Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · HR

H.R. 682 (109th)

Regulatory Flexibility Improvements Act

openUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

9 February 2005

Last action

20 July 2006 · Committee

Status

Subcommittee Hearings Held.

Sponsors

Rep. Manzullo, Donald A. [R-IL-16], Rep. Chabot, Steve [R-OH-1], Rep. King, Steve [R-IA-4], Rep. Westmoreland, Lynn A. [R-GA-3], Rep. Pence, Mike [R-IN-6], Rep. Akin, W. Todd [R-MO-2], Rep. Keller, Ric [R-FL-8], Rep. Cannon, Chris [R-UT-3], Rep. Kelly, Sue W. [R-NY-19], Rep. Mack, Connie [R-FL-14], Sen. Blackburn, Marsha [R-TN], Rep. Poe, Ted [R-TX-2], Rep. Green, Mark [R-WI-8], Rep. Gohmert, Louie [R-TX-1], Rep. Case, Ed [D-HI-1], Rep. Franks, Trent [R-AZ-8], Rep. Bradley, Jeb [R-NH-1], Rep. Sodrel, Michael E. [R-IN-9], Rep. Musgrave, Marilyn N. [R-CO-4]

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

15 August 2025

Summary

Regulatory Flexibility Improvements Act - Revises the Regulatory Flexibility Act. Defines the "economic impact" of a rule to include any economic effects on small entities. Includes tribal organizations within the definition of "small governmental jurisdictions." Redefines a "small organization." Requires initial and final regulatory flexibility analyses: (1) to describe alternatives or steps taken, respectively, that maximize any significant beneficial economic impact on small entities; and (2) for revisions to land management plans, rules made on the record after opportunity for an agency hearing, and interpretive rules involving the internal revenue laws that impose a recordkeeping requirement. Requires initial analyses of a proposed rule to contain a detailed statement (1) of the reasons why a description of duplicative, overlapping, or conflicting Federal rules could not be provided; and (2) estimating the cumulative economic impact on small entities beyond that already imposed on the class of small entities by the agency or explaining why such an estimate is not available. Requires that final analyses include the agency's response to any comments filed on a rule by the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration and a detailed statement of any changes made as a result. Requires publication of analyses on agency websites. Repeals provisions setting forth procedures for waiving or delaying completion of requirements for analyses. Sets forth requirements for a report by the Chief Counsel, after a review panel is convened, assessing the impact of certain proposed rules on small entities and discussing the impact of alternatives. Requires publication by each agency of a new plan for the periodic review of its rules that have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities to determine whether such rules should be continued, changed, or rescinded. Requires the Chief Counsel to issue rules governing agency compliance with the Act and authorizes the Chief Counsel to intervene in agency adjudications and inform the agency of the impact of its decision on small entities.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 9 February 2005

    Introduced

    Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Small Business, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 9 February 2005

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 9 February 2005

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  4. 9 February 2005

    Introduced

    Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Small Business, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

    Source: IntroReferral

  5. 2 March 2005

    Referred

    Referred to the Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative Law.

    Source: Committee

  6. 16 March 2005

    Committee

    Committee Hearings Held.

    Source: Committee

  7. 20 July 2006

    Committee

    Subcommittee Hearings Held.

    Source: Committee

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

3 official files

Introduced in House (text)

View fileDownload file

This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House (text)

    Introduced in House · EN · 9 February 2005

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Introduced in House (PDF)

    Introduced in House · EN · 9 February 2005

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House

    summary · EN · 9 February 2005

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.