of some of the evidence submitted.#Case T-552/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 March 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0036decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 1 March 2023.#Romedor Pharma SRL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark PERFECT FARMA CERVIRON – Non-registered earlier national trade mark CERVIRON – Relative ground for invalidity – Article 8(4) and Article 53(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) and Article 60(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-36/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 March 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0552_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 1 March 2023.#Worldwide Brands, Inc. Zweigniederlassung Deutschland v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark CAMEL – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Genuine use of the mark – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001 – No assessment of some of the evidence submitted.#Case T-552/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 March 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0217_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 1 March 2023.#Lifestyle Equities CV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark GREENWICH POLO CLUB GPC 2002 – Earlier EU figurative mark BEVERLY HILLS POLO CLUB – Relative ground for invalidity – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity of the goods – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-217/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 March 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0025_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 March 2023.#Canai Technology Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark HE&ME – Earlier Benelux word mark ME – Relative ground for refusal – Similarity of the signs – Weak distinctive character of the earlier mark – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-25/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 March 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0036_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 1 March 2023.#Romedor Pharma SRL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark PERFECT FARMA CERVIRON – Non-registered earlier national trade mark CERVIRON – Relative ground for invalidity – Article 8(4) and Article 53(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) and Article 60(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-36/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 March 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0038_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 1 March 2023.#Romedor Pharma SRL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – European Union figurative mark CERVIRON perfect care – Earlier unregistered national trade mark CERVIRON – Relative ground for invalidity – Article 8(4) and Article 60(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-38/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 March 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0102_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 March 2023.#Transgourmet Ibérica, SAU v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark Gourmet – Earlier national word mark GOURMET – Relative ground for invalidity – Distinctive character of earlier mark – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Form differing in elements which alter the distinctive character.#Case T-102/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 March 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0295_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 1 March 2023.#Crush Series Publishing s.r.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark The Crush Series – Earlier EU figurative mark CRUSH – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-295/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 March 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0695_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 28 February 2023.#Fenix International Limited v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Implementing power of the Council of the European Union – Article 291(2) TFEU – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Articles 28 and 397 – Taxable person, acting in his or her own name but on behalf of another person – Provider of services by electronic means – Implementing Regulation (EU) No 282/2011 – Article 9a – Presumption – Validity.#Case C-695/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 February 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0695decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 28 February 2023.#Fenix International Limited v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Implementing power of the Council of the European Union – Article 291(2) TFEU – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Articles 28 and 397 – Taxable person, acting in his or her own name but on behalf of another person – Provider of services by electronic means – Implementing Regulation (EU) No 282/2011 – Article 9a – Presumption – Validity.#Case C-695/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 February 2023

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0681decided

Order of the Court of 27 February 2023.#Olimp Laboratories sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-681/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 February 2023

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0681_INFdecided

Order of the Court of 27 February 2023.#Olimp Laboratories sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-681/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 February 2023

Proposal· PCCELEX 52023PC0092open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the Joint Committee established by the Framework Agreement on Partnership and Cooperation between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of the Philippines, of the other part, in connection with the envisaged adoption of a decision concerning the establishment of a Sub-committee on Maritime Cooperation

European Union · European Commission · 23 February 2023

PreviousPage 28 of 29Next