Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

251 records in EU in 2024

All countriesEuropean Union · 19,773Ireland · 5,714United Kingdom · 1,357Netherlands · 778France · 493Germany · 293United States · 141Austria · 88Belgium · 1Search this topic

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0614decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 13 November 2024.#Praha Alfa-Med s. r. o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing apparatus and installations for medical or laboratory diagnosis – Prior design – Obligation to state reasons – No individual character – No different overall impression – Informed user – Degree of freedom of the designer – Articles 4 to 6, Article 25(1)(b) and Article 62 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-614/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 November 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0016_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 13 November 2024.#IServ GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark IServ – Earlier national word mark Info Serv – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Legal authenticity of translations – Article 26 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/626.#Case T-16/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 November 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ1169decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 13 November 2024.#Interapothek, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark miababy – Earlier EU figurative mark ia BABY interapothek – Relative grounds for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-1169/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 November 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0082decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 13 November 2024.#Administration of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU figurative mark RUSSIAN WARSHIP, GO F**K YOURSELF – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Political slogan – Equal treatment – Principle of sound administration – Article 71(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-82/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 November 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0082_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 13 November 2024.#Administration of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU figurative mark RUSSIAN WARSHIP, GO F**K YOURSELF – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Political slogan – Equal treatment – Principle of sound administration – Article 71(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-82/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 November 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0064_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 November 2024.#Aesculap AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Applications for EU figurative marks AESKUCARE Food Intolerance and AESKUCARE Allergy and EU word mark AESKUCARE – Earlier EU and national word marks AESCULAP – Relative ground for refusal – Damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Cross-claims.#Joined Cases T-64/23 to T-66/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 November 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0015decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 13 November 2024.#IServ GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark IServ – Earlier national word mark Info Serv – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Legal authenticity of translations – Article 26 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/626.#Case T-15/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 November 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0545decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 November 2024.#G.M.P. Group Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing vehicle wheel rims – Earlier design – Grounds for invalidity – Individual character – Overall impression – Degree of freedom of the designer – Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-545/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 November 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0064decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 November 2024.#Aesculap AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Applications for EU figurative marks AESKUCARE Food Intolerance and AESKUCARE Allergy and EU word mark AESKUCARE – Earlier EU and national word marks AESCULAP – Relative ground for refusal – Damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Cross-claims.#Joined Cases T-64/23 to T-66/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 November 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0221decided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 November 2024.#WS v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Recruitment – Selection procedure EXT/22/08/AD 6/DTD – Business Analyst – Decision not to admit the applicant to the next stage of the procedure – Action for annulment – Rule of correspondence – Article 91(2) of the Staff Regulations – Admissibility – Manifest error of assessment – Liability.#Case T-221/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 November 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0078decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 13 November 2024.#Golden Support s. r. o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark Skyliner – Earlier EU figurative mark SKY – Relative ground for invalidity – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-78/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 November 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0524decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 13 November 2024.#Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Three-dimensional EU trade mark – Shape of an inhaler – Absolute ground for invalidity – Sign which consists exclusively of the shape of goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result – Article 7(1)(e)(ii) and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(e)(ii) and Article 59(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-524/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 November 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0015_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 13 November 2024.#IServ GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark IServ – Earlier national word mark Info Serv – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Legal authenticity of translations – Article 26 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/626.#Case T-15/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 November 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ1127decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 13 November 2024.#Sven Butzkies-Schiemann v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark CorrosionX – Absolute ground for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Admissibility of the response filed before the Board of Appeal – Article 24(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.#Case T-1127/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 November 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0016decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 13 November 2024.#IServ GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark IServ – Earlier national word mark Info Serv – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Legal authenticity of translations – Article 26 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/626.#Case T-16/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 November 2024

Record· TOCELEX 62024TO0257(02)decided

Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 11 November 2024.#Nikita Dmitrievich Mazepin v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Concept of ‘association’ – Article 2(1), in fine, of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Concept of ‘benefit’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145 – Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Error of assessment.#Case T-257/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 November 2024

Record· COCELEX 62024CO0344_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 November 2024.#Christos Papasotiriou v Council of the European Union and European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Appeal brought without the assistance of a lawyer – Appeal manifestly inadmissible.#Case C-344/24 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 November 2024

Record· TOCELEX 62024TO0257(02)_INFdecided

Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 11 November 2024.#Nikita Dmitrievich Mazepin v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Concept of ‘association’ – Article 2(1), in fine, of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Concept of ‘benefit’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145 – Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Error of assessment.#Case T-257/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 November 2024

