Question 11341 — income tax

Summary

Mr. Saïd Ahamada draws the attention of the Minister of Solidarity and Health to the differential treatment to which retired people are subject in access to care, through the cost of their supplementary health insurance. In fact, retirees must bear a higher cost of additional insurance than other social categories. Not only does the retiree naturally cease to benefit from support from a employer of part of his contribution, but this is also increased, even if the law provides for a cap on this increase. In addition, the law of June 14, 2013 on job security, transposing the national interprofessional agreement (ANI) of January 11, 2013, provides that from January 1, 2016, all companies must offer their employees additional collective health coverage. In fact, the power of negotiation of people is now reduced, due to the proliferation of group contracts which has had a mechanical effect on the individual contracts concerned. Finally, retirees cannot deduct these contributions from their taxable income. Ultimately, according to the National Federation of French Mutuality (FNMF), a retiree would bear an average cost of supplementary insurance three times higher than an active employee. Also, he asks what compensatory measures could be taken to restore fairer treatment to retirees. He would like to know, in particular, whether the extension to retirees of the tax deductibility of contributions from which working people benefit could be considered.

Machine translation from French. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

• Saïd Ahamada · auteur

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.