PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

France · Question · Question écrite

11454

Question 11454 — defense

answeredFrance· National Assembly· FR

Introduced

9 December 2025

Last action

Status

répondue

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

14 April 2026

Summary

Mr. Hubert Brigand draws the attention of the Minister of the Armed Forces and Veterans to the request expressed by several veterans' associations in her constituency concerning the extension of the dual campaign system to all weapons. These associations emphasize that national navy personnel have benefited, since a decree of October 17, 2017, from double campaign accounting for certain periods. operations, thus allowing fairer consideration of the risks and particular constraints to which they were exposed. However, they question the lack of extension of this system to all military personnel engaged in comparable conditions, particularly in the army, the air and space forces, as well as the gendarmerie. Representatives of the fighting world recall that many soldiers of these Other arms participated in external operations in combat or high-intensity environments, sharing the same dangers, the same operational constraints and the same psychological burdens as their naval comrades. They consider that a difference in treatment between forces cannot be justified as long as the exposure conditions are identical or similar. They therefore demand the establishment an equity measure consisting of extending the benefit of the double campaign to all soldiers who have served in zones or missions giving entitlement to this system, regardless of their original weapon or training. Also, he asks him his intentions on this question, and to know if a harmonization of the system of the double campaign for the benefit of the soldiers of the other arms is envisaged, in order to guarantee equality of recognition between all those who have taken on missions involving the same level of commitment and danger.

Machine translation from French. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.