Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · HR

H.R. 469 (115th)

Congressional Article I Powers Strengthening Act

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

12 January 2017

Last action

26 October 2017 · Introduced

Status

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

Sponsors

Rep. Collins, Doug [R-GA-9], Rep. Goodlatte, Bob [R-VA-6], Rep. Carter, Earl L. "Buddy" [R-GA-1], Rep. Crawford, Eric A. "Rick" [R-AR-1], Rep. Tipton, Scott R. [R-CO-3], Rep. Gosar, Paul A. [R-AZ-9], Rep. Marino, Tom [R-PA-10], Rep. Smith, Lamar [R-TX-21], Rep. Latta, Robert E. [R-OH-5], Rep. Pearce, Stevan [R-NM-2], Rep. Farenthold, Blake [R-TX-27], Rep. Babin, Brian [R-TX-36], Rep. Barr, Andy [R-KY-6], Rep. Yoho, Ted S. [R-FL-3], Rep. Chabot, Steve [R-OH-1], Rep. Gohmert, Louie [R-TX-1], Sen. Cramer, Kevin [R-ND], Rep. Coffman, Mike [R-CO-6], Rep. Smith, Jason [R-MO-8], Rep. King, Steve [R-IA-4], Sen. Budd, Ted [R-NC], Rep. Palmer, Gary J. [R-AL-6]

Subjects

Rule of law, Budget

Source updated

10 August 2026

Rule of law · Budget

Summary

Sunshine for Regulations and Regulatory Decrees and Settlements Act of 2017 This bill establishes public notice and comment procedures and motion to intervene standards for civil actions seeking to compel agency action and alleging that an agency is unlawfully withholding or unreasonably delaying an agency action, and for consent decrees or settlement agreements that require agency action, relating to a regulatory action that would affect the rights of: (1) private persons other than the person bringing the action; or (2) a state, local, or tribal government. The bill sets forth requirements for: agencies against which such an action is brought to publish online, within 15 days after receipt, the notice of intent to sue and the complaint; courts to consider motions to intervene and allow amicus participation; and any settlement proceedings to include intervening parties and to be conducted pursuant to the mediation or alternative dispute resolution program of the court or by a district judge. Agencies seeking to enter such a consent decree or settlement agreement must: publish, and accept and respond to public comment on, the proposed agreement or decree for 60 days before filing it with the court; and make available to the court the administrative record and a summary of public comments and any public hearings. The Department of Justice, or an agency litigating a matter independently, must certify to the court its approval of such proposed: (1) consent decrees that include terms that convert into a nondiscretionary duty a discretionary authority of an agency to propose, promulgate, revise, or amend regulations, commit an agency to expend funds that have not been appropriated and budgeted or to seek a particular appropriation or budget authorization, divest an agency of discretion committed to it by statute or the Constitution, or otherwise afford any relief that the court could not enter under its own authority; or (2) settlement agreements that include terms that provide a remedy for a failure by the agency to comply with the terms of the agreement other than the revival of the civil action resolved by the agreement, interfere with the authority of an agency to revise, amend, or issue rules, or commit the agency to expend funds that have not been appropriated and budgeted or to exercise in a particular way discretion which was committed to the agency by statute or the Constitution. Courts: (1) shall not approve such consent decrees or settlement agreements unless they allow sufficient time and procedures to comply with the Administrative Procedure Act, rulemaking statutes, and executive orders; and (2) shall grant de novo review if an agency files a motion to modify such a decree or agreement on the basis that its terms are no longer fully in the public interest due to changed facts and circumstances or the agency's obligations to fulfill other duties.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 12 January 2017

    Introduced

    Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 12 January 2017

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 12 January 2017

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  4. 6 February 2017

    Referred

    Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law.

    Source: Committee

  5. 12 July 2017

    Vote

    Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 15 - 8.

    Source: Committee

  6. 12 July 2017

    Committee

    Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    Source: Committee

  7. 16 October 2017

    Calendars

    Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 251.

    Source: Calendars

  8. 16 October 2017

    Reported

    Reported by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 115-347.

    Source: Committee

  9. 16 October 2017

    Reported

    Reported by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 115-347.

    Source: Committee

  10. 23 October 2017

    Reported

    Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 577 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 469 and H.R. 732. Measure will be considered read. Specified amendments are in order. Rule provides for one hour of general debate for H.R. 469. The rule also provides for consideration of amendments printed in part A of the report. The rule provides for one hour of general debate for H.R. 732. The rule provides for consideration of amendments printe in part B of the report.

    Source: Floor

  11. 24 October 2017

    Passed

    ORDER OF PROCEDURE - Mr. Collins(GA) asked unanimous consent that during consideration of H.R. 469, pursuant to H.Res. 577, the amendment at the desk be in order in lieu of the amendment printed in part A of House Report 115-363 and numbered 2. Agreed to without objection (consideration: CR H8097; text: CR H8097)

    Source: Floor

  12. 25 October 2017

    Floor

    House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 577 and Rule XVIII.

    Source: Floor

  13. 25 October 2017

    Passed

    Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    Source: Floor

  14. 25 October 2017

    Floor

    Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 577. (consideration: CR H8194-8209)

    Source: Floor

  15. 25 October 2017

    Vote

    On passage Passed by recorded vote: 234 - 187 (Roll no. 588). (text: CR H8199-8201)

    Source: Floor

  16. 25 October 2017

    Vote

    Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by recorded vote: 234 - 187 (Roll no. 588).(text: CR H8199-8201)

    Source: Floor

  17. 25 October 2017

    Passed

    The House adopted the amendment in the nature of a substitute as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.

    Source: Floor

  18. 25 October 2017

    Floor

    The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.

    Source: Floor

  19. 25 October 2017

    Floor

    The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 469.

    Source: Floor

  20. 25 October 2017

    Floor

    The Speaker designated the Honorable John J. Duncan, Jr. to act as Chairman of the Committee.

    Source: Floor

  21. 25 October 2017

    Floor

    Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 469 and H.R. 732. Measure will be considered read. Specified amendments are in order. Rule provides for one hour of general debate for H.R. 469. The rule also provides for consideration of amendments printed in part A of the report. The rule provides for one hour of general debate for H.R. 732. The rule provides for consideration of amendments printe in part B of the report.

    Source: Floor

  22. 26 October 2017

    Introduced

    Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

    Source: IntroReferral

Votes

25 October 2017 · passed · On Passage · Passed · Official source

Yes 234 · No 187 · Abstain — · Absent/not voting 11

Showing the first 4 recorded positions. Vote totals above are complete.

Versions

Documents

9 official files

Referred in Senate (text)

View fileDownload file

This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Referred in Senate (text)

    Referred in Senate · EN · 26 October 2017

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Referred in Senate (PDF)

    Referred in Senate · EN · 26 October 2017

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Engrossed in House (text)

    Engrossed in House · EN · 25 October 2017

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Engrossed in House (PDF)

    Engrossed in House · EN · 25 October 2017

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Reported in House (text)

    Reported in House · EN · 16 October 2017

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Reported in House (PDF)

    Reported in House · EN · 16 October 2017

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House (text)

    Introduced in House · EN · 12 January 2017

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House (PDF)

    Introduced in House · EN · 12 January 2017

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House

    summary · EN · 12 January 2017

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

Showing 9 of 10 related records.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.