Question 13838 — road safety

Summary

Mr. Sébastien Nadot draws the attention of the Minister of the Interior to the implementation of the post-parking package (FPS) and its organizational consequences on shared mobility operators. Rental companies previously had the option, in the event of a parking fine, to name the tenant responsible. From now on, they must first pay the FPS payment and then turn against the tenant in order to recover the amount. This situation seems extremely detrimental to the rights and interests of shared mobility operators as well as tenant customers. Because, in fact, current legislation does not allow these operators to transfer, in the context of their activity, the responsibility for paying the FPS to the actual driver of the vehicle. In the present situation, any clause introducing, in the general conditions rental contracts, the automatic passing on of the FPS charge to the customer would be qualified as an unfair clause under consumer law. This situation has considerable financial consequences and goes so far as to call into question the economic sustainability of shared mobility companies. Indeed, the amounts of FPS are sometimes much higher than that of the average daily profit from the rental of short life of a vehicle. He asks him what measures he intends to take to allow rental companies to benefit from a mechanism for designating the tenant responsible in the event of a parking fine.

Machine translation from French. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.