Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Resolution · SRES

S.Res. 170 (96th)

A resolution to require documentation for reimbursements out of Senators' Official Office Expense Accounts from the contingent fund of the Senate.

passedUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

23 May 1979

Last action

2 August 1979 · Floor

Status

Measure passed Senate.

Sponsors

Sen. Hatfield, Mark O. [R-OR], Sen. Stevenson, Adlai E., III [D-IL], Sen. Schmitt, Harrison H. [R-NM], Sen. Burdick, Quentin N. [D-ND], Sen. Helms, Jesse [R-NC], Sen. Morgan, Robert B. [D-NC]

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

14 January 2025

Summary

Requires that documentation be submitted with vouchers for reimbursements out of Senators' Official Office Expense Accounts.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 23 May 1979

    Introduced

    Introduced in Senate

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 23 May 1979

    Introduced

    Referred to Senate Committee on Rules and Administration.

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 30 July 1979

    Reported

    Reported to Senate from the Committee on Rules and Administration, S. Rept. 96-275.

    Source: Committee

  4. 30 July 1979

    Reported

    Reported to Senate from the Committee on Rules and Administration, S. Rept. 96-275.

    Source: Committee

  5. 2 August 1979

    Passed

    Passed/agreed to in Senate: Measure passed Senate.

    Source: Floor

  6. 2 August 1979

    Floor

    Call of calendar in Senate.

    Source: Floor

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.