Question· Question écrite16949open
France · National Assembly · 14 July 2026
Ms. Cyrielle Chatelain questions the Minister of Cities and Housing on the assessment of the application of Law No. 2022-270 of February 28, 2022 for fairer, simpler and more transparent access to the borrower insurance market. This law notably introduced the possibility of canceling borrower insurance at any time, strengthened information for borrowers, reduced the period of the right to be forgotten for certain pathologies to five years and removed the health questionnaire for certain real estate loans, subject to conditions of amount and age. More than four years after its entry into force, it appears necessary to have a precise assessment of its concrete application for households. It requests the following information from it: the number of households having actually benefited from these provisions, the average amount of loans concerned, the profile of borrowers having been able to access these measures, as well as the observed evolution of borrower insurance prices since the entry into force of the law. It also wishes to know the number of insurance substitution requests accepted and refused, the main reasons for refusal by lending institutions, as well as the number of sanctions potentially imposed in the event of non-compliance with information or processing obligations. requests. Finally, she asks him if the Government intends to make public a complete assessment of this reform, in particular its effects on access to real estate credit, the purchasing power of households and equal treatment between borrowers. She would also like to know whether the Government plans to change this system in order to take into account the difficulties observed since its entry into force, in particular by reassessing the capital ceiling giving right to the removal of the medical questionnaire, so that it is better adapted to the evolution of real estate prices, as well as by studying an alignment of the age limit for reimbursement with that retained within the framework of the AERAS agreement.
Question· Question écrite15888open
France · National Assembly · 9 June 2026
Mrs Cyrielle Chatelain questions the Minister of Labor and Solidarity on the worrying attacks on the independence of the labor inspection within the framework of the territorial organization of the State (OTE). For several years, the union organizations of the Ministry of Labor have been warning about the consequences of the reform of the OTE and the placement of interministerial departmental directorates under the authority of the prefects. They denounce a progressive weakening of the independence of the labor inspection, although guaranteed by Convention No. 81 of the International Labor Organization (ILO), ratified by France. While an expert report on psychosocial risks within the Ministry of Labor must be presented on June 18, 2026 before the ministerial CHSCT, several recent events occurring in Isère illustrate the concerns expressed by for a long time by staff representatives. On the occasion of May 1, 2026, labor inspection agents undertook an information campaign aimed at employers in order to remind them of the legal framework applicable to the compulsory non-working nature of this day. These agents also planned control operations intended to guarantee respect for employees' rights. According to several elements made public by the union representatives, these steps would have been hampered by the hierarchy of the departmental directorate of employment, labor and solidarity (DDETS) of Isère, in particular by the withholding of information letters and announcements of controls while awaiting national instructions. At the same time, several agents involved in these efforts are now the subject of disciplinary or legal proceedings, giving rise to strong concern about the existence of possible reprisal measures against agents who have carried out their control missions in compliance with labor law. Furthermore, certain agents indicate that they were asked to participate in CODAF operations linked to the fight against drug trafficking via instructions transmitted under the direct authority of the prefecture, further blurring the necessary separation between the missions of control of labor law and prefectural management. These difficulties fit more broadly into a context of profound weakening of labor inspection, subject to a particularly worrying “double scissors”. On the one hand, the continued reduction in staff numbers has led to a historically low level in the number of control agents, falling from around 2,300 at the start of Emmanuel Macron's first five-year term to almost 1,800 today, to ensure the control of more than 2.2 million companies, now placing France among the least equipped countries in Europe in terms of labor inspection. On the other hand, staff representatives denounce the deleterious effects of new public management logic, marked by service management based on quantified objectives and control tables, to the detriment of the meaning of service missions. public, the quality of the control exercised and the mental health of agents. These situations appear to be contrary to the commitments made by the Government in 2014 aimed at maintaining a specific hierarchical line for labor inspection in order to preserve its independence, in accordance with the requirements of ILO Convention No. 81. In this context, she asks what measures the Government intends to take to guarantee effectively the independence of the labor inspection, to prevent any undue hierarchical or prefectural interference in control missions, to preserve the human resources necessary for the exercise of these missions and to protect agents carrying out their functions in compliance with labor law.
