France · Question · Question écrite
11497
Question 11497 — civil servants and public agents
Introduced
9 December 2025
Last action
—
Status
répondue
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
27 January 2026
Summary
Mr. Jonathan Gery draws the attention of the Minister of National Education to the worrying effects of the introduction of compulsory membership in the MGEN collective mutual fund for teaching staff. Since the reform of complementary social protection for state agents, the generalization of membership in collective mutual insurance is planned from May 2026 for national education personnel. However, several Teachers report pressure being exerted now, in particular by communications from MGEN telling them that they must join before the end of 2025 under penalty of financial sanctions. This anticipation seems contrary to the official calendar and causes great confusion, as well as a climate of constraint that is particularly badly felt. Beyond this procedural aspect, the measure raises substantive concerns. Of Many teachers note that the offers offered within the framework of the MGEN collective contract are significantly more expensive than the contracts to which they have been able to subscribe until now on an individual or family basis. They also deplore less favorable reimbursement levels, particularly on important items such as optics. For certain families, compulsory membership leads to an increase in contributions significant, without improvement in coverage and sometimes even with a reduction in benefits. In many cases, foresight is no longer included and must be added separately, generating an additional cost. He therefore wishes to know what measures the Government intends to take to guarantee that the obligation to join collective mutual insurance respects the announced timetable, without unjustified anticipation. He also asks if the The government plans to allow teachers to maintain freedom of choice in terms of complementary health insurance, for example by authorizing the possibility of renouncing affiliation while losing employer participation, in order to preserve their rights and their purchasing power. Finally, he questions the Minister on the guarantees provided so that the reform does not lead to a deterioration in the conditions of health coverage for teachers, who are already in high demand in the exercise of their profession.
Machine translation from French. The official text remains authoritative.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
No documents linked.
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/dyn/17/questions/QANR5L17QE11497
- Open data entity: https://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/dyn/opendata/QANR5L17QE11497