Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

401 records in EU in 2023

All countriesEuropean Union · 19,773Ireland · 5,714United Kingdom · 1,357Netherlands · 778France · 494Germany · 293United States · 141Austria · 93Belgium · 1Search this topic

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0402decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 18 October 2023.#Zippo Manufacturing Co. and Others v European Commission.#Commercial policy – Regulation (EU) 2020/502 – Measures adopted by the United States on imports of certain derivative aluminium and steel products – European Union decision to suspend equivalent trade concessions and other obligations – Additional customs duties on imports of products originating in the United States – Action for annulment – Standing to bring proceedings – Admissibility – Principle of good administration – Right to be heard.#Case T-402/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 October 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0606decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 October 2023.#RN v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Civil service – Officials – EUIPO staff – Remuneration – Family allowances – Payment of allowances to a third person in the name and on behalf of the official – Decision no longer to pay certain allowances to a third person in the name and on behalf of the official.#Case T-606/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 October 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0336decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 October 2023.#Sara Gomez Calavia, en qualité d'héritière de José Manuel Sánchez Gómez v Court of Justice of the European Union.#Civil service – Officials – Reports procedure – Staff report – 2019 appraisal procedure – Guide to staff reports – Lower mark – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Appraisal interview – Deadline for delivering the opinion of the Consultative Committee on Staff Reports.#Case T-336/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 October 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0566decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 October 2023.#Sports Group Denmark A/S v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark ENDURANCE – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Legal certainty – Equal treatment.#Case T-566/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 October 2023

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0345decided

Order of the Court of 18 October 2023.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-345/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 October 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0532decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 October 2023.#OAO Minskii Avtomobilnyi Zavod - upravljajusaja kompanija holdinga Belavtomaz v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Belarus – Freezing of funds – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Concept of ‘support for the regime’ – State-owned enterprise – Error of assessment.#Case T-532/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 October 2023

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0585(01)decided

Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 18 October 2023.#Council of the European Union v Nikita Dmitrievich Mazepin.#Appeal – Interim relief – Application to intervene – Restrictive measures taken having regard to the situation in Ukraine – Application submitted by the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy – Interest in the result of the case – Grant of application to intervene.#Case C-585/23 P(R).

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 October 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0566_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 October 2023.#Sports Group Denmark A/S v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark ENDURANCE – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Legal certainty – Equal treatment.#Case T-566/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 October 2023

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0406decided

Order of the Court of 17 October 2023.#Arkadiusz Kaminski v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-406/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 October 2023

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0406_INFdecided

Order of the Court of 17 October 2023.#Arkadiusz Kaminski v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-406/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 October 2023

Decision· DCELEX 32023D2198in force

Council Decision (EU) 2023/2198 of 16 October 2023 on the signing, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the Arab Republic of Egypt pursuant to Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions on all the tariff rate quotas included in the EU Schedule CLXXV as a consequence of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union

European Union · EUR-Lex · 16 October 2023

Decision· DCELEX 32023D2216in force

Council Decision (EU) 2023/2216 of 16 October 2023 on the signing, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the Argentine Republic amending the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the Argentine Republic pursuant to Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions on all the tariff-rate quotas included in the EU Schedule CLXXV as a consequence of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union

European Union · EUR-Lex · 16 October 2023

Decision· DCELEX 32023D2408in force

Council Decision (EU) 2023/2408 of 16 October 2023 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the Trade Specialised Committee on Administrative Cooperation in VAT and Recovery of Taxes and Duties established by the Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part

European Union · EUR-Lex · 16 October 2023

Proposal· PCCELEX 52023PC0586open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment and the Coastal Region of the Mediterranean (the 'Barcelona Convention') as regards the adoption of a Regional Plan on Agriculture Management, a Regional Plan on Aquaculture Management, a Regional Plan on Urban Stormwater Management, in the framework of Article 15 of the Protocol for the Protection of the Mediterranean Sea against Pollution from Land-Based Sources, and as regards the adoption of amendments to Annexes II and III to the Protocol concerning Special Protected Areas and Biological Diversity

