Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · HR

H.R. 1544 (105th)

Federal Agency Compliance Act

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

7 May 1997

Last action

26 February 1998 · Introduced

Status

Received in the Senate and read twice and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.

Sponsors

Rep. Gekas, George W. [R-PA-17], Rep. Frank, Barney [D-MA-4], Rep. Cook, Merrill [R-UT-2], Sen. Talent, Jim [R-MO], Rep. Goodlatte, Bob [R-VA-6], Rep. Sessions, Pete [R-TX-17], Rep. Calvert, Ken [R-CA-41], Rep. English, Phil [R-PA-3], Rep. Sensenbrenner, F. James, Jr. [R-WI-5], Rep. Stark, Fortney Pete [D-CA-13], Sen. Wicker, Roger F. [R-MS], Rep. Canady, Charles T. [R-FL-12], Rep. Bonior, David E. [D-MI-10], Sen. Sanders, Bernard [I-VT], Rep. Nadler, Jerrold [D-NY-12], Rep. Bentsen, Ken [D-TX-25]

Subjects

Defence

Source updated

10 August 2026

Defence

Summary

Federal Agency Compliance Act - Requires a Federal agency, in administering a statute, rule, regulation, program, or policy (statute) within a judicial circuit, to adhere to the existing precedent respecting the interpretation and application of such statute, as established by the decisions of the U.S. court of appeals for that circuit, with exceptions. Allows an agency to take a position, either in administration or litigation, that is at variance with such precedent if: (1) it is uncertain whether the administration of the statute will be subject to review by the appeals court that established that precedent or a court of appeals for another circuit; (2) the Government did not seek further review of the case in which that precedent was first established in that appeals court or the U.S. Supreme Court because neither the United States nor any agency or officer thereof was a party to the case or because the decision establishing that precedent was otherwise substantially favorable to the Government; or (3) it is reasonable to question the continued validity of that precedent in light of a subsequent decision of that appeals court or the U.S. Supreme Court, a subsequent change in any pertinent statute or regulation, or any other subsequent change in the public policy or circumstances on which that precedent was based. Requires: (1) the officers of any Federal agency supervising the conduct of litigation to ensure that the initiation, defense, and continuation of proceedings in the U.S. courts within, or subject to the jurisdiction of, a particular judicial circuit avoids unnecessarily repetitive litigation on questions of law already consistently resolved against the U.S. position in precedents established by the U.S. courts of appeals for three or more other judicial circuits; (2) decisions on whether to initiate, defend, or continue litigation for purposes of this Act to take into account specified factors, including the effect of intervening changes in pertinent law or the public policy or circumstances on which the established precedents were based; and (3) the Attorney General to report annually to specified congressional committees on the Federal agency efforts to comply with this Act. Specifies that a decision on whether to initiate, defend, or continue litigation is not subject to court review on the grounds that the decision violates the requirement under this Act regarding adherence to court of appeals precedents.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 7 May 1997

    Introduced

    Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 7 May 1997

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 7 May 1997

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  4. 14 May 1997

    Referred

    Referred to the Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative Law.

    Source: Committee

  5. 22 May 1997

    Committee

    Subcommittee Hearings Held.

    Source: Committee

  6. 24 July 1997

    Committee

    Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.

    Source: Committee

  7. 24 July 1997

    Committee

    Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    Source: Committee

  8. 17 September 1997

    Reported

    Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.

    Source: Committee

  9. 17 September 1997

    Committee

    Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    Source: Committee

  10. 8 November 1997

    Calendars

    Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 230.

    Source: Calendars

  11. 8 November 1997

    Reported

    Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 105-395.

    Source: Committee

  12. 8 November 1997

    Reported

    Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 105-395.

    Source: Committee

  13. 24 February 1998

    Reported

    Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 367 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 1544 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit. Measure will be read by section. Bill is open to amendments. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on the Judiciary now printed in the bill.

    Source: Floor

  14. 25 February 1998

    Passed

    Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    Source: Floor

  15. 25 February 1998

    Vote

    On passage Passed by recorded vote: 241 - 176 (Roll no. 24).

    Source: Floor

  16. 25 February 1998

    Vote

    Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by recorded vote: 241 - 176 (Roll no. 24).

    Source: Floor

  17. 25 February 1998

    Passed

    The House adopted the amendment in the nature of a substitute as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.

    Source: Floor

  18. 25 February 1998

    Floor

    The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.

    Source: Floor

  19. 25 February 1998

    Floor

    The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 1544.

    Source: Floor

  20. 25 February 1998

    Floor

    The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.

    Source: Floor

  21. 25 February 1998

    Floor

    Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 1544 as unfinished business.

    Source: Floor

  22. 25 February 1998

    Floor

    Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 1544 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit. Measure will be read by section. Bill is open to amendments. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment, the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on the Judiciary now printed in the bill.

    Source: Floor

  23. 25 February 1998

    Floor

    The Speaker designated the Honorable Jo Ann Emerson to act as Chairwoman of the Committee.

    Source: Floor

  24. 25 February 1998

    Floor

    House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 367 and Rule XXIII.

    Source: Floor

  25. 25 February 1998

    Floor

    Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 367. (consideration: CR H587-598; H609-611)

    Source: Floor

  26. 25 February 1998

    Passed

    Rule H. Res. 367 passed House.

    Source: Floor

  27. 26 February 1998

    Introduced

    Received in the Senate and read twice and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.

    Source: IntroReferral

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

11 official files

Referred in Senate (text)

View fileDownload file

This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Referred in Senate (text)

    Referred in Senate · EN · 26 February 1998

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Referred in Senate (PDF)

    Referred in Senate · EN · 26 February 1998

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Engrossed in House (text)

    Engrossed in House · EN · 25 February 1998

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Engrossed in House (PDF)

    Engrossed in House · EN · 25 February 1998

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Passed House amended

    summary · EN · 25 February 1998

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Reported in House (text)

    Reported in House · EN · 8 November 1997

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Reported in House (PDF)

    Reported in House · EN · 8 November 1997

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Reported to House with amendment(s)

    summary · EN · 8 November 1997

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House (text)

    Introduced in House · EN · 7 May 1997

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House (PDF)

    Introduced in House · EN · 7 May 1997

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House

    summary · EN · 7 May 1997

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.