France · Question · Question écrite
10488
Question 10488 — social security
Introduced
25 July 2023
Last action
—
Status
répondue
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
4 June 2024
Summary
Mr. Alexandre Vincendet draws the attention of the Minister of the Economy, Finance and Industrial and Digital Sovereignty to the expectations of recovery inspectors in terms of salary recognition. Article L. 243-7 of the Social Security Code empowers recovery inspectors to verify the basis, rate and calculation of contributions intended to finance supplementary pension plans and unemployment insurance contributions and the contributions provided for by article L. 143-11-6 of the labor code on behalf of the managing institutions mentioned in article L. 351-21 of the same code. This same article specified that agreements concluded between the Central Agency for Social Security Organizations (ACOSS) and, on the one hand, the national compulsory supplementary pension organizations (AGIRC-ARRCO) and, on the other hand, Pôle emploi, set in particular (...) the remuneration for the service rendered by the bodies responsible for collecting contributions to the general scheme. Due to the expansion of the missions of recovery inspectors, characterizing the service thus rendered to the aforementioned organizations and following negotiations initiated within the framework of social dialogue, between the Union of National Social Security Funds (UCANSS) and the trade union organizations representatives, an agreement was concluded on February 27, 2009. This agreement provides in particular “the strengthening of the control policy and the management of all the diversity and complexity of some of these activities must constitute a lever to better recognize the skills implemented by recovery inspectors and the results obtained”. As such, a professional career path (progress from level 6 to level 7 of the job classification of the protocol of November 30, 2004) is formalized: it is based on recognition of mastery of the function (assessment of experience, results and skills implemented) and is the subject of allocated national funding (article 32 of the agreement of February 27, 2009). Since 2020, the missions of inspectors have been extended to other contributions based on salaries or special categories of employment: OETH (obligation to employ disabled workers), apprenticeship tax, vocational training, each contribution to be verified having particular rules for calculations, settlements or processing. Added to this is the verification of contingent legal and regulatory measures taken into consideration specific economic, financial or social circumstances (exemption measures covid, partial unemployment, etc.). Thus, these new missions require recovery inspectors to increase their professional skills to respond to them and contribute to the increase in their workloads and their professional responsibilities: these skills and these responsibilities must be the subject of recognition valued in the form of salary. The inspectors and their union representatives presented and justified their request for salary recognition to Mr. Yann-Gaël Amghar, general director of ACOSS (known as “URSSAF Caisse Nationale”) and member of the COMEX of UCANSS. The answers given are evasive and give no substance to the expectations of the recovery inspectors, to the pretext of budgetary supervision (while the request can be financed by the management fees collected by ACOSS) and to an alleged questioning of the classification of jobs of November 30, 2004. In the absence of salary reassessment correlative to the extension of missions (generating “management costs”) and the increase in necessary skills, the attractiveness of the inspector profession weakens, professional demotivation is to be feared and the recruitment of candidates is seriously affected. Also, he would like to know if the classification of inspector jobs recovery of November 2004 is called into question and questions the desire of recovery inspectors to move from level 7 to level 8 of the job classification in the sector.
Machine translation from French. The official text remains authoritative.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
No documents linked.
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/dyn/16/questions/QANR5L16QE10488
- Open data entity: https://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/dyn/opendata/QANR5L16QE10488