Question 10325 — social and solidarity economy

Summary

Ms. Cyrielle Chatelain alerts the Minister of Labor, Full Employment and Integration to the fragile situation of educational projects organized by specialized prevention associations. Indeed, until now, circular DGEFP/DAS No. 99/27 of June 29, 1999 had ensured a derogatory status for specialized prevention intermediary associations (AIPS) (putting in place socialization supports through a paid activity) making it possible to distinguish them from “intermediary integration associations” (whose aim is to offer an integration path through economic activity). This exceptional status has allowed each year since 1999 thousands of young people facing processes of marginalization or exclusion to participate in educational projects and thus benefit from an education and prevention tool upstream and in complementarity with the professional integration schemes. However, the sub-directorate of access to employment pathways has confirmed the legal lapse of this exceptional status due to the implementation of law no. 2020-1577 of December 14, 2020 relating to the strengthening of inclusion in employment through economic activity and the “zero long-term unemployed territory” experiment. This law unfortunately neglected to take into account the specificities specialized intermediary prevention associations which set up educational projects, which forces the people they recruit to have to be declared on the inclusion platform in order to obtain an IAE PASS. This individualized monitoring is in contradiction with the missions of specialized intermediary prevention associations and educational projects which are part of global care and a collective approach in partnership with local authorities, social landlords, neighborhood associations and families. Among the negative effects of this legal change, we can also note that it prevents young people under the age of 16 or young people in school from being employed on educational sites, who nevertheless constitute an important audience for specialized prevention. In the same way, it makes incompatible the remuneration for educational projects with the youth engagement contract (CEJ). Due to the proven risk of seeing educational projects disappear, a tool that has proven itself for the integration of young people in difficulty or socially disrupted, she asks what legal provisions, and within what time frame, the Government plans to take so that specialized prevention associations regain the exceptional status for them. allowing once again to implement its educational projects.

Machine translation from French. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.