Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · HR

H.R. 3862 (112th)

Sunshine for Regulatory Decrees and Settlements Act of 2012

openUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

1 February 2012

Last action

11 July 2012 · Reported

Status

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 428.

Sponsors

Rep. Quayle, Benjamin [R-AZ-3], Rep. Coble, Howard [R-NC-6], Rep. Ross, Dennis A. [R-FL-15], Rep. Gallegly, Elton [R-CA-24], Rep. Huizenga, Bill [R-MI-4], Rep. Kingston, Jack [R-GA-1], Rep. McHenry, Patrick T. [R-NC-10], Rep. Rokita, Todd [R-IN-4], Sen. Blackburn, Marsha [R-TN], Rep. Flores, Bill [R-TX-17], Rep. Harris, Andy [R-MD-1], Rep. Yoder, Kevin [R-KS-3], Rep. Peterson, Collin C. [D-MN-7], Rep. Schweikert, David [R-AZ-1], Rep. Scalise, Steve [R-LA-1], Rep. Miller, Jeff [R-FL-1], Rep. Pitts, Joseph R. [R-PA-16], Rep. Black, Diane [R-TN-6]

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

7 April 2025

Summary

Sunshine for Regulatory Decrees and Settlements Act of 2012 - Imposes new requirements upon consent decrees or settlement agreements in any action to compel a federal agency to take regulatory action that is alleged to be unlawfully withheld or unreasonably delayed that affects the rights of private parties other than the plaintiff or the rights of state or local governments. Requires in any such action: (1) publication of the complaint in a readily accessible manner, (2) an opportunity for affected parties to intervene in an action prior to the entry of a consent decree or settlement agreement, (3) referral to a mediation program or a magistrate judge to facilitate settlement discussions after a motion to intervene is granted, (4) opportunity for public comment on a proposed consent decree or settlement agreement before it is filed with a court and public hearings on whether to enter into the consent decree or settlement agreement, and (5) approval by the Attorney General of any proposed consent decree or settlement agreement in cases litigated by the Department of Justice (DOJ). Allows an agency to file a motion for de novo review of a consent decree in court if such motion alleges that the terms of the decree are no longer fully in the public interest due to the agency's obligations to fulfill other duties or due to changed facts and circumstances.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 1 February 2012

    Introduced

    Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 1 February 2012

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 1 February 2012

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  4. 2 February 2012

    Referred

    Referred to the Subcommittee on Courts, Commercial and Administrative Law.

    Source: Committee

  5. 3 February 2012

    Committee

    Subcommittee Hearings Held.

    Source: Committee

  6. 15 March 2012

    Committee

    Subcommittee on Courts, Commercial and Administrative Law Discharged.

    Source: Committee

  7. 20 March 2012

    Committee

    Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    Source: Committee

  8. 27 March 2012

    Vote

    Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 20 - 10.

    Source: Committee

  9. 27 March 2012

    Committee

    Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    Source: Committee

  10. 11 July 2012

    Calendars

    Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 428.

    Source: Calendars

  11. 11 July 2012

    Reported

    Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 112-593.

    Source: Committee

  12. 11 July 2012

    Reported

    Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 112-593.

    Source: Committee

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

6 official files

Reported in House (text)

View fileDownload file

This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Reported in House (text)

    Reported in House · EN · 11 July 2012

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Reported in House (PDF)

    Reported in House · EN · 11 July 2012

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Reported to House with amendment(s)

    summary · EN · 11 July 2012

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House (text)

    Introduced in House · EN · 1 February 2012

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House (PDF)

    Introduced in House · EN · 1 February 2012

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House

    summary · EN · 1 February 2012

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.