United States · Bill · HR
H.R. 1544 (105th)
Federal Agency Compliance Act
Introduced
7 May 1997
Last action
26 February 1998 · Introduced
Status
Received in the Senate and read twice and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.
Sponsors
Rep. Gekas, George W. [R-PA-17], Rep. Frank, Barney [D-MA-4], Rep. Cook, Merrill [R-UT-2], Sen. Talent, Jim [R-MO], Rep. Goodlatte, Bob [R-VA-6], Rep. Sessions, Pete [R-TX-17], Rep. Calvert, Ken [R-CA-41], Rep. English, Phil [R-PA-3], Rep. Sensenbrenner, F. James, Jr. [R-WI-5], Rep. Stark, Fortney Pete [D-CA-13], Sen. Wicker, Roger F. [R-MS], Rep. Canady, Charles T. [R-FL-12], Rep. Bonior, David E. [D-MI-10], Sen. Sanders, Bernard [I-VT], Rep. Nadler, Jerrold [D-NY-12], Rep. Bentsen, Ken [D-TX-25]
Subjects
Defence
Source updated
10 August 2026
Summary
Federal Agency Compliance Act - Requires a Federal agency, in administering a statute, rule, regulation, program, or policy (statute) within a judicial circuit, to adhere to the existing precedent respecting the interpretation and application of such statute, as established by the decisions of the U.S. court of appeals for that circuit, with exceptions. Allows an agency to take a position, either in administration or litigation, that is at variance with such precedent if: (1) it is uncertain whether the administration of the statute will be subject to review by the appeals court that established that precedent or a court of appeals for another circuit; (2) the Government did not seek further review of the case in which that precedent was first established in that appeals court or the U.S. Supreme Court because neither the United States nor any agency or officer thereof was a party to the case or because the decision establishing that precedent was otherwise substantially favorable to the Government; or (3) it is reasonable to question the continued validity of that precedent in light of a subsequent decision of that appeals court or the U.S. Supreme Court, a subsequent change in any pertinent statute or regulation, or any other subsequent change in the public policy or circumstances on which that precedent was based. Requires: (1) the officers of any Federal agency supervising the conduct of litigation to ensure that the initiation, defense, and continuation of proceedings in the U.S. courts within, or subject to the jurisdiction of, a particular judicial circuit avoids unnecessarily repetitive litigation on questions of law already consistently resolved against the U.S. position in precedents established by the U.S. courts of appeals for three or more other judicial circuits; (2) decisions on whether to initiate, defend, or continue litigation for purposes of this Act to take into account specified factors, including the effect of intervening changes in pertinent law or the public policy or circumstances on which the established precedents were based; and (3) the Attorney General to report annually to specified congressional committees on the Federal agency efforts to comply with this Act. Specifies that a decision on whether to initiate, defend, or continue litigation is not subject to court review on the grounds that the decision violates the requirement under this Act regarding adherence to court of appeals precedents.
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
7 May 1997
Introduced
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Source: IntroReferral
7 May 1997
Introduced
Introduced in House
Source: IntroReferral
7 May 1997
Introduced
Introduced in House
Source: IntroReferral
14 May 1997
Referred
Referred to the Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative Law.
Source: Committee
22 May 1997
Committee
Subcommittee Hearings Held.
Source: Committee
24 July 1997
Committee
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.
Source: Committee
24 July 1997
Committee
Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Source: Committee
17 September 1997
Reported
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.
Source: Committee
17 September 1997
Committee
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Source: Committee
8 November 1997
Calendars
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 230.
Source: Calendars
8 November 1997
Reported
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 105-395.
Source: Committee
8 November 1997
Reported
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 105-395.
Source: Committee
24 February 1998
Reported
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 367 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 1544 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit. Measure will be read by section. Bill is open to amendments. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on the Judiciary now printed in the bill.
Source: Floor
25 February 1998
Passed
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Source: Floor
25 February 1998
Vote
On passage Passed by recorded vote: 241 - 176 (Roll no. 24).
Source: Floor
25 February 1998
Vote
Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by recorded vote: 241 - 176 (Roll no. 24).
Source: Floor
25 February 1998
Passed
The House adopted the amendment in the nature of a substitute as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.
Source: Floor
25 February 1998
Floor
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
Source: Floor
25 February 1998
Floor
The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 1544.