Question· Question écrite15329open
France · National Assembly · 26 May 2026
Ms. Cyrielle Chatelain draws the attention of the Minister of the Economy, Finance and Industrial, Energy and Digital Sovereignty to the consequences of article 135 of the finance law for 2026, which entered into force on March 1, 2026, which removes the apprenticeship tax exemption from which associations benefited until now. Indeed, this reform profoundly modifies the tax framework applicable to the non-profit sector by integrating, in principle, employer associations into the scope of structures liable for this tax, including when they are not subject to corporate tax. This development leads to a direct increase in costs, the tax being based on the payroll and is added to other contributions already supported by these structures, in particular the payroll tax. In a context where many associations play an essential role in social cohesion, support for vulnerable groups, education and even professional integration, this new financial burden raises serious concerns. In particular, it could lead certain structures to reduce their capacity for action, to limit their investments, or even to slow down their recruitments or to forgo certain hirings, due to budgetary constraints. increased. Furthermore, this reform raises questions about its fairness, to the extent that associations, often beneficiaries of funding linked to professional training, simultaneously become contributors to this system, without specific modalities adapted to their operation having been clearly defined to date. So, what measures does the Government intend to put in place to support the associations faced with this increase in charges? What adjustments or partial exemptions are envisaged for the most fragile structures? She also asks him how he intends to prevent this reform from having the effect of slowing down hiring and reducing the financial capacities of associations, to the detriment of their missions of general interest.
Question· Question écrite14128open
France · National Assembly · 7 April 2026
Ms. Cyrielle Chatelain questions the Minister of Health, Families, Autonomy and People with Disabilities about the digital travel guide, how to support your child in their exploration. This guide is intended for families, about the risks of digital technology, designed according to the introductory words of the document, "to offer simple benchmarks, concrete advice and tools adapted to each age", distributed in partnership between others with Arcom and cybermalveillance.gouv.fr, and presented in the colors of the French Republic. However, this guide was designed by Google and YouTube: the logos of these American digital giants are displayed in very large size on the cover and the final page. Throughout the 20 pages, the mentions of these two private players in Big Tech are constant, through references, advertisements, iconography. Google applications and YouTube, Family Link and YouTube Kids, are explicitly described and recommended to readers with the credit and encouragement of the French State under the heading “Putting in place the right tools” on pages 8 and 9; but also recommended for “learning something new for school” on page 10 or “for learning and better understanding the world” by following YouTube channels, page 11; and then adolescents are encouraged to use Google’s AI assistant, Gemini, “to deepen their knowledge” on page 14; and parents to click on an awareness program financed by Google on page 17. All in all, this guide is an ode to the supposed virtues of two digital behemoths, whose practices we know are, on the contrary, extremely toxic for digital users: addictive algorithms, privileged violent and hateful content because they bring in more money, looting of personal data, commercial targeting of people, etc. In the introduction to the guide, the Minister indicates that it is necessary to “prevent exposure to unsuitable content” and “limit exposure to violent content and addiction mechanisms created by certain platforms”. And on page 19, it is specified that to learn how to fight against digital threats, you must: “ preserve your personal data. She would like to know why she agrees to preface a document produced by private actors whose economic model is based on the addiction, including of the youngest, to the products of the platforms. She would also like to know why public structures distribute this document, and why not promote CNIL tools like FantomApp.
Question· Question écrite14009answered
France · National Assembly · 31 March 2026
Ms. Cyrielle Chatelain draws the attention of the Minister of Labor and Solidarity to the situations of social precariousness of employees employed under intermittent micro-contracts in the communication, advertising, merchandising and events sectors. Many people involved in commercial events, promotional operations or merchandising actions in supermarkets are employed via a succession of very short contracts: temporary contracts, temporary permanent contracts, fixed-term contracts, fixed-term contracts (CDDU) or service provision contracts. These employees thus carry out missions of a few hours or a few days, for multiple employers, without contractual continuity, despite regular professional activity. This extreme fragmentation of employment has social consequences major. In the event of sick leave, the current rules for calculating daily allowances frequently result in refusals of coverage or in derisory amounts, due to periods of affiliation that are too short or discontinuous, even though the people concerned are contributing. Difficulties are also significant in terms of access to specific temporary work arrangements, such as those provided by the FASTT, due to failure to reach the required hourly thresholds. Furthermore, many employers do not systematically transmit end-of-contract documents for micro-missions, further complicating the opening of social rights and procedures with the competent organizations. The discontinuity of contracts also leads to frequent interruptions of supplementary health coverage. These practices also call into question the effectiveness of controls. The services of URSSAF and the labor inspectorate face structural difficulties in traceability of these forms of employment, due to the multiplicity of contracts, intermediaries and principals, limiting the detection of breaches of social obligations, particularly in terms of declaration, transmission of contract ends and legal qualification of employment relationships. In this context, she wishes to know what measures the Government intends to take to: · adapt the rules for opening and calculating social rights, particularly in terms of daily allowances, to the realities of discontinuous and fragmented work; enforce the law concerning employers' obligations regarding the transmission of end-of-contract documents, including for very short missions, as well as related controls and sanctions; strengthen the means and the control tools of URSSAF and the Labor Inspectorate in order to ensure effective traceability of these forms of employment and to combat practices that circumvent labor law; make ordering companies, in particular major brands and brands, responsible for the employment conditions of employees working on their behalf; and guarantee effective continuity of social rights for employees who work regularly but today remain insufficiently protected by labor and social security law.
