Question 13624 — road safety

Summary

Mr. Richard Ramos questions the Minister, alongside the Minister of State, Minister of Ecological and Inclusive Transition, responsible for transport, on the implementation of the post-parking package (FPS) and its extremely damaging organizational and economic consequences which are currently weighing on shared mobility operators. Whereas previously, rental companies had the possibility, in the event of a fine of parking, to designate the tenant responsible, from now on, they must first pay the FPS payment and then turn against the tenant in order to recover the amount. This situation is detrimental to the rights and interests of shared mobility operators as well as tenant customers. In fact, current legislation does not allow these operators to transfer, in the context of their activity, responsibility of the FPS payment on the actual driver of the vehicle. In the current situation, any clause introducing, into the general conditions of rental contracts, the automatic passing on of the FPS charge to the customer would be qualified as an unfair clause with regard to consumer law. This situation has significant financial consequences and may call into question the economic sustainability of mobility companies. shared. Indeed, the FPS amounts are sometimes much higher than that of the average daily profit from the short-term rental of a vehicle. He asks that this situation, which is particularly damaging to the activity of shared mobility operators, finds a rapid legislative solution in order to reestablish a mechanism for designating the responsible tenant.

Machine translation from French. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.