Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Resolution · HRES

H.Res. 1364 (111th)

Honoring the historic and community significance of the Chatham County Courthouse and expressing condolences to Chatham County and the town of Pittsboro for the fire damage sustained by the courthouse on March 25, 2010.

passedUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

18 May 2010

Last action

19 May 2010 · Floor

Status

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Sponsors

Rep. Etheridge, Bob [D-NC-2], Rep. Price, David E. [D-NC-4], Rep. Filner, Bob [D-CA-51], Rep. Owens, William L. [D-NY-23], Rep. Shuler, Heath [D-NC-11], Rep. Myrick, Sue Wilkins [R-NC-9], Rep. Cooper, Jim [D-TN-5], Rep. McIntyre, Mike [D-NC-7], Rep. Butterfield, G. K. [D-NC-1], Rep. Jones, Walter B., Jr. [R-NC-3], Rep. Chandler, Ben [D-KY-6], Rep. Maloney, Carolyn B. [D-NY-12], Rep. Coble, Howard [R-NC-6], Rep. Kissell, Larry [D-NC-8], Rep. Foxx, Virginia [R-NC-5], Rep. Watt, Melvin L. [D-NC-12], Rep. Miller, Brad [D-NC-13], Rep. McHenry, Patrick T. [R-NC-10]

Subjects

Rule of law

Source updated

2 January 2025

Rule of law

Summary

Expresses condolences to the North Carolina court system, Chatham County, and the town of Pittsboro for the tragic loss of the Chatham County Courthouse. Commends the heroic actions of the Chatham County firefighters and first responders who worked tirelessly to combat the Courthouse fire, minimize the damage to the Courthouse and the historic materials contained therein, and protect the public. Recognizes the community significance of the Courthouse as both the most significant historic landmark and the cornerstone of justice and the rule of law in Chatham County. recognizes the impact that more than a century of landmark court decisions has made on the judicial system of the Town of Pittsboro, Chatham County, and North Carolina. Recognizes the impact that more than a century of landmark court decisions has made on the judicial system of the town of Pittsboro, Chatham County, and North Carolina.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 18 May 2010

    Floor

    DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H. Res. 1364.

    Source: Floor

  2. 18 May 2010

    Floor

    Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H3501-3502)

    Source: Floor

  3. 18 May 2010

    Floor

    Mr. Johnson (GA) moved to suspend the rules and agree to the resolution.

    Source: Floor

  4. 18 May 2010

    Introduced

    Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

    Source: IntroReferral

  5. 18 May 2010

    Introduced

    Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H3515)

    Source: IntroReferral

  6. 18 May 2010

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  7. 18 May 2010

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  8. 18 May 2010

    Floor

    At the conclusion of debate, the chair put the question on the motion to suspend the rules. Mr. Johnson (GA) objected to the vote on the grounds that a quorum was not present. Further proceedings on the motion were postponed. The point of no quorum was withdrawn.

    Source: Floor

  9. 19 May 2010

    Passed

    Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    Source: Floor

  10. 19 May 2010

    Vote

    On motion to suspend the rules and agree to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote (2/3 required): 406 - 1 (Roll no. 283). (text: CR 5/18/2010 H3501)

    Source: Floor

  11. 19 May 2010

    Vote

    Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and agree to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote (2/3 required): 406 - 1 (Roll no. 283).(text: CR 5/18/2010 H3501)

    Source: Floor

  12. 19 May 2010

    Floor

    Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H3623)

    Source: Floor

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

6 official files

Engrossed in House (text)

View fileDownload file

This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Engrossed in House (text)

    Engrossed in House · EN · 19 May 2010

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Engrossed in House (PDF)

    Engrossed in House · EN · 19 May 2010

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Passed House without amendment

    summary · EN · 19 May 2010

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House (text)

    Introduced in House · EN · 18 May 2010

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House (PDF)

    Introduced in House · EN · 18 May 2010

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House

    summary · EN · 18 May 2010

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.