Question· Question écrite13594answered
France · National Assembly · 17 March 2026
Mrs Cyrielle Chatelain questions the Minister of Higher Education, Research and Space on the budgetary situation of French universities, which is causing great concern within the university community. For several years, higher education establishments have been facing a continuous decline in their resources in constant euros, even though the number of students has increased significantly. This development is accompanied a reduction in the supervision rate, an increasing use of contract staff, as well as a freezing or elimination of tenured positions, particularly lecturers. Furthermore, the preponderant share of the payroll in university budgets, combined with the insufficiency of compensation for salary measures decided at national level, weakens the financial balance of establishments. Many universities are today in deficit, which leads to austerity plans, a deterioration of staff working conditions, a reduction in the capacity to welcome and support students and slows down research. In addition, the establishment of objectives, means and performance contracts, conditioning part of the financing on the achievement of nationally defined objectives, raises questions about the respect for the principle of equality between establishments and the adaptation of university policies to territorial realities. In this context, she asks what concrete measures the Government intends to take to guarantee sustainable and sufficient funding for public universities. She also asks him how he intends to respond to the growing precariousness of teaching, research and BIATSS staff and what Guarantees will be provided to preserve equal access to higher education throughout the country.
Question· Question écrite10748answered
France · National Assembly · 4 November 2025
Le ministère l'Europe et des affaires étrangères a réagi dès l'annonce de ces sanctions, en août 2025, par un communiqué officiel dans lequel la France a exprimé sa « consternation » face aux sanctions américaines. Paris « exprime sa solidarité à l'égard des magistrats visés par cette décision » et estime que ces sanctions sont « contraires au principe d'indépendance de la justice ». Le garde des Sceaux, ministre de la justice, a rappelé lors de la 24ème assemblée des États parties de la Cour pénale internationale (CPI), le 1er décembre 2025, le plein soutien de la France au mandat de la CPI. Il a condamné les menaces et les mesures coercitives contre la Cour, son personnel et les organisations de la société civile qui l'appuient, qui sont une atteinte à son indépendance. En février 2026, le Président de la République a écrit à son homologue américain pour lui demander la levée des sanctions contre le magistrat français, arguant que « les sanctions adoptées contre M. Nicolas Guillou portent atteinte au principe d'indépendance de la justice et au mandat de la CPI ». Le 6 mars 2026, à la demande conjointe du garde des Sceaux, ministre de la justice et de son homologue slovène, les ministres de la justice des États membres de l'Union européenne ont entendu le témoignage du juge français à la CPI, M. Nicolas Guillou et sa collègue slovène Mme Beti Hohler, elle aussi placée sous sanctions américaines, lors du conseil justice et affaires intérieures de l'Union européenne à Bruxelles. A cette occasion, les deux magistrats ont exposé les conséquences concrètes des sanctions américaines prononcées à leur égard. La France et l'Union européenne ont réitéré leur soutien à la Cour pénale internationale, ainsi qu'à son personnel et ont condamné ces sanctions. Le garde des Sceaux, ministre de la justice, a insisté pour qu'une réaction politique au niveau européen puisse avoir lieu, et sur l'importance de réduire nos dépendances vis-à-vis d'États tiers. Ces sanctions fragilisent la justice internationale à laquelle l'Union européenne et la France sont attachées. Des discussions sont en cours au niveau européen pour étudier les modalités de l'activation du règlement de blocage, à laquelle la France est favorable. La souveraineté numérique est au coeur de l'action de la Ministre de l'IA et du numérique. Elle se traduit concrètement en trois priorités: Soutenir l'offre, pour disposer d'une offre nationale et européenne de services numériques innovants et compétitifs qui viendra bénéficier à tout l'écosystème; Identifier nos dépendances et œuvrer à les réduire avec nos partenaires européens; Faire respecter nos règles et nos valeurs en Europe. Ces dernières années, le Gouvernement a engagé des travaux importants pour renforcer sa souveraineté sur le plan numérique, et limiter ses dépendances aux solutions extracommunautaires. La stratégie numérique de l'État s'est notamment fixée comme priorité le renforcement significatif de la maîtrise par l'État de ses systèmes d'information. La « Suite numérique » incarne une avancée majeure vers l'autonomie technologique de la France et de l'Europe. Développée sous l'égide de la direction interministérielle du numérique (DINUM) et déployée à large échelle depuis 2026, cette alternative open source aux outils dominants (essentiellement américains) offre aux agents publics des services souverains de visioconférence (Visio), de transfert de données (France Transfert), et de messagerie instantanée (Tchap) opérés et hébergés en Europe et protégés contre les ingérences extérieures. Avec plus de 500 000 utilisateurs au sein de l'administration française et une intégration progressive de l'IA, la Suite numérique illustre une volonté politique concrète de réduire la dépendance aux logiciels américains tout en garantissant la sécurité des données et la continuité du service public. Ce projet, couplé à des initiatives comme l'euro numérique, l'observatoire de la souveraineté numérique, ou encore la nouvelle doctrine de la commande publique numérique, dessine une stratégie pour affranchir l'Europe des risques liés à l'extraterritorialité des sanctions américaines et renforcer sa résilience. En ce qui concerne les données, le Gouvernement s'est doté ces dernières années d'une stratégie cloud solide, qui doit permettre de renforcer notree indépendance vis-à-vis des solutions extracommunautaires et notamment américaines. Elle se décline en trois piliers. Le pilier « cloud de confiance » repose sur la qualification SecNumCloud. Délivrée par l'agence nationale de la sécurité des systèmes d'information (ANSSI), elle garantit un niveau de protection élevé des services qualifiés contre les accès non-autorisés aux données qu'ils hébergent et traitent, notamment par le recours à des lois extraterritoriales. (14 offres de 9 fournisseurs qualifiées SecNumCloud actuellement). Par ailleurs, grâce à la loi n°2024-449 du 21 mai 2024 aimed at sécuriser et réguler l'espace numérique (SREN), porté par le Gouvernement, et à la demande des parlementaires, les dispositions législatives relatives à la protection des données sensibles contre les législations extraterritoriales, s'agissant des administrations de l'État, ses opérateurs ou certains groupements d'intérêt public, ont été renforcées. Le pilier « cloud au centre » vise à stimuler l'achat public de cloud. En 2025, le marché du cloud passé par l'État représentait 84 millions d'euros, orienté à plus de 70 % vers du cloud européen. Le pilier « stratégie d'accélération cloud », qui s'appuie sur France 2030, vise à renforcer l'offre de cloud en France. Avec 450 millions d'euros déjà investis au travers de plusieurs appels à projets, c'est une offre cloud européenne et en particulier française qui s'étoffe. Entre 2021 et 2025, l'offre des Cloud Service Providers français s'est étoffée. Des progrès sont observés dans les domaines du IaaS, ainsi que des services managés de sécurité, d'analyse de données et d'IA. Les acteurs cloud ont aussi développé des marketplace de services de tiers et ont mené une expansion internationale. Ces travaux doivent nous permettre de renforcer notre souveraineté numérique et de limiter nos dépendances aux acteurs extra-européens. C'est un enjeu d'indépendance et d'autonomie stratégique.
Question· Question écrite8582answered
France · National Assembly · 15 July 2025
Ms. Cyrielle Chatelain questions the Minister Delegate to the Minister of the Economy, Finance and Industrial and Digital Sovereignty, responsible for artificial intelligence and digital technology, on the impacts of the migration of public servers to Windows 11. The end of Windows 10 in favor of Windows 11, the new version of Microsoft software, is scheduled for October 14, 2025. A very large majority of PCs used by the public sector benefit from the Windows operating system and Windows 11 will not be compatible with a large proportion of computers. The MP therefore wishes to know what the State plans with regard to the transition to Windows 11 with a view to limiting the economic and environmental impacts linked to the replacement of computer equipment currently configured on Windows 10 in the public sector and asks to be informed of the total cost of the operations as well as the quantity of digital waste generated by the transition to Windows 11. She also wishes to know to what extent the choice of maintaining software of American origin is relevant today in view of the geopolitical context and the risks in terms of data sovereignty and security and whether responses are envisaged to ensure the sovereignty of France and State services in terms of software and data protection. Indeed, a prosecutor from the International Criminal Court recently saw his professional emails, hosted on Microsoft Outlook, be cut off at the request of President Trump, raising the question of the risks of foreign interference given the links between Microsoft and the American government. Finally, she asks him if, like other states (Germany, Denmark) and certain communities (Grenoble and more recently Lyon), the State plans to train administrations and systematize the use of Linux systems, whose free and open-source nature makes it possible to limit the risks of surveillance and planned obsolescence.
