Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Resolution · SRES

S.Res. 234 (107th)

A resolution reiterating the sense of the Senate that religious freedom is a priority of the United States Senate in the bilateral relationship with the Russian Federation, including within the context of the Jackson-Vanik Amendment.

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

10 April 2002

Last action

10 April 2002 · Introduced

Status

Referred to the Committee on Finance. (text of measure as introduced: CR S2489-2490)

Sponsors

Sen. Smith, Gordon H. [R-OR], Sen. Clinton, Hillary Rodham [D-NY], Sen. Harkin, Tom [D-IA], Sen. Mikulski, Barbara A. [D-MD], Sen. Warner, John [R-VA], Sen. Wellstone, Paul D. [D-MN], Sen. Sessions, Jeff [R-AL], Sen. Bayh, Evan [D-IN], Sen. Hatch, Orrin G. [R-UT], Sen. McConnell, Mitch [R-KY], Sen. Durbin, Richard J. [D-IL], Sen. Cleland, Max [D-GA], Sen. Lieberman, Joseph I. [ID-CT], Sen. Allen, George [R-VA], Sen. Hagel, Chuck [R-NE], Sen. Nelson, Bill [D-FL], Sen. Reid, Harry [D-NV], Sen. Nickles, Don [R-OK], Sen. Schumer, Charles E. [D-NY], Sen. Feingold, Russell D. [D-WI], Sen. Conrad, Kent [D-ND], Sen. Leahy, Patrick J. [D-VT], Sen. Graham, Bob [D-FL], Sen. Feinstein, Dianne [D-CA], Sen. Reed, Jack [D-RI], Sen. Corzine, Jon S. [D-NJ], Sen. Wyden, Ron [D-OR], Sen. Johnson, Tim [D-SD]

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

14 January 2025

Summary

Expresses the sense of the Senate that: (1) religious freedom and the protection of minority rights must remain as priority issues on the bilateral agenda of both the United States and the Russian Federation; (2) any U.S. actions to "graduate" or terminate the application of the Jackson-Vanik Amendment (free emigration as a condition for granting normal trade relations to non-market economies) to any individual country must take into account the progress already achieved through the application of such amendment as well as appropriate assurances regarding the continued commitment of such country to enforcing the fundamental human rights envisioned by the amendment; and (3) the U.S. Government must demonstrate how, in "graduating" individual countries, the "continued dedication of the United States" to these fundamental rights will be assured.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 10 April 2002

    Introduced

    Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S2490)

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 10 April 2002

    Introduced

    Referred to the Committee on Finance. (text of measure as introduced: CR S2489-2490)

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 10 April 2002

    Introduced

    Introduced in Senate

    Source: IntroReferral

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

3 official files

Introduced in Senate (text)

View fileDownload file

This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in Senate (text)

    Introduced in Senate · EN · 10 April 2002

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Introduced in Senate (PDF)

    Introduced in Senate · EN · 10 April 2002

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in Senate

    summary · EN · 10 April 2002

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.