Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · HR

H.R. 3523 (101st)

Comprehensive Urban Transportation Act of 1989

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

25 October 1989

Last action

6 November 1989 · Committee

Status

Referred to the Subcommittee on Surface Transportation.

Sponsors

Rep. Lipinski, William O. [D-IL-3], Rep. Hastert, J. Dennis [R-IL-14], Rep. Costello, Jerry F. [D-IL-12], Rep. Savage, Gus [D-IL-2], Rep. Roe, Robert A. [D-NJ-8], Del. de Lugo, Ron [D-VI-At Large], Rep. Hayes, Charles A. [D-IL-1], Rep. Martin, Lynn M. [R-IL-16], Rep. Madigan, Edward R. [R-IL-15], Rep. Evans, Lane [D-IL-17], Rep. Collins, Cardiss [D-IL-7], Del. Faleomavaega, Eni F. H. [D-AS-At Large], Rep. Annunzio, Frank [D-IL-11], Rep. Sangmeister, George E. [D-IL-4], Rep. Hyde, Henry J. [R-IL-6], Rep. Dwyer, Bernard J. [D-NJ-6], Rep. Towns, Edolphus [D-NY-10]

Subjects

Transport

Source updated

26 August 2025

Transport

Summary

Comprehensive Urban Transportation Act of 1989 - Establishes a strategic urbanized program for providing assistance for the Federal-aid highway systems in urbanized areas with populations of 50,000 or more for projects designed to help reduce traffic congestion and traffic flow problems. Directs the Secretary of Transportation to: (1) apportion funds authorized for expenditure under the program according to specified guidelines based on population; and (2) require that projects be selected by the State highway department of each State. Allows up to 25 percent of the amount apportioned in a fiscal year to a State under the program to be transferred for other specified uses if requested by the State highway department and approved by the Governor of such State and the Secretary as being in the public interest. Directs the Secretary to set aside $300,000,000 for discretionary projects. Sets forth criteria which must be met before a State may obtain funding. Specifies factors which the Secretary shall consider in selecting projects, including: (1) project cost; (2) traffic congestion levels; (3) importance of a project to a congestion relief planning effort; and (4) impact of a project on economic development. Specifies that the Federal share shall not exceed 50 percent of the cost of any project. Authorizes appropriations. Authorizes the use of such funds for public transportation, railway-highway crossings, carpool and vanpool projects, bicycle transportation and pedestrian walkways, and research and planning.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 25 October 1989

    Introduced

    Referred to the House Committee on Public Works + Transportation.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 25 October 1989

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 25 October 1989

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  4. 6 November 1989

    Referred

    Referred to the Subcommittee on Surface Transportation.

    Source: Committee

  5. 6 November 1989

    Committee

    Executive Comment Requested from DOT and OMB.

    Source: Committee

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

2 official files

Introduced in House (text)

View fileDownload file

This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House (text)

    Introduced in House · EN

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Introduced in House

    summary · EN · 25 October 1989

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.