Question· Question écrite8168answered
France · National Assembly · 1 July 2025
Ms. Cyrielle Chatelain questions the Minister to the Minister of Labor, Health, Solidarity and Families, responsible for health and access to care, on the means that the Government intends to mobilize to ensure the sustainability and development of health centers, particularly non-profit ones, in a context of access to care crisis. While the medical shortage increasingly weakens the territories, the health centers appear to be essential players in the provision of local care, particularly in working-class neighborhoods and under-dense areas. Through their operation without excess fees, their coordinated and multi-professional approach and their strong involvement in prevention and public health actions, they constitute a fundamental lever for responding to social and territorial health inequalities. However, many of them today find themselves in great difficulty, sometimes even forced to close, due to lack of sufficient financial and regulatory support. The predominantly fee-for-service financing, unsuitable for the reality of their missions, puts them in constant tension. Added to this are inequalities in treatment with liberal structures in access to installation aid or innovative experiments (SECPA, PEPS, IPEP), as well as the financial impact of the application of Ségur de la santé, without compensation for associative centers. In a context where the national agreement which governs their relations with health insurance is being renegotiated, she would like to know what precise guidelines the Government has given to the CNAM to guarantee that this new agreement meets the challenges of accessibility, quality and coordination of care ; she would also like to know what specific funding is planned to enable associative health centers to meet their obligations arising from Ségur and, finally, what place it intends to give to health centers in the national strategy to combat inequalities in access to care.
Question· Question écrite6771open
France · National Assembly · 20 May 2025
Ms. Cyrielle Chatelain questions the Minister of State, Minister of National Education, Higher Education and Research, on freedom of expression and student union freedoms in higher education establishments. In December 2024, the Grenoble Student Union had a motion adopted by the board of directors and relayed its position via a publication on social networks. Following this taking of position, the president of the association was notified of the suspension of the association's approval by the university. A week later, she was informed of the referral to the disciplinary section against her, as well as of a report to the public prosecutor on the basis of article 40 of the code of criminal procedure. Among the reasons given to justify the disciplinary procedure is notably an attack on the reputation of the establishment. This particularly imprecise motive raises questions. The notion of reputation, not legally defined, can give rise to arbitrary interpretations, to the detriment of freedom of criticism, which is nevertheless constitutive of democratic debate in the university space. Such sanctions may have the effect of dissuading the union and activist engagement of students, even though the engagement student is recognized by the ministry as being a factor of emancipation, citizenship and democratic life at the university. The MP therefore wishes to question the Minister on the compatibility of such procedures with the effective guarantee of freedom of expression of student associations. She questions him about the measures that the Government intends to take so that vague reasons, such as damage to the reputation of a establishment, cannot be used to abusively restrict student union freedoms and repress critical engagement in higher education.
Question· Question écrite2263answered
France · National Assembly · 26 November 2024
Ms. Cyrielle Chatelain draws the attention of the Minister of Agriculture, Food Sovereignty and Forestry to the situation of caged laying hens on French farms. Following the adoption of the so-called EGalim law in 2018, it is now prohibited to install new caged laying hen farms or to increase the capacity of existing farms. This ban, specified by decree no. 2021-1647 of December 14 2021, applies both to the creation of new buildings and to the transformation of existing buildings for cage farming, as well as to any redevelopment aimed at increasing the number of hens raised in cages in facilities already in place. This regulation should logically lead to a gradual reduction in the share of eggs from cage farms, except in the event of an overall decline in national production. However, according to the figures from the National Committee for the Promotion of Eggs (CNPO), while total egg production increased by 4% in 2023, the proportion of eggs produced in cages has paradoxically increased, going from 23% to 27% between the end of 2022 and the end of 2023. Faced with this unexpected development, she questions him about any findings of violations of the regulations that have been noted since the implementation of the decree and about the measurements taken to remedy this. It also wishes to know the control systems implemented to guarantee compliance with these legal obligations.
