PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · S

S. 460 (105th)

Home-Based Business Fairness Act of 1997

openUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

18 March 1997

Last action

31 July 1997 · Introduced

Status

Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S8471-8472)

Sponsors

Sen. Bond, Christopher S. [R-MO], Rep. Snowe, Olympia J. [R-ME-2], Sen. Nickles, Don [R-OK], Sen. Burns, Conrad R. [R-MT], Sen. Warner, John [R-VA], Sen. Faircloth, Lauch [R-NC], Sen. Murkowski, Frank H. [R-AK], Rep. Inhofe, James M. [R-OK-1], Sen. Enzi, Michael B. [R-WY], Sen. Hutchinson, Tim [R-AR], Sen. Mack, Connie, III [R-FL], Sen. Mikulski, Barbara A. [D-MD], Sen. Grams, Rod [R-MN], Rep. Gregg, Judd [R-NH-2], Sen. Hagel, Chuck [R-NE], Rep. Cochran, Thad [R-MS-4], Sen. Shelby, Richard C. [D-AL], Susan Collins, Rep. Kyl, Jon [R-AZ-4], Sen. Gramm, Phil [R-TX], Rep. Roberts, Pat [R-KS-1], Sen. Ashcroft, John [R-MO], Rep. Thomas, Craig [R-WY-At Large], Sen. Hutchison, Kay Bailey [R-TX], Sen. Helms, Jesse [R-NC], Sen. Lugar, Richard G. [R-IN], Sen. Coverdell, Paul [R-GA], Rep. DeWine, Mike [R-OH-7], Sen. Hatch, Orrin G. [R-UT], Sen. Bennett, Robert F. [R-UT], Mitch McConnell, Sen. Coats, Daniel [R-IN], Sen. Frist, William H. [R-TN], Sen. Sessions, Jeff [R-AL], Sen. Gorton, Slade [R-WA], Sen. Kempthorne, Dirk [R-ID], Rep. Craig, Larry E. [R-ID-1]

Subjects

Taxation

Source updated

21 August 2025

Taxation

Summary

Home-Based Business Fairness Act of 1997 - Amends the Internal Revenue Code to increase the deduction allowed for the health insurance costs of a self-employed individual to allow as a deduction an amount equal to the amount paid by such individual for insurance which constitutes medical care for such individual, such individual's spouse, and dependents. Adds to provisions defining the disallowance of certain expenses in connection the business use of the home to provide that a home office shall in any case qualify as the principal place of business if the office is: (1) in the location where the taxpayer's essential administrative or management activities are conducted on a regular and systematic basis; and (2) necessary because the taxpayer has no other location for the performance of the essential management or administrative activities of the business. Considers a service provider as not being an employee if the provider: (1) can realize a profit or loss, can incur unreimbursed expenses, and makes a time-limited or task-limited agreement; (2) has a principal place of business, does not primarily provide service at a single service recipient's facilities, pays fair rent for the use of the recipient's facilities, or operates primarily with equipment not supplied by the recipient; and (3) if there is a written contract providing that the provider will not be treated as an employee for Federal tax purposes. Considers (in addition) a provider as not an employee if: (1) there is such a written contract; and (2) the provider is a corporation or limited liability company and does not receive benefits that the recipient's employees receive. Regulates the treatment of determinations by the Secretary of the Treasury that a service provider should have been treated as an employee.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 18 March 1997

    Introduced

    Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 18 March 1997

    Introduced

    Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S2429-2430)

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 18 March 1997

    Introduced

    Introduced in Senate

    Source: IntroReferral

  4. 5 June 1997

    Committee

    Subcommittee on Taxation & IRS Oversight. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 105-907.

    Source: Committee

  5. 31 July 1997

    Introduced

    Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S8471-8472)

    Source: IntroReferral

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

3 official files

Sponsors

Related records

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.