Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · HR

H.R. 5342 (106th)

Fairness for National Guard Technicians Act

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

28 September 2000

Last action

28 September 2000 · Introduced

Status

Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.

Sponsors

Rep. Peterson, Collin C. [D-MN-7], Rep. Oberstar, James L. [D-MN-8], Rep. LaHood, Ray [R-IL-18], Rep. Petri, Thomas E. [R-WI-6], Rep. McGovern, James P. [D-MA-2], Rep. Green, Mark [R-WI-8], Rep. Walsh, James T. [R-NY-25], Rep. Kaptur, Marcy [D-OH-9], Sen. Baldwin, Tammy [D-WI], Rep. Schaffer, Bob [R-CO-4], Rep. Dicks, Norman D. [D-WA-6], Rep. Frost, Martin [D-TX-24], Rep. Evans, Lane [D-IL-17], Rep. Cramer, Robert E. (Bud), Jr. [D-AL-5], Rep. Hinchey, Maurice D. [D-NY-22], Rep. McDermott, Jim [D-WA-7], Rep. McKinney, Cynthia A. [D-GA-4], Rep. Brown, Corrine [D-FL-5], Rep. McCollum, Bill [R-FL-8], Rep. Olver, John W. [D-MA-1], Rep. Hutchinson, Asa [R-AR-3], Rep. Filner, Bob [D-CA-51], Rep. Bonior, David E. [D-MI-10], Rep. Kelly, Sue W. [R-NY-19], Rep. Kucinich, Dennis J. [D-OH-10], Rep. Stenholm, Charles W. [D-TX-17], Rep. Doyle, Michael F. [D-PA-14], Rep. Phelps, David D. [D-IL-19], Rep. Kennedy, Patrick J. [D-RI-1], Rep. Minge, David [D-MN-2], Rep. Kind, Ron [D-WI-3], Del. Christensen, Donna M. [D-VI-At Large]

Subjects

Defence

Source updated

20 August 2025

Defence

Official sourceDownload fileView documentsShare

Summary

Fairness for National Guard Technicians Act - Requires National Guard military technicians (dual status) who are eligible, at the time dual status is lost, to an unreduced retirement annuity and are age 60 or older to be separated no later than 30 days after such status is lost. Requires such technicians who are not eligible to an unreduced annuity or who are not under age 60 at such time to be offered the opportunity to either reapply for a dual status position or apply for a civil service position that is not a technician position. States that a technician shall be considered to lose dual status upon: (1) being separated from the Selected Reserve; or (2) ceasing to hold the military grade specified for the technician position held.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 28 September 2000

    Introduced

    Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 28 September 2000

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 28 September 2000

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

3 official files

Introduced in House (text)

View fileDownload file

This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House (text)

    Introduced in House · EN · 28 September 2000

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Introduced in House (PDF)

    Introduced in House · EN · 28 September 2000

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House

    summary · EN · 28 September 2000

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.