Record· COCELEX 62024CO0344decided

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 November 2024.#Christos Papasotiriou v Council of the European Union and European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Appeal brought without the assistance of a lawyer – Appeal manifestly inadmissible.#Case C-344/24 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 November 2024

Record· COCELEX 62024CO0439decided

Order of the Court of 8 November 2024.#VDS Czmyr Kowalik sp.k. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-439/24 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 November 2024

Report· CCCELEX 62023CC0460decided

Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 7 November 2024.#OB v Procura della Repubblica presso il Tribunale di Bologna.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Bologna.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Border controls, asylum and immigration – Directive 2002/90/EC – General offence of facilitation of unauthorised entry, transit and residence – Article 1(1)(a) – Interpretation consistent with the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 7 – Respect for private and family life – Article 24 – Rights of the child – Article 52(1) – Interference with the essence of fundamental rights – Article 18 – Right to asylum – Person bringing into the territory of a Member State, in an unauthorised manner, minors who are third-country nationals accompanying him or her and over whom he or she exercises actual care.#Case C-460/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 November 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0178decided

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 November 2024.#ERB New Europe Funding II v YI.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Specializat Mureş.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Article 7(1) – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Powers and obligations of the national court – First legal remedy pursued by the consumer before the court of the place where the seller or supplier has its registered office, without the assistance of a lawyer and without that consumer attending the hearing – Second legal remedy pursued by the consumer before the court of his or her place of domicile, with the assistance of a lawyer – Res judicata – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Effective judicial protection of the consumer.#Case C-178/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 November 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ1100_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 November 2024.#IN tIME Express Logistik GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU figurative mark inTime Agile Logistics – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-1100/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 November 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0359_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 November 2024.#Société des produits Nestlé SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark THE ONLY ONE by alphaspirit wild and perfect – Earlier EU word mark ONE – Relative grounds for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Decision taken following the annulment of an earlier decision by the General Court – Article 72(6) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Res judicata – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-359/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 November 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0425_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 6 November 2024.#Consejo Regulador de la Indicación Geográfica Protegida «Aceite de Jaén» v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark VEGA DEL OBISPO BIO Jaén PRODUCTOS ECOLOGICOS – Absolute grounds for invalidity – Article 7(1)(f), (g) and (j) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Admissibility of the evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 95(1) and (2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Right to be heard – Article 94(1), second sentence, of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-425/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 November 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ1091_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 November 2024.#Freddo Freddo, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark doffre – International registration of the earlier figurative mark Freddo Freddo – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-1091/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 November 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ1100decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 November 2024.#IN tIME Express Logistik GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU figurative mark inTime Agile Logistics – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-1100/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 November 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ1146_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 November 2024.#W. L. Gore & Associates Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark Cardioflow – Earlier EU word mark CARDIOFORM – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-1146/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 November 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0118_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 November 2024.#House of Prince A/S v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark AROMA KING – Earlier national word mark KING’S – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Enhanced distinctiveness of the earlier mark – No independent distinctive role.#Case T-118/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 November 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0544_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 November 2024.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for an EU figurative mark representing an emblem – Earlier EU figurative marks representing a stripe – Relative ground for refusal – No similarity of the signs – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-544/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 November 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0561_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 November 2024.#CFA Institute v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark CCA CHARTERED CONTROLLER ANALYST CERTIFICATE – Earlier EU word mark CFA and earlier EU figurative mark CFA CHARTERED FINANCIAL ANALYST – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – New decision taken following annulment in part of an earlier decision by the Court – Scope of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal – Res judicata.#Case T-561/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 November 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0507_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 6 November 2024.#ZB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark ENERGY DRINK – Earlier EU figurative mark X Energy Drink – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-507/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 November 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0136_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 November 2024.#Vintae Luxury Wine Specialists SLU v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark Vintae – Earlier national word mark VITAE – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – No limitation in consequence of acquiescence – Article 53(2) of Regulation No 40/94.#Case T-136/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 November 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ1091decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 November 2024.#Freddo Freddo, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark doffre – International registration of the earlier figurative mark Freddo Freddo – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-1091/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 November 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0425decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 6 November 2024.#Consejo Regulador de la Indicación Geográfica Protegida 'Aceite de Jaén' v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark VEGA DEL OBISPO BIO Jaén PRODUCTOS ECOLOGICOS – Absolute grounds for invalidity – Article 7(1)(f), (g) and (j) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Admissibility of the evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 95(1) and (2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Right to be heard – Article 94(1), second sentence, of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-425/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 November 2024

PreviousPage 5 of 6Next