PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Germany · Motion · Antrag

19/10222

30 years of suppression of the peaceful protests at Tiananmen Square - For a comprehensive reckoning and respect for civil and human rights

rejectedGermany· German Bundestag· DE

Introduced

15 May 2019

Last action

7 November 2019 · Beratung

Status

Abgelehnt

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

23 November 2023

Summary

Hinwirken auf chinesische Regierung zur Aufarbeitung der Tiananmen-Massaker sowie zur Rehabilitierung der Opfer und Hinterbliebenen, Einsatz für Freilassung von Bürgerrechtlern und Achtung der Menschenrechte, freie Berufsausübung von Auslandskorrespondenten, Wiedereröffnung des Tiananmen-Museums in Hongkong, Unterstützung des öffentlichen Gedenkens in Deutschland; kohärente deutsche und europäische China-Politik auf Grundlage universeller Menschenrechte und Rechtsstaatlichkeit

Machine translation from German. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

  1. 15 May 2019

    Motion

    30 years of suppression of the peaceful protests at Tiananmen Square - For a comprehensive reckoning and respect for civil and human rights

    Source: BT

  2. 6 June 2019

    Beratung

    30 years of suppression of the peaceful protests at Tiananmen Square - For a comprehensive reckoning and respect for civil and human rights

    Source: BT

  3. 21 October 2019

    Recommendation and report

    30 years of suppression of the peaceful protests at Tiananmen Square - For a comprehensive reckoning and respect for civil and human rights

    Source: BT

  4. 7 November 2019

    Beratung

    30 years of suppression of the peaceful protests at Tiananmen Square - For a comprehensive reckoning and respect for civil and human rights

    Source: BT

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

2 official files

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.