PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · HR

H.R. 8 (107th)

Death Tax Elimination Act of 2001

openUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

14 March 2001

Last action

12 June 2002 · Floor

Status

Returned to the Calendar. {pursuant to the order of April 23, 2002}.

Sponsors

Rep. Dunn, Jennifer [R-WA-8], Rep. Tanner, John S. [D-TN-8], Rep. Cox, Christopher [R-CA-40], Rep. Abercrombie, Neil [D-HI-1], Rep. Brown, Henry E., Jr. [R-SC-1], JOHN CULBERSON, Rep. Everett, Terry [R-AL-2], Rep. Goode, Virgil H., Jr. [R-VA-5], Rep. Cooksey, John [R-LA-5], Rep. Bachus, Spencer [R-AL-6], Rep. Pence, Mike [R-IN-6], Rep. LaHood, Ray [R-IL-18], Rep. Shadegg, John B. [R-AZ-3], JOHN DUNCAN, Rep. Whitfield, Ed [R-KY-1], Rep. Saxton, Jim [R-NJ-13], Rep. Bonilla, Henry [R-TX-23], Rep. Roukema, Marge [R-NJ-5], Rep. Biggert, Judy [R-IL-13], Rep. Ferguson, Mike [R-NJ-7], Rep. Gilchrest, Wayne T. [R-MD-1], Rep. Radanovich, George [R-CA-19], Rep. Shaw, E. Clay, Jr. [R-FL-15], Rep. Maloney, James H. [D-CT-5], SAM JOHNSON, Rep. Tancredo, Thomas G. [R-CO-6], Rep. Boucher, Rick [D-VA-9], Rep. Traficant, James A., Jr. [D-OH-17], Rep. Keller, Ric [R-FL-8], Rep. Burton, Dan [R-IN-6], Rep. Shows, Ronnie [D-MS-4], Rep. Miller, Gary G. [R-CA-31], Rep. Rogers, Mike J. [R-MI-8], Rep. Cunningham, Randy (Duke) [R-CA-50], ED ROYCE, Rep. Greenwood, James C. [R-PA-8], LAMAR SMITH, Rep. Foley, Mark [R-FL-16], Rep. Hayworth, J. D. [R-AZ-5], Rep. Weller, Jerry [R-IL-11], Sen. Kirk, Mark Steven [R-IL], DON YOUNG, Rep. Baird, Brian [D-WA-3], Rep. Wamp, Zach [R-TN-3], Rep. Dooley, Calvin M. [D-CA-20], Rep. Ehlers, Vernon J. [R-MI-3], Rep. Cantor, Eric [R-VA-7], Rep. Pombo, Richard W. [R-CA-11]

Subjects

Taxation

Source updated

7 April 2025

Taxation

Summary

Death Tax Elimination Act - Repeals the estate tax, gift tax, and the tax on generation-skipping transfers, effective January 1, 2011. Provides for annual reductions of the tax until such date. Increases the unified estate and gift tax credit to $1.3 million. Repeals the estate and gift tax provisions applicable to family-owned businesses. Amends provisions concerning the special rules for allocation of the generation-skipping tax (GST) exemption to provide, as a general rule, that: (1) if any individual makes an indirect skip during such individual's lifetime, any unused portion of such individual's GST exemption shall be allocated to the property transferred to the extent necessary to make the inclusion ratio for such property zero; and (2) if the amount of the indirect skip exceeds such unused portion, the entire unused portion shall be allocated to the property transferred. Declares that, if a trust is severed in a qualified severance, the trusts resulting from such severance shall be treated as separate trusts thereafter. Revises valuation rules for gifts for which a gift tax return was filed or deemed allocation made. Provides that, if an allocation of the GST exemption to any transfers of property is deemed to have been made at the close of an estate tax inclusion period, the value of the property shall be its value at such time. Directs the Secretary of the Treasury to prescribe circumstances and procedures under which extensions of time will be granted to make an allocation of GST exemption or an election not to apply specified allocation requirements to certain lifetime direct skips, indirect skips, or transfers to a particular trust. Increases the permissible number of partners or shareholders in a closely held business for purposes of eligibility for an extension of estate tax payments.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 14 March 2001

    Introduced

    Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 14 March 2001

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 14 March 2001

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  4. 14 March 2001

    Committee

    Committee Hearings Held Prior to Introduction (Feb 13, 2001).

    Source: Committee

  5. 29 March 2001

    Vote

    Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 24 - 14.

    Source: Committee

  6. 29 March 2001

    Committee

    Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    Source: Committee

  7. 3 April 2001

    Reported

    Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 111 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 8 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. The amendment recommended by the Committee on Ways and Means now printed in the bill shall be considered as adopted. Measure will be considered read. A specified amendment is in order.

    Source: Floor

  8. 3 April 2001

    Reported

    Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Ways and Means. H. Rept. 107-37. (text of measure as reported: CR 4/4/2001 H1424-1426)

    Source: Committee

  9. 3 April 2001

    Calendars

    Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 26.

    Source: Calendars

  10. 3 April 2001

    Reported

    Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Ways and Means. H. Rept. 107-37.(text of measure as reported: CR 4/4/2001 H1424-1426)

    Source: Committee

  11. 4 April 2001

    Vote

    On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 274 - 154 (Roll no. 84).

    Source: Floor

  12. 4 April 2001

    Passed

    Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    Source: Floor

  13. 4 April 2001

    Vote

    Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 274 - 154 (Roll no. 84).

    Source: Floor

  14. 4 April 2001

    Vote

    On motion to recommit with instructions Failed by recorded vote: 192 - 235 (Roll No. 83). (text: CR H1456)

    Source: Floor

  15. 4 April 2001

    Floor

    The previous question on the motion to recommit with instructions was ordered without objection.

    Source: Floor

  16. 4 April 2001

    Floor

    Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 8 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. The amendment recommended by the Committee on Ways and Means now printed in the bill shall be considered as adopted. Measure will be considered read. A specified amendment is in order.

    Source: Floor

  17. 4 April 2001

    Floor

    Mr. Pomeroy moved to recommit with instructions to Ways and Means.

    Source: Floor

  18. 4 April 2001

    Floor

    The previous question on the amendment and on the bill as amended, was ordered pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 111.

    Source: Floor

  19. 4 April 2001

    Floor

    Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 111. (consideration: CR H1424-1458)

    Source: Floor

  20. 4 April 2001

    Passed

    Rule H. Res. 111 passed House.

    Source: Floor

  21. 5 April 2001

    Calendars

    Received in the Senate. Read the first time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under Read the First Time.

    Source: Calendars

  22. 6 April 2001

    Calendars

    Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 33.

    Source: Calendars

  23. 13 August 2001

    Committee

    See H.R.1836.

    Source: Committee

  24. 11 June 2002

    Floor

    Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S5343-5358)

    Source: Floor

  25. 12 June 2002

    Floor

    Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S5398-5434)

    Source: Floor

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

11 official files

Placed on Calendar Senate (text)

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

Showing 48 of 226 sponsors and actors.

Related records

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.