Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Resolution · HRES

H.Res. 616 (115th)

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2874) to achieve reforms to improve the financial stability of the National Flood Insurance Program, to enhance the development of more accurate estimates of flood risk through new technology and better maps, to increase the role of private markets in the management of flood insurance risks, and to provide for alternative methods to insure against flood peril, and for other purposes, and providing for consideration of the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 2810) to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2018 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other purposes.

passedUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

13 November 2017

Last action

14 November 2017 · Floor

Status

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Sponsors

Rep. Byrne, Bradley [R-AL-1]

Subjects

Defence, Energy, Taxation

Source updated

7 April 2025

Defence · Energy · Taxation

Summary

Sets forth the rule for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2874) to achieve reforms to improve the financial stability of the National Flood Insurance Program, to enhance the development of more accurate estimates of flood risk through new technology and better maps, to increase the role of private markets in the management of flood insurance risks, and to provide for alternative methods to insure against flood peril, and for other purposes, and providing for consideration of the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 2810) to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2018 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 13 November 2017

    Calendars

    Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 101.

    Source: Calendars

  2. 13 November 2017

    Floor

    The resolution provides for one hour of general debate and closed rule for H.R. 2874. Also, the resolution provides for consideration of the conference report to accompany H.R. 2810.

    Source: Floor

  3. 13 November 2017

    Reported

    The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 115-408, by Mr. Byrne.

    Source: Committee

  4. 13 November 2017

    Reported

    The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 115-408, by Mr. Byrne.

    Source: Committee

  5. 13 November 2017

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  6. 14 November 2017

    Passed

    Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    Source: Floor

  7. 14 November 2017

    Vote

    On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 233 - 187 (Roll no. 627). (text: CR H9191)

    Source: Floor

  8. 14 November 2017

    Vote

    Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 233 - 187 (Roll no. 627).(text: CR H9191)

    Source: Floor

  9. 14 November 2017

    Vote

    On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 234 - 189 (Roll no. 626).

    Source: Floor

  10. 14 November 2017

    Floor

    DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 616.

    Source: Floor

  11. 14 November 2017

    Floor

    Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H9191-9199)

    Source: Floor

Votes

14 November 2017 · passed · On Agreeing to the Resolution · Passed · Official source

Yes 233 · No 187 · Abstain — · Absent/not voting 13

Showing the first 4 recorded positions. Vote totals above are complete.

14 November 2017 · passed · On Ordering the Previous Question · Passed · Official source

Yes 234 · No 189 · Abstain — · Absent/not voting 10

Showing the first 4 recorded positions. Vote totals above are complete.

Versions

Documents

5 official files

Engrossed in House (text)

View fileDownload file

This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Engrossed in House (text)

    Engrossed in House · EN · 14 November 2017

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Engrossed in House (PDF)

    Engrossed in House · EN · 14 November 2017

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Reported in House (text)

    Reported in House · EN · 13 November 2017

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Reported in House (PDF)

    Reported in House · EN · 13 November 2017

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House

    summary · EN · 13 November 2017

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.