Question· Question écrite740answered
France · National Assembly · 8 October 2024
Ms. Cyrielle Chatelain draws the attention of the Minister Delegate to the Minister for Partnership with Territories and Decentralization, responsible for transport, to the deployment of the Grenoble metropolitan RER. By announcing on May 12, 2024, in Le Dauphiné Libéré, the opening of a first section of the metropolitan regional express service (SERM) between Grenoble and Brignoud by 2025, the Prime Minister surprised all those involved. engaged on this issue for several years. While the project has still not been launched, an opening as early as 2025 is in fact unthinkable. The president of the Grenoble metropolis, after consulting the SNCF, indicates at best a commissioning by 2028, provided that the financing is gathered as quickly as possible, in order to finally launch the infrastructure work and the purchase of rolling stock. In view of the difficulties of circulation, modal shift and decarbonization objectives, but also in view of the alarming increase in TER delays and cancellations around the Grenoble railway hub, the metropolitan RER of this metropolis is a necessity. This project is thus supported by many communities and businesses in the region, but also elected officials from all political sides, eager to see it happen as quickly as possible. However, then Although the project has been ready for several years, its implementation is not moving forward. If Law No. 2023-1269 of December 27, 2023 relating to metropolitan regional express services known as the “SERM law” made it possible to clarify the legal and operational framework for creating these new SERMs, the Grenoble project still remains at the dock. For the moment, no public interest group, provided for by article 3 of the SERM law, has been created. Above all, the Funding did not follow, in particular due to the lack of agreement on the mobility component of the contract plan between the State and the Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes region, expected for a year and a half. However, the longer the wait-and-see attitude persists, the more the cost of the necessary infrastructure increases. For the Grenoble-Brignoud branch alone, the president of the Grenoble metropolis thus mentions an additional cost of 26 million euros, for an initially planned cost of 32 million euros. Thus, beyond the announcement effects, she wishes to know the Government's intentions to launch work on the Grenoble RER and more generally on the dozen projects in France as quickly as possible. She would also like to know if the financing of these SERMs will be the subject of a multi-year programming law. Finally, regarding the Grenoble project, she particularly wishes to know the date of implementation of a dedicated public interest group, the amount of funding that the State intends to grant and the due date for payment.
Question· Question écrite18542open
France · National Assembly · 11 June 2024
Ms. Cyrielle Chatelain draws the attention of the Minister of Higher Education and Research to the breakdown in equality that affects higher technician certificate (BTS) students. BTS students do not have a student card. As a result, they are not contributors to student and campus life (CVEC) and are thus excluded from support and services in favor of access to care, food, culture or still in sports. In a questionnaire carried out over three years at the Louise Michel high school in Grenoble where the rate of scholarship recipients reached 64.8%, only 12% of scholarship recipients only “sometimes” had a meal within the establishment. 35% of them considered the meal “too expensive”. While students are exposed to widespread precariousness, it is not acceptable that BTS students cannot, in the same way as any other student, have access to these services and aids essential to the smooth running of their education. This situation of inequality calls into question the fundamental principles of equality and fair access to education. She therefore questions him to find out the measures envisaged to review the status of BTS students.
Question· Question écrite16584open
France · National Assembly · 26 March 2024
Mrs Cyrielle Chatelain draws the attention of the Minister for Europe and Foreign Affairs to the urgency of an immediate and permanent ceasefire in the Gaza Strip. Indeed, despite numerous appeals by European states for more than 5 months, the Israeli government continues to violate the rules of international law. Today, we deplore the deaths of more than 30,000 Gazans, including 25,000 women and children according to figures from the White House, as well as massive destruction of vital infrastructure and hospitals. More than 1.7 million people have been displaced and now suffer from famine and epidemics. The International Court of Justice recognized, on January 26, 2024, a “plausible risk of genocide” in the Gaza Strip and ordered Israel to refrain from committing acts constituting the crime of genocide and third States to prevent and punish incitement to genocide. Faced with this situation, the actions of France and the European Union are largely insufficient. However, France and the European Union hold the levers to obtain an immediate and permanent ceasefire from the Israeli government. Indeed, the European Union is Israel's leading trading partner, representing 28.8% of its trade in goods in 2022 thanks in particular to the agreement European Union-Israel Association Agreement which entered into force in June 2000. This agreement gives Israel privileged access to the European market. This agreement is subject to “respect for human rights and democratic principles” by the parties. Faced with the massive violations of international law and human rights underway in the Gaza Strip by Israel, the European Union must condition the continuation of this privileged relationship on ceasefire in Gaza. In view of this intangible reality, she asks him if the Government will bring this request to the next Council of the European Union on Foreign Affairs and is working towards a European consensus on this issue.
Question· Question écrite16441open
France · National Assembly · 26 March 2024
Mrs. Cyrielle Chatelain questions the Minister of Sports and the Olympic and Paralympic Games on access to forest resources in the context of sports practices administered by the National Forestry Office (ONF) at the national level. In 2020, the agreement linking the ONF to the French National Olympic and Sports Committee (CNOSF) expired without being renewed. This situation raises concerns about the fairness of practices between different national federations, as well as with regard to price equity relating to access to national forests. She questions him about the progress of the renewal date of this agreement.
