PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · HR

H.R. 2477 (110th)

State Child Well-Being Research Act of 2007

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

24 May 2007

Last action

5 June 2007 · Referred

Status

Referred to the Subcommittee on Income Security and Family Support.

Sponsors

Rep. Fattah, Chaka [D-PA-2], Rep. Camp, Dave [R-MI-4], Rep. Platts, Todd Russell [R-PA-19], Rosa DeLauro, Rep. Cardoza, Dennis A. [D-CA-18], Del. Christensen, Donna M. [D-VI-At Large], Rep. Kilpatrick, Carolyn C. [D-MI-13], Rep. Davis, Danny K. [D-IL-7], ROBERT BRADY, Earl Blumenauer, BOBBY RUSH, Rep. Stark, Fortney Pete [D-CA-9], TIM RYAN, C. Ruppersberger, Rep. Schwartz, Allyson Y. [D-PA-13], Rep. Carnahan, Russ [D-MO-3], ELIJAH CUMMINGS, John Sarbanes, Rescom. Fortuno, Luis G. [R-PR-At Large]

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

5 December 2025

Summary

State Child Well-Being Research Act of 2007 - Amends part A (Temporary Assistance for Needy Families) (TANF) of title IV of the Social Security Act to require the Secretary of Health and Human Services to develop comprehensive indicators to assess child well-being in each state. Directs the Secretary to establish an advisory panel to make recommendations regarding the appropriate measures and statistical tools necessary for making such assessment.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 24 May 2007

    Introduced

    Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 24 May 2007

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 24 May 2007

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  4. 5 June 2007

    Referred

    Referred to the Subcommittee on Income Security and Family Support.

    Source: Committee

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

3 official files

Introduced in House (text)

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

Related records

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.