Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Amendment · HAMDT

HAMDT 423 (101st)

An amendment to require the Treasury Department to establish a pilot program of recordkeeping for international electronic transfers of funds that would require customers to supply to banks the names, addresses, and account numbers of parties involved in the transaction. The Treasury Department would have discretion as to which specific banks and categories of international wire transfers would be involved in the pilot program. After one year, the Department would have to certify to Congress that the recordkeeping program is cost effective, useful to law enforcement, and not detrimental to legitimate commerce, before the program could be implemented on a national basis. The amendment would eliminate the bill's specific requirement that the Department adopt, by the end of 1990, final regulations concerning the recordkeeping of international wire transfers, but would not preclude Treasury from continuing to prepare such regulations.

failedUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

—

Last action

—

Status

On agreeing to the Torres amendment (A003) Failed by recorded vote: 127 - 283 (Roll no. 81).

Sponsors

Rep. Torres, Esteban Edward [D-CA-34]

Subjects

Police

Source updated

1 July 2021

Police

Records

Official amendment HAMDT 423 (101st) from United States at United States Congress. Status: On agreeing to the Torres amendment (A003) Failed by recorded vote: 127 - 283 (Roll no. 81)..

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.