Question· Question écrite10586open
France · National Assembly · 1 August 2023
Mrs. Cyrielle Chatelain draws the attention of the Minister of Energy Transition to the deadlines for issuing purchase contracts by EDF for the purchase obligation in the context of a photovoltaic installation in private homes. Several residents of the second constituency of Isère reported to the MP that they did not have a buyout contract after 1 year of procedures. Knowing that state aid is subject to this repurchase contract of the electricity produced, they therefore do not receive the aid to which they are nevertheless entitled. The period of inflation and in particular the rise in energy prices that we are going through combined with the climate crisis requires us to promote citizen approaches to the production of renewable energy. She asks him if the Government can clarify the position concerning the deadlines for issuing these contracts in order to allow the citizens to benefit from aid for the installation of photovoltaic panels.
Question· Question écrite10325open
France · National Assembly · 25 July 2023
Ms. Cyrielle Chatelain alerts the Minister of Labor, Full Employment and Integration to the fragile situation of educational projects organized by specialized prevention associations. Indeed, until now, circular DGEFP/DAS No. 99/27 of June 29, 1999 had ensured a derogatory status for specialized prevention intermediary associations (AIPS) (putting in place socialization supports through a paid activity) making it possible to distinguish them from “intermediary integration associations” (whose aim is to offer an integration path through economic activity). This exceptional status has allowed each year since 1999 thousands of young people facing processes of marginalization or exclusion to participate in educational projects and thus benefit from an education and prevention tool upstream and in complementarity with the professional integration schemes. However, the sub-directorate of access to employment pathways has confirmed the legal lapse of this exceptional status due to the implementation of law no. 2020-1577 of December 14, 2020 relating to the strengthening of inclusion in employment through economic activity and the “zero long-term unemployed territory” experiment. This law unfortunately neglected to take into account the specificities specialized intermediary prevention associations which set up educational projects, which forces the people they recruit to have to be declared on the inclusion platform in order to obtain an IAE PASS. This individualized monitoring is in contradiction with the missions of specialized intermediary prevention associations and educational projects which are part of global care and a collective approach in partnership with local authorities, social landlords, neighborhood associations and families. Among the negative effects of this legal change, we can also note that it prevents young people under the age of 16 or young people in school from being employed on educational sites, who nevertheless constitute an important audience for specialized prevention. In the same way, it makes incompatible the remuneration for educational projects with the youth engagement contract (CEJ). Due to the proven risk of seeing educational projects disappear, a tool that has proven itself for the integration of young people in difficulty or socially disrupted, she asks what legal provisions, and within what time frame, the Government plans to take so that specialized prevention associations regain the exceptional status for them. allowing once again to implement its educational projects.
Question· Question écrite9040open
France · National Assembly · 20 June 2023
Mme Cyrielle Chatelain interroge M. le ministre de la transition écologique et de la cohésion des territoires sur la mise en place effective des zones à faibles émissions dans les métropoles (ZFE-m). La loi climat et résilience du 22 août 2021 dispose la mise en place, d'ici le 31 décembre 2024, de zones à faible émission de mobilité dans toutes les agglomérations de plus de 150 000 habitants sur le territoire métropolitain. Au vu des dégâts alarmants que cause la pollution de l'air sur la santé des habitants, cette mesure est essentielle. Cependant les collectivités sont confrontées à plusieurs difficultés dans leur mise en place. Les collectivités locales n'ont pas les moyens de financer à elles seules la mise en place de ZFE-m, qui implique le développement d'infrastructures indispensables mais onéreuses, comme des parkings de relais ou le renforcement des transports en commun. Il est alors nécessaire que l'État soutienne les collectivités. Enfin, il est de la même manière nécessaire de soutenir les ménages les plus démunis par un soutien financier pour l'achat d'un véhicule aux normes, afin que ces ménages ne subissent pas une forme d'exclusion du fait de la mise en place de la ZFE-m. Ce soutien peut aussi passer par des mesures comme la baisse de la TVA sur la billetterie des transports en commun. Elle souhaite savoir comment le ministère de la transition énergétique et de la cohésion des territoires compte accompagner la mise en place de la loi climat et résilience de la manière la plus juste possible.
Question· Question écrite8605answered
France · National Assembly · 6 June 2023
Mrs. Cyrielle Chatelain draws the attention of the Minister of National Education and Youth to the situation of the refusal rate for family education in the department of Isère. Many families have drawn his attention to a particularly high rate of refusal of requests for family education in Isère. The refusal rate at the national level, communicated by the ministry, is 53%. In Isère, it is 100% for families whose children are not already receiving family education. 49.1% of files are closed without further action and 51.9% are refused. It should be noted that 70% of families had difficulty drafting their project, as the decree does not give any indication of the elements to be provided to justify what constitutes a situation specific to the child. The State is the guarantor of the right to education of every child, in particular by guaranteeing access to an emancipatory education, respectful of fundamental freedoms and free. However, parents have the right to choose the type of education their child receives. Considering the refusal rate, the question of the possibility for families in Isère to choose family education arises. Thus, she asks whether the Government has planned to specify the criteria for evaluating the reasons by the administration of requests for instruction in family, particularly with regard to the reason relating to “the existence of a situation specific to the child motivating the educational project”.
Question· Question écrite6109answered
France · National Assembly · 7 March 2023
Mrs. Cyrielle Chatelain draws the attention of the Minister of National Education and Youth to the postponement of the calendar of specialty tests in biology and geology. On September 22, 2022, the Ministry of National Education announced a lasting “tightening” of the examination programs for baccalaureate specialty teaching writings which will now take place in March. While community alerts educational dates back several months, the decision was made hastily, in a few days and without consultation, even though these two specialty tests account for 32% of the final baccalaureate grade. The entire educational community (unions of teachers, inspectors, management staff, parents) nevertheless alerts for months this calendar which structurally modifies the organization of the school year, degrades the training of final year students and the teaching conditions of all. In fact, this timetable does not allow specialist teachers to complete fundamental learning, making it more difficult to acquire rigorous methods of thinking and writing within the time limit of the two previous terms. For all these reasons, she asks him if the Government plans to revise the exam calendar for postponement of specialty exams as late as possible in the school year.
Question· Question écrite3861answered
France · National Assembly · 6 December 2022
Ms. Cyrielle Chatelain questions the Minister of Energy Transition on the difficulties of access to the “energy check” system encountered by households. In a context of sharp increases in energy prices, this check issued exceptionally by the Government should help French households pay their energy bill. If households having already benefited from an energy check for the year 2022 will automatically receive an energy check, a large number of households heating with domestic fuel must connect to a digital portal set up to make an electronic request. First of all, she regrets that additional aid allowing all households to change their heating method was not adopted as part of the amending finance bill. Then she wants to call the attention of the Minister on this 100% dematerialized procedure which generates numerous non-recourse and highlights a real digital divide. The use of France services spaces, whose primary missions are to welcome, support and promote the basics of learning digital uses for residents in rural areas or priority neighborhoods under city policy was to overcome this problem. The presence of France Services in areas far from the use of digital technology is positive, although it cannot meet the need to strengthen the presence of public services in these territories. France Services, however, remains a reference support space in certain territories. Thus, in order to allow all eligible households to benefit from this assistance, it asks the Government if it considers the creation of a more operational tool delivering in such a way as to facilitate “the energy check” within the France services areas in conjunction with the tax service.
Question· Question écrite3588answered
France · National Assembly · 29 November 2022
Ms. Cyrielle Chatelain questions the Minister of National Education and Youth on the monitoring of notifications from departmental centers for people with disabilities (MDPH) by national education. The analysis of the needs and the evaluation of the skills of the student with a disability are decisive for starting school in the best conditions. The school, the family and the reference teacher must act in partnership. Thus, registration and reception in the reference school or in the one to which the student has been referred must be ensured; an initial evaluation of the student in a school situation by the educational team, which will inform the GEVA-Sco first request; the mobilization and implementation of the necessary educational adaptations throughout the period of examination of the file; the support and relay of the reference teacher; the analysis of needs and the development of the personalized schooling project by the multidisciplinary team of the MDPH. It is from the identified needs that the multidisciplinary team of the departmental center for people with disabilities develops the personalized schooling project (PPS) for the student with a disability, taking into account the wishes of the child or adolescent and their parents. It is on the basis of this project, the Commission on the Rights and Autonomy of Persons with Disabilities (CDAPH) then takes the necessary decisions, in particular concerning the notification of AESH hours. However, several parents of students expressed the impression that notifications from the MDPH of Isère would be subject to a second instance judgment by the academic inspectorate. If this were the case, this operation would go against the PPS defined by professionals and more generally the needs of the child. She asks if the Government can clarify the position of the academic inspectorate on its decision-making status regarding the management of notifications issued by MDPH regarding the allocation of notified hours of support by an AESH for children with disabilities.