Question 13837 — road safety

Summary

Mr. Jean-François Portarrieu draws the attention of the Minister of the Interior to the implementation of the post-parking package (FPS) and its organizational and economic consequences on shared mobility operators. Whereas previously, rental companies had the possibility, in the event of a parking fine, to designate the tenant responsible, now they must first pay the FPS regulation and then turn against the tenant in order to recover the amount. According to the profession, this situation would be extremely detrimental to the rights and interests of shared mobility operators as well as tenant customers. Indeed, current legislation would not allow these operators to transfer, in the context of their activity, responsibility for payment of the FPS to the actual driver of the vehicle. In this situation, any clause introducing, into the general conditions of rental contracts, the automatic passing on of the FPS charge to the customer would be qualified as an unfair clause under consumer law. This situation would have considerable financial consequences and could call into question the economic sustainability of shared mobility companies. Indeed, the FPS amounts are sometimes much higher than that of the average daily profit from short-term rental of a vehicle. Therefore, he would like to know his position on this subject, to know what the Government plans to implement to avoid penalizing shared mobility operators and whether a mechanism for designating the responsible tenant could be reestablished.

Machine translation from French. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.