Source: Floor
25 February 1998
Floor
The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.
Source: Floor
25 February 1998
Floor
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 1544 as unfinished business.
Source: Floor
25 February 1998
Floor
Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 1544 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit. Measure will be read by section. Bill is open to amendments. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment, the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on the Judiciary now printed in the bill.
Source: Floor
25 February 1998
Floor
The Speaker designated the Honorable Jo Ann Emerson to act as Chairwoman of the Committee.
Source: Floor
25 February 1998
Floor
House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 367 and Rule XXIII.
Source: Floor
25 February 1998
Floor
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 367. (consideration: CR H587-598; H609-611)
Source: Floor
25 February 1998
Passed
Rule H. Res. 367 passed House.
Source: Floor
26 February 1998
Introduced
Received in the Senate and read twice and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.
Source: IntroReferral
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
- Referred in Senate · 26 February 1998 · Download file
- Engrossed in House · 25 February 1998 · Download file
- Reported in House · 8 November 1997 · Download file
- Introduced in House · 7 May 1997 · Download file
Documents
11 official files
Referred in Senate (text)
This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.
Leesvertaling
Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.
Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.
Referred in Senate (text)
Referred in Senate · EN · 26 February 1998
Referred in Senate (PDF)
Referred in Senate · EN · 26 February 1998
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Leesvertaling
Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.
Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.
Engrossed in House (text)
Engrossed in House · EN · 25 February 1998
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Leesvertaling
Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.
Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.
Engrossed in House (PDF)
Engrossed in House · EN · 25 February 1998
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Leesvertaling
Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.
Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.
Passed House amended
summary · EN · 25 February 1998
Leesvertaling
Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.
Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.
Reported in House (text)
Reported in House · EN · 8 November 1997
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Leesvertaling
Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.
Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.
Reported in House (PDF)
Reported in House · EN · 8 November 1997
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Leesvertaling
Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.
Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.
Reported to House with amendment(s)
summary · EN · 8 November 1997
Leesvertaling
Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.
Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.
Introduced in House (text)
Introduced in House · EN · 7 May 1997
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Leesvertaling
Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.
Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.
Introduced in House (PDF)
Introduced in House · EN · 7 May 1997
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Leesvertaling
Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.
Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.
Introduced in House
summary · EN · 7 May 1997
Leesvertaling
Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.
Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.
Sponsors
- Rep. Gekas, George W. [R-PA-17] · R · Sponsor
- Rep. Frank, Barney [D-MA-4] · D · Sponsor
- Rep. Cook, Merrill [R-UT-2] · R · Cosponsor
- Sen. Talent, Jim [R-MO] · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. Goodlatte, Bob [R-VA-6] · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. Sessions, Pete [R-TX-17] · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. Calvert, Ken [R-CA-41] · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. English, Phil [R-PA-3] · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. Sensenbrenner, F. James, Jr. [R-WI-5] · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. Stark, Fortney Pete [D-CA-13] · D · Cosponsor
- Sen. Wicker, Roger F. [R-MS] · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. Canady, Charles T. [R-FL-12] · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. Bonior, David E. [D-MI-10] · D · Cosponsor
- Sen. Sanders, Bernard [I-VT] · I · Cosponsor
- Rep. Nadler, Jerrold [D-NY-12] · D · Cosponsor
- Rep. Bentsen, Ken [D-TX-25] · D · Cosponsor
- · ssju00 · Standing
- · hsju00 · Standing
Related records
- related to → Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1544) to prevent Federal agencies from pursuing policies of unjustifiable nonacquiescence in, and relitigation of, precedents established in the Federal judicial circuits.
- amends ← HAMDT 493
- amends ← An amendment to add a new section which specifies that the applications provided for in the bill will not affect an agency in its actions involving a commercial transaction with a business located in a foreign country.
- amends ← An amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on the Judiciary and now printed in the bill.
- amends ← An amendment to exempt from the provisions of the bill any agency matter that is under consideration by a U.S. court of appeals and involves civil ritghts.
- amends ← An amendment to narrow the scope of the bill to those areas involving Federal health benefit programs, Federal programs under which cash is paid based on need or insurance benefits, or the Internal Revenue Code.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.congress.gov/bill/105th-congress/house-bill/1544
- Open data entity: https://api.congress.gov/v3/bill/105/hr/1544
- us · 105-hr-1544 · source updated 10 August 2026