PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

France · Question · Question écrite

10210

Question 10210 — maternity health insurance

openFrance· National Assembly· FR

Introduced

14 October 2025

Last action

14 October 2025 · Question

Status

posée

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

14 October 2025

Summary

Ms. Anne-Cécile Violland draws the attention of the Minister of Labor, Health, Solidarity, Families, Autonomy and Disabled People to the threat currently weighing on the coverage of osteopathic care by complementary health insurance organizations. Indeed, several recent reports and in particular that of the Senate of September 24, 2024 and that of the three High Councils published in July 2025 recommend to exclude osteopathy and other health practices from the category of responsible contracts, on the grounds of insufficient scientific evidence. However, osteopathy is a regulated profession, benefiting from 5,000 hours of training over five years, registered with the ARS and popular with the French: 55% have used it over the last five years and 82% of citizens say they are opposed to its delisting. Such a measure would have serious consequences: renunciation of care for the most modest, work stoppages and medication prescriptions, therefore ultimately increasing the costs of compulsory health insurance. She therefore asks him what guarantees he intends to provide to maintain equitable access to osteopathic care via responsible contracts and to prevent a short-term budgetary decision from producing, with the desired objective, an inflation of social spending and a worsening of inequalities in access to care.

Machine translation from French. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

  1. 14 October 2025

    Question

    Source: DateQuestion

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.