European Union · European Commission · 16 October 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0726decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 October 2023.#Criminal proceedings against GR and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Županijski sud u Puli-Pola.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement – Article 54 – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 50 – Principle ne bis in idem – Assessment in the light of the facts contained in the grounds of the judgment – Assessment in the light of the facts examined in the context of a preliminary investigation and omitted from the indictment – Meaning of ‘the same acts’.#Case C-726/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 October 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0296_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 11 October 2023.#Flowbird v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark FLOWBIRD – Earlier EU figurative mark FLOW – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-296/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 October 2023

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0342_INFdecided

Order of the Court of 11 October 2023.#Thomas Henry GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-342/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 October 2023

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0362_INFdecided

Order of the Court of 11 October 2023.#Tinnus Enterprises LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Issue that is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-362/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 October 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0760_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 11 October 2023.#DCM Film Distribution GmbH v European Commission.#Culture – Creative Europe Programme (2014 to 2020) – MEDIA Sub-programme – Call for proposals EACEA/22/2019 – EACEA decision rejecting an application for failing to meet the eligibility criteria – Commission decision dismissing the administrative appeal against the EACEA decision – Concept of ‘European company’ – Grant open only to applicants owned, directly or by majority participation, by nationals of a Member State of the European Union or by nationals of other European countries participating in the sub-programme – Errors of law and of assessment – Equal treatment – Proportionality.#Case T-760/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 October 2023

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0357_INFdecided

Order of the Court of 11 October 2023.#Tinnus Enterprises LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Issue that is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-357/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 October 2023

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0359_INFdecided

Order of the Court of 11 October 2023.#Tinnus Enterprises LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Issue that is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-359/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 October 2023

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0458_INFdecided

Order of the Court of 11 October 2023.#Emmentaler Switzerland v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-458/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 October 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0516_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 October 2023.#Deutsche Glasfaser Wholesale GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark brightblue – Earlier EU word mark BLUE – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the signs – Similarity of the goods and services – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-516/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 October 2023

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0355_INFdecided

Order of the Court of 11 October 2023.#Tinnus Enterprises LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Issue that is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-355/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 October 2023

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0356_INFdecided

Order of the Court of 11 October 2023.#Tinnus Enterprises LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-356/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 October 2023

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0360_INFdecided

Order of the Court of 11 October 2023.#Tinnus Enterprises LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Issue that is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-360/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 October 2023

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0358_INFdecided

Order of the Court of 11 October 2023.#Tinnus Enterprises LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Issue that is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-358/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 October 2023

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0363_INFdecided

Order of the Court of 11 October 2023.#Tinnus Enterprises LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-363/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 October 2023

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0361_INFdecided

Order of the Court of 11 October 2023.#Tinnus Enterprises LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Issue that is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-361/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 October 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0415_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 11 October 2023.#Republic of Cyprus v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark GRILLOUMI – Earlier national certification word marks ΧΑΛΛΟΥΜΙ HALLOUMI – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-415/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 October 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0490_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 11 October 2023.#Dr. Rudolf Liebe Nachfolger GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark ayuna LESS IS BEAUTY – Earlier EU word mark AJONA – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-490/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 October 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0052_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 11 October 2023.#Olive Line International, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark SANTARRITA – Earlier EU figurative mark Santa Rita – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Proof of genuine use of the earlier trade mark – Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-52/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 October 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0542_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 11 October 2023.#Andres Carlos Martin Rodrigo v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark CALIFORNIA Dreaming by Made in California – Earlier Benelux word mark CALIFORNIA DREAM – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-542/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 October 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0087_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 11 October 2023.#Biogena GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark THE GOOD GUMS – Absolute grounds for refusal – No distinctive character – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-87/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 October 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0435_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 11 October 2023.#Pascoe pharmazeutische Präparate GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark PASCELMO – Earlier EU word mark PASCOE – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-435/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 October 2023

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0359decided

Order of the Court of 11 October 2023.#Tinnus Enterprises LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-359/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 October 2023

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0357decided

Order of the Court of 11 October 2023.#Tinnus Enterprises LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-357/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 October 2023

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0361decided

Order of the Court of 11 October 2023.#Tinnus Enterprises LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-361/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 October 2023

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0362decided

Order of the Court of 11 October 2023.#Tinnus Enterprises LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-362/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 October 2023

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0358decided

Order of the Court of 11 October 2023.#Tinnus Enterprises LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-358/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 October 2023

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0356decided

Order of the Court of 11 October 2023.#Tinnus Enterprises LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-356/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 October 2023

PreviousPage 8 of 9Next