Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Resolution · SRES

S.Res. 457 (94th)

A resolution to refer the bill (S. 3518) entitled "A bill for the relief of Sea Gate, Inc., a North Carolina corporation, and Charles M. Reeves, Jr." to the Chief Commissioner of the U.S. Court of Claims for a report thereon.

passedUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

4 June 1976

Last action

9 August 1976 · Passed

Status

Measure passed Senate.

Sponsors

Sen. Helms, Jesse [R-NC], Sen. Morgan, Robert B. [D-NC]

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

10 August 2026

Summary

Refers S. 3518, entitled "A bill for the relief of Sea Gate, Inc., a North Carolina corporation, and Charles M. Reeves, Jr.," to the Chief Commissioner of the United States Court of Claims for a report thereon.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 4 June 1976

    Introduced

    Referred to Senate Committee on the Judiciary.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 4 June 1976

    Introduced

    Introduced in Senate

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 6 August 1976

    Reported

    Reported to Senate from the Committee on the Judiciary, S. Rept. 94-1131.

    Source: Committee

  4. 6 August 1976

    Reported

    Reported to Senate from the Committee on the Judiciary, S. Rept. 94-1131.

    Source: Committee

  5. 9 August 1976

    Passed

    Measure passed Senate.

    Source: Floor

  6. 9 August 1976

    Passed

    Passed/agreed to in Senate: Measure passed Senate.

    Source: Floor

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.