PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · HJRES

H.J.Res. 29 (112th)

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States regarding the right of all citizens of the United States to a public education of equal high quality.

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

14 February 2011

Last action

28 February 2011 · Referred

Status

Referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution.

Sponsors

Rep. Jackson, Jesse L., Jr. [D-IL-2], JOHN CONYERS, Raúl Grijalva, Rep. Brown, Corrine [D-FL-5], Rep. Davis, Danny K. [D-IL-7], WM. CLAY, G. K. Butterfield, Rep. Carson, André [D-IN-7], Emanuel Cleaver, James Clyburn, ELIJAH CUMMINGS, Rep. Fattah, Chaka [D-PA-2], Rep. Filner, Bob [D-CA-51], Rep. Johnson, Henry C. "Hank" [D-GA-4], Marcy Kaptur, Rep. Kucinich, Dennis J. [D-OH-10], JOHN LEWIS, Rep. Payne, Donald M. [D-NJ-10], Rep. Rangel, Charles B. [D-NY-19], BOBBY RUSH, David Scott, Bennie Thompson, Rep. Towns, Edolphus [D-NY-11], Rep. Watt, Melvin L. [D-NC-12], Karen Bass, Marcia Fudge, Sheila Jackson Lee, Barbara Lee, Keith Ellison

Subjects

Rule of law, Education

Source updated

3 January 2025

Rule of law · Education

Summary

Constitutional Amendment - Provides that all persons shall enjoy the right to a public education of equal high quality.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 14 February 2011

    Introduced

    Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 14 February 2011

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 14 February 2011

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  4. 28 February 2011

    Referred

    Referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution.

    Source: Committee

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

3 official files

Introduced in House (text)

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.