Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

51 records in EU in 2019

All countriesEuropean Union · 19,773Ireland · 5,711United Kingdom · 1,357Netherlands · 772Germany · 294France · 175United States · 141Austria · 55Belgium · 1Search this topic

Records

Decision· DCELEX 32019D2245in force

Council Decision (EU) 2019/2245 of 19 December 2019 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the Association Committee in Trade configuration established by the Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Moldova, of the other part, as regards the update of Annex XV (Elimination of customs duties) to the Agreement

European Union · EUR-Lex · 19 December 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0752_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 December 2019.#Deutsche Umwelthilfe eV v Freistaat Bayern.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Article 6, the first paragraph of Article 47 and Article 52(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Directive 2008/50/EC — Atmospheric pollution — Ambient air quality — Air quality plan — Limit values for nitrogen dioxide — Obligation to adopt appropriate measures to ensure that any exceedance period is very short — Obligation on the national courts to take any necessary measure — Refusal of a regional government to comply with an injunction — Coercive detention contemplated in respect of senior political representatives or senior officials of the region concerned — Effective judicial protection — Right to liberty of the person — Legal basis — Proportionality.#Case C-752/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 December 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0460_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 December 2019.#HK v European Commission.#Appeal — Civil service — Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union — Article 1d — First paragraph of Article 17 of Annex VIII — Pension for the surviving spouse — Conditions for granting — Concept of ‘surviving spouse’ of a Union official — Marriage and non-marital partnership — Cohabitation — Principle of non-discrimination — Comparable situation — None — Condition of duration of marriage — Combating fraud — Justification.#Case C-460/18 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 December 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0502_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 December 2019.#Criminal proceedings against Oriol Junqueras Vies.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Expedited procedure — Institutional law — Citizen of the European Union elected to the European Parliament while being held in provisional detention in the context of criminal proceedings — Article 14 TEU — Concept of ‘Member of the European Parliament’ — Article 343 TFEU — Immunities necessary for the performance of the tasks of the European Union — Protocol (No 7) on the privileges and immunities of the European Union — Article 9 — Immunities enjoyed by Members of the European Parliament — Immunity as regards travel — Immunities as regards sessions — Personal, temporal and material scope of the various immunities — Waiver of immunity by the European Parliament — Request to waive immunity from a national court — Act concerning the election of Members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage — Article 5 — Term of office — Article 8 — Electoral procedure — Article 12 — Verification of the credentials of Members of the European Parliament following the official declaration of the election results — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 39(2) — Election of Members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage in a free and secret ballot — Right to stand as a candidate at elections.#Case C-502/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 December 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0501_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 19 December 2019.#Currency One S.A. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark CINKCIARZ – Absolute grounds for refusal – Distinctive character – No descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Pejorative term relating to the goods or services at issue.#Case T-501/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 December 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0690_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 19 December 2019.#Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark Vita — Decision taken following the annulment by the General Court of an earlier decision — Article 65(6) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 72(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Res judicata.#Case T-690/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 December 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0028_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 December 2019.#Karlovarské minerální vody a.s. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark VERITEA — Earlier EU word mark VERI — AGUA PURA DEL PIRINEO — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-28/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 December 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0743_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 December 2019.#Japan Tobacco, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark I.J. TOBACCO INDUSTRY — Earlier EU figurative mark JTi — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-743/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 December 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0729_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 December 2019.#El Corte Inglés, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark LLOYD — Earlier EU figurative mark LLOYD’S — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — No similarity between the goods and services — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-729/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 December 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0040_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 December 2019.#Amigüitos pets & life, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark THE ONLY ONE by alphaspirit wild and perfect — Earlier EU word mark ONE — Relative grounds for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-40/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 December 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0589_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 19 December 2019.#Vins el Cep, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark MIM NATURA — Earlier international word and figurative registrations MM and MM and earlier national word mark MUMM — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-589/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 December 2019

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0696_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 19 December 2019.#Andreas Hauzenberger v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-696/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 December 2019

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0696decided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 19 December 2019.#Andreas Hauzenberger v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-696/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 December 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0729decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 December 2019.#El Corte Inglés, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark LLOYD — Earlier EU figurative mark LLOYD’S — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — No similarity between the goods and services — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-729/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 December 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0743decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 December 2019.#Japan Tobacco, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark I.J. TOBACCO INDUSTRY — Earlier EU figurative mark JTi — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-743/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 December 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0589decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 19 December 2019.#Vins el Cep, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark MIM NATURA — Earlier international word and figurative registrations MM and MM and earlier national word mark MUMM — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-589/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 December 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0028decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 December 2019.#Karlovarské minerální vody a.s. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark VERITEA — Earlier EU word mark VERI — AGUA PURA DEL PIRINEO — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-28/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 December 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0040decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 December 2019.#Amigüitos pets & life, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark THE ONLY ONE by alphaspirit wild and perfect — Earlier EU word mark ONE — Relative grounds for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-40/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 December 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0383decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 19 December 2019.#Sta*Ware EDV Beratung GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU figurative mark businessNavi — Genuine use of the mark — Partial revocation — Article 51(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-383/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 December 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0383_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 19 December 2019.#Sta*Ware EDV Beratung GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU figurative mark businessNavi — Genuine use of the mark — Partial revocation — Article 51(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-383/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 December 2019

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0679_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 19 December 2019.#NL v Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Bucureşti.#Request for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Controls of cash entering or leaving the European Union –Regulation (EC) No 1889/2005 — Scope — Articles 63 and 65 TFEU — Free movement of capital — Transport of large amounts of cash entering or leaving the territory of a Member State — Obligation to declare — Sanctions — Fine and confiscation for the benefit of the State of an undeclared sum in excess of 10 000 euros — Proportionality.#Case C-679/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 December 2019

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0679decided

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 19 December 2019.#NL v Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Bucureşti.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Ilfov.#Request for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Controls of cash entering or leaving the European Union –Regulation (EC) No 1889/2005 — Scope — Articles 63 and 65 TFEU — Free movement of capital — Transport of large amounts of cash entering or leaving the territory of a Member State — Obligation to declare — Sanctions — Fine and confiscation for the benefit of the State of an undeclared sum in excess of 10 000 euros — Proportionality.#Case C-679/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 December 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0714decided

Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston delivered on 19 December 2019.#ACTC GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Application for registration of EU word mark tigha — Opposition filed by the proprietor of the earlier EU trade mark TAIGA — Partial dismissal of the application for registration — Article 8(1)(b) — Assessment of the likelihood of confusion — Assessment of the conceptual similarity of the signs at issue — Article 42(2) — Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark — Proof of use ‘in relation to part … of the goods or services’ — Determination of an independent subcategory of goods.#Case C-714/18 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 December 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0311decided

Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 19 December 2019.#Data Protection Commissioner v Facebook Ireland Limited and Maximillian Schrems.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland).#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Articles 7, 8 and 47 — Regulation (EU) 2016/679 — Article 2(2) — Scope — Transfers of personal data to third countries for commercial purposes — Article 45 — Commission adequacy decision — Article 46 — Transfers subject to appropriate safeguards — Article 58 — Powers of the supervisory authorities — Processing of the data transferred by the public authorities of a third country for national security purposes — Assessment of the adequacy of the level of protection in the third country — Decision 2010/87/EU — Protective standard clauses on the transfer of personal data to third countries — Suitable safeguards provided by the data controller — Validity — Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/1250 — Adequacy of the protection provided by the EU-US Privacy Shield — Validity — Complaint by a natural person whose data was transferred from the European Union to the United States.#Case C-311/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 December 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0502decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 December 2019.#Criminal proceedings against Oriol Junqueras Vies.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Expedited procedure — Institutional law — Citizen of the European Union elected to the European Parliament while being held in provisional detention in the context of criminal proceedings — Article 14 TEU — Concept of ‘Member of the European Parliament’ — Article 343 TFEU — Immunities necessary for the performance of the tasks of the European Union — Protocol (No 7) on the privileges and immunities of the European Union — Article 9 — Immunities enjoyed by Members of the European Parliament — Immunity as regards travel — Immunities as regards sessions — Personal, temporal and material scope of the various immunities — Waiver of immunity by the European Parliament — Request to waive immunity from a national court — Act concerning the election of Members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage — Article 5 — Term of office — Article 8 — Electoral procedure — Article 12 — Verification of the credentials of Members of the European Parliament following the official declaration of the election results — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 39(2) — Election of Members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage in a free and secret ballot — Right to stand as a candidate at elections.#Case C-502/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 December 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0752decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 December 2019.#Deutsche Umwelthilfe eV v Freistaat Bayern.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bayerischer Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Article 6, the first paragraph of Article 47 and Article 52(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Directive 2008/50/EC — Atmospheric pollution — Ambient air quality — Air quality plan — Limit values for nitrogen dioxide — Obligation to adopt appropriate measures to ensure that any exceedance period is very short — Obligation on the national courts to take any necessary measure — Refusal of a regional government to comply with an injunction — Coercive detention contemplated in respect of senior political representatives or senior officials of the region concerned — Effective judicial protection — Right to liberty of the person — Legal basis — Proportionality.#Case C-752/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 December 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0690decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 19 December 2019.#Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark Vita — Decision taken following the annulment by the General Court of an earlier decision — Article 65(6) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 72(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Res judicata.#Case T-690/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 December 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0501decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 19 December 2019.#Currency One S.A. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark CINKCIARZ – Absolute grounds for refusal – Distinctive character – No descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Pejorative term relating to the goods or services at issue.#Case T-501/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 December 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0447_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2019.#UB v Generálny riaditeľ Sociálnej poisťovne Bratislava.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security — Coordination of social security systems — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Article 3 — Matters covered — Old-age benefit — Freedom of movement for workers within the European Union — Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 — Article 7 — Equal treatment of national workers and migrant workers — Social advantages — Legislation of a Member State restricting the grant of an ‘additional benefit for sportspersons who have represented the State’ to the citizens of that State.#Case C-447/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 December 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0624_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2019.#Gres de Aragón, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Application for the EU figurative mark GRES ARAGÓN — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — No descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons — Error of law.#Case T-624/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 December 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0624decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2019.#Gres de Aragón, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Application for the EU figurative mark GRES ARAGÓN — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — No descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons — Error of law.#Case T-624/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 December 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0447decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2019.#UB v Generálny riaditeľ Sociálnej poisťovne Bratislava.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security — Coordination of social security systems — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Article 3 — Matters covered — Old-age benefit — Freedom of movement for workers within the European Union — Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 — Article 7 — Equal treatment of national workers and migrant workers — Social advantages — Legislation of a Member State restricting the grant of an ‘additional benefit for sportspersons who have represented the State’ to the citizens of that State.#Case C-447/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 December 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0719decided

Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 18 December 2019.#Vivendi SA v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Electronic communications – Article 11(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Freedom and pluralism of the media – Freedom of establishment – Article 49 TFEU – Directive 2002/21/EC – Articles 15 and 16 – National legislation prohibiting an undertaking which has significant market power in a sector from establishing a ‘significant economic dimension’ in another sector – Calculation of revenues received in the electronic communications sector and the media sector – Definition of the electronic communications sector – Restriction to markets which have been subject to ex ante regulation – Account taken of the income of affiliated companies – Fixing of different income thresholds for undertakings active in the electronic communications sector.#Case C-719/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 December 2019

Page 1 of 2Next