France · Question · Question écrite
11211
Question 11211 — teaching
Introduced
12 September 2023
Last action
—
Status
répondue
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
19 March 2024
Summary
Mr. Benjamin Saint-Huile draws the attention of the Minister of National Education and Youth to the lack of real motivation for refusals for family education (IEF) and transparency of data by academy. The law of August 24, 2021 reinforcing respect for the principles of the Republic, in its articles 49 to 52 of section 1 of chapter V, aims to regulate the right to IEF in order to guarantee the interests of the child. So far he It was a declarative system and each family was subject to an annual visit by a national education inspector (IEN) who checked that the children were receiving education. The law of August 24, 2021 developed a new prior application regime for the IEF. However, since the entry into force of this law, the academies have refused numerous files based on the 4th reason “specific situation” without providing reasons sufficiently the cause of this refusal, by simply mentioning for example the fact that “the elements of the file do not establish the existence of a situation specific to the child motivating the educational project”. These numerous insufficiently motivated refusals contravene the public service's duty of transparency. It is therefore essential to precisely justify the reason for refusal out of concern for the equality of all before the law. Furthermore, it is necessary to make public the figures by academy of the number of families benefiting from the IEF and refusals for each reason. It is also necessary to know the number of families who attempt a compulsory prior administrative appeal (RAPO) and those who obtain satisfaction. He therefore asks him what measures he intends to take to improve the motivation of the decisions justifying the refusal of the IEF and what he intends to implement. works to standardize decisions and guarantee the right to freedom of education for these families.
Machine translation from French. The official text remains authoritative.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
No documents linked.
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/dyn/16/questions/QANR5L16QE11211
- Open data entity: https://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/dyn/opendata/QANR